Skip to main content

The State of Washington in 2007 adopted rules requiring pharmacists to provide access to legal prescriptions to all who request them and prohibited pharmacists from discriminating in the provision of services and products.  This was to circumvent individual pharmacists or companies from objecting to the provision of prescriptions for the RU-486 or Plan B drugs designed as "emergency contraception".  

But today, Federal Judge Ronald Leighton ruled that pharmacists are not required to dispense a medication they feel is at odd with their personal religious beliefs and that Washington State's requirement for them to do so is an infringement of their rights.

It should be noted that this decision is actually a "remanded" case from the Ninth Circuit that told him his original 2008 ruling on this matter was incorrect.  This Judge then held an 11 day hearing but came up with this ruling based on supposed business exemptions that pharmacies can choose to not stock drugs such as paperwork, supply availability, cost etc.

What I think is going to happen is this is going to be appealed (AGAIN) to the Ninth Circuit and they are going to blast this ruling out.  But, I would suspect the conservatives are setting up a test case for SCOTUS.

On a side note, legislation is pending in Washington's legislature that would require those hospitals and medical facilities and insurance plans that offer maternity services to also offer access to abortion services.

http://www.seattlepi.com/...

Update Thanks for the Rec listing.

Originally posted to chipoliwog on Wed Feb 22, 2012 at 01:39 PM PST.

Also republished by PacNW Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site