Oh wow. Two -- well, three --- good authors on tonight, & I spent all todays free time curled up under a blanket with tea, cat, & a completely unrelated book. Well, ColbertNewsHub has a good assortment of links & more background.
Jon's got both authors of We’re With Nobody: Two Insiders Reveal the Dark Side of American Politics, Alan Huffman & Michael Rejebian. Publisher's Weekly has this:
In this timely book, journalists Huffman (Ten Point) and Rejebian lift the curtain on political research to find dirt on opponents. While Americans are accustomed to hearing scandalous facts, lies, distortions, and gossip during campaigns, few people understand how legal political intelligence gathering has grown in scope since the Watergate break-in of 1972. Based on close to 20 years on the road, these two veteran practitioners, who worked for both parties, but mostly for Democratic clients, recount both minor legal infractions and major transgressions that they’ve uncovered on the part of individuals running for public office. While an occasional candidate has an unblemished record, most of Huffman and Rejebian’s subjects are unsavory. The authors defend their line of work, claiming the mantle of truth seekers, and asserting that their efforts are crucial to America’s “evolving democracy.” However, readers will likely shake their heads over the multiple car wrecks of people’s lives seen here. While possible solutions are mentioned in passing (such as truth-in-political-advertising laws that include fines and enforcement mechanisms, and resources like Factcheck.org and PolitiFact.com), the authors seem too accepting of this sorry state of affairs to clamor for change.
Kirkus has this:
A bright romp through the world of opposition political research.
Since 1993, former journalists Huffman (Sultana: Surviving the Civil War, Prison, and the Worst Maritime Disaster in American History, 2009, etc.) and Rejebian have worked in “oppo,” gathering damaging information on political candidates and their opponents in local, state and national elections. “Everything we cite in our reports must be thorough, honest, accurate and, as we can’t stress enough, documented,” they write. How clients use the information is a different story. In this revealing, anecdote-filled account, the authors describe a year of investigations that took them from front porches to courthouses to presidential libraries in search of “political intel.” We see them reviewing municipal records under guard, pitching prospective clients, fending off difficult people, fielding suspicious phone calls and using ingenious methods to deal with officious government clerks. No one knows quite what to make of them (“Who did you say you’re with?”), and they vacillate privately over their own identity, seeing themselves on one hand as journalists without bylines and on the other as “part investigator, part critic, part paid informant.” In fact, they are partners in the political research firm Huffman & Rejebian, part of a multimillion-dollar industry that is “a crucial underpinning” of American politics. Ironically, the authors are not deeply political people; they express disgust at the nastiness of American politics and amazement at the undocumented claims some candidates will make to get elected. They refuse to rely solely on online sources (often inaccurate or incomplete) and instead beat a path by foot to the doors of ex-wives and others in the know. They say many candidates don’t know what’s in their own record and don’t want to. One prospective candidate, confronted with an incident report about the beating he gave his girlfriend at an airport, dropped his plans to run.
A good book for anyone who has wondered how scandalous past behavior makes its way into campaign headlines.
And here's my favorite from the Amazon customer reviews:
Not hard to be a little cynical here: more than a few of these reviews appear to be written by friends. No shame in that. After all, as the saying goes, what are friends for? As for me, I am just a reader with a more than a little unhealthy interest in opposition research. I was disappointed that there was not more detail about the actual techniques of the trade. But that said this book is filled with alternating antidotes that has the feel of a southern noir novel stocked with philosophical musings. So for those who are interested in opposition research I do recommend this book. It is a quick read that comes as close to an intimate personal conversation about the subject that you will find in a book.
|