Skip to main content


Thank goodness for Rick Santorum. Now, I do not make that statement unadvisedly. I despise Rick Santorum. But once in awhile, even one's worst enemy can crystallize an issue and force the country to make a choice.

In his front page post today, Armando wrote about Rick Santorum's answer to a question by George Stephanopoulos about separation of church and state:

I don't believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute. The idea that the church can have no influence or no involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country.

(Emphasis added)

ABC News

To note that Santorum is wrong is obvious to any Kog or Kossack. But I love that the true Republican agenda has been revealed and that Americans are being forced to make a plain choice. Enough with the dog whistles: Let's put it to a vote.

There's more below the double gnocchi, but first a word from our sponsor:

Top Comments recognizes the previous day's Top Mojo and Top Photos and strives to promote each day's outstanding comments through nominations made by Kossacks like you. Please send us the comments you'd like to nominate (but not your own) either by email to or by our KosMail message board before 9:30pm ET. Just click on the Spinning Top™ to make a submission.

Make sure that you include the direct link to the comment (the URL), which is available by clicking on that comment's date/time. Please let us know your Daily Kos user name if you use email so we can credit you properly. If you send a writeup with the link, we can include that as well. The diarist poster reserves the right to edit all content.

Ever since Ronald Reagan's presidency, it has been clear to me and many liberals and progressives that the right does not like the form of government our Founding Fathers chose. Reagan was fond of the rather unpatriotic notion that the government of the United States was "the problem and not a solution." And yet he ran to be the head of that very government he didn't believe in. A weird guy. Of course, as shown in Iran-Contra, he tried his best to break those pesky Constitutional checks and balances.

Since then, many right wingers have tried to reinvent history and claim that the U.S. was founded as a "Christian" nation. The fact is that Jefferson, Madison, et al. clearly rejected such an idea, and even those critics from the right who are not totally insane reject the notion that the US was intended to be a Christian theocracy. Instead, what these men of the Enlightenment chose was a liberal democracy based on reason and scientific thought. They clearly rejected the notion of a theocracy, and the belief in separation of church and state and in religious freedom was enshrined in both the Preamble and the First Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment confirmed the principle.

Nevertheless, modern movement conservatism based itself on the "Moral Majority" of Jerry Falwell, and the right has waged war on liberal democracy, seeking to replace it with oligarchic theocracy ever since. This ideological blend has united the Republican base for years. The wealthy wing of the GOP used the theocrats to cement its position as the oligarchy, and the social reactionary wing was willing to be used by the oligarchs to enable their theocracy. Or so they thought.

The problem is that the social reactionary wing has been used by the oligarchs to a point where it is really starting to hurt, and they really haven't made much if any progress on establishing their theocracy. They are naturally angry, but, after years of brainwashing by their corporate masters, the social reactionaries are mad at the government (i.e., we the people), not the oligarchs. Instead of realizing that 1) smaller government and lower taxes only mean that the rich can steal from them with impunity, and 2) the rich will never enact their lunatic social agenda, the social reactionaries blamed it on the scary black, Kenyan-born Muslim — even before he was inaugurated! After all, rich white people can't be wrong, can they?

So I am glad Santorum has placed the issue of separation of church and state clearly on the agenda. No more grumblings about "family values," "law and order," or "morality." Forget those old dog whistles. Lay it out there as Santorum does and let's discuss it.

I often ask those who claim America is a "Christian" nation which form of Christianity they think we are. Puritans? Catholics? Quakers? Seventh-Day Adventists? Mormons? Baptists? Which flavor of Baptist? Primitive Baptist or Southern Baptist? You see, the truth is that there are as many different religious beliefs as there are sentient people in the US.

If we ever adopt Santorum's

idea that the church can have no influence or no involvement in the operation of the state,
then it is Katie-bar-the-door. You see, people do not generally change their religious beliefs just because someone votes that they should or because someone orders them to. Religious beliefs are fundamental to the very core of who a person is. How can "the blessings of liberty" be "secure" if I do not have the freedom to decide what God or gods I choose to believe or not believe in? It is the very essence of human freedom.

The Spanish Inquisition showed us that it took extreme torture to get people to renounce their religious beliefs and often even that didn't work. The Soviets showed us that a government can repress public religious expression but never extinguish religious belief. The fact is that every time in the history of human civilization that a government has tried to make people conform to a religion it has resulted in death, destruction, and destitution.

What we agreed to when we founded this country was that such matters are personal and should carry no weight in the public discourse of governing. "Because that's my faith" is not a valid argument in a liberal democracy. Since their faith is the social reactionary right's only argument against abortion, gay marriage, contraception, etc., the wing nuts must change the nature of our government or abandon the argument. Given that we are still a liberal democracy, that argument has already been lost by the right.

So I am glad that Rick Santorum has said John F. Kennedy's speech on separation of church and state makes him "want to throw up." The only Catholic president in history affirmed the separation of church and state to appease (you guessed it) social reactionaries on the right who feared the Pope would be giving JFK orders. Now Santorum seems to be saying, "You're damn straight the Pope will be giving me orders and, not only will I be obeying them, I will do my best to make sure that every one of you obeys them, too, whether you're Catholic or not." And the social reactionaries thunder their agreement. The irony is thick.

So I say, OK, Rick, let's vote on it. I think it's time you put the issue squarely and forthrightly on the table. Then, as Armando pointed out, you can explain why this is wrong:

We in the United States, above all, must remember that lesson, for we were founded as a nation of openness to people of all beliefs. And so we must remain. Our very unity has been strengthened by our pluralism. We establish no religion in this country, we command no worship, we mandate no belief, nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate.
Before you get nauseous and declare your undying opposition to the separation of church and state, however, you might want to consider that the words above were spoken by your hero, Ronald Reagan.

But remember, Santorum, even if you improbably win and even if you even more improbably pass theocratic legislation, your position is still unconstitutional. Our Founding Fathers tried to make sure of that. Even some George W. Bush-appointed judges realize it. You'll have to repeal the First Amendment and probably the Fourteenth Amendment too. Good luck with that.

But thanks for bringing this issue out of the closet, so to speak, and putting it squarely on the table: Do we believe in separation of church and state or not? I think it's THE fundamental question of our time.

Image credits:

Cartoon courtesy
Spanish Inquisition courtesy Wikipedia

February 26, 2012

Thanks to tonight's Top Comments contributors! Let us hear from YOU
when you find that great comment.

From gravlax:

From Morning Open Thread, really a twofer. First JaxDem offered this great comment to Otteray Scribe and then JanF added some more wisdom.
From belinda ridgewood:
In today's J Town diary, when nomandates offered a link to her Inoculation Project diary entitled Sheep Brains and Bridge Building, side pocket made a perfect but incorrect guess about its subject.
From carolita:
Demi Moaned makes several good comments in JekyllnHyde's excellent My God What a F&#@g Mess, but my pick for the best is this warning about the normalization of GOP crazy.
From jethrock:
My nomination for Top Comment of the day is...drumroll...this one about NASCAR and life by weatherdude.
From Nurse Kelley (KelleyRN2):
In today's KosAbility diary, left over flower child discussed - among other things - the way the disabled are seen by many as "being" their disability. A comment by ulookarmless highlighted her point beautifully.
From your humble diarist poster:
ThinkFirst summed up Santorum's impact on the Catholic Church and the GOP in this comment found in Armando's front page post, Rick Santorum expels JFK, declares church-state separation 'makes me want to throw up'.
Post-It Note: Last night's unknown contributor was actually Odysseus. Many thanks!

February 25, 2012

(excluding Tip Jars and first comments)

Got mik!

  1) How many times does the Republican Party ... by Demi Moaned — 241
  2) Sorry, Franklin, I am a Methodist, and by blue jersey mom — 171
  3) This is clearly a GOP meme for 2012 by davidkc — 141
  4) Wishful thinking! by Demi Moaned — 141
  5) I take nothing for granted.` by second gen — 110
  6) And I can't forget, ever, by native — 98
  7) I am so mad at the Girl Scouts. by BenderRodriguez — 90
  8) Who is not Christian? by freelunch — 88
  9) So...I see the higher education didn't manage to by Lorikeet — 84
10) My main concern is... by Patrick is Lucky — 83
11) Important diary, jamess. by Onomastic — 82
12) OK, Mr. Graham, a little basic theology for you by blue aardvark — 80
13) True story: by commonmass — 79
14) That is true. But still... by voracious — 76
15) Jesus was a member of Occupy Judea by Nailbanger — 76
16) Yeah, but one guy with 14 million to spare by beach babe in fl — 76
17) No by Steveningen — 74
18) Snob = Uppity by Paleo — 73
19) it's effin' better than nothing! by ericlewis0 — 70
20) If flirting with 13,000 by tytalus — 68
21) I know. I LOL'd at that by BoiseBlue — 67
22) Unfortunatel, the joke is on all of us by Demi Moaned — 66
23) I can't believe by Patriot4peace — 64
24) Gleick is something of a hero, isn't he? by IndieGuy — 64
25) GASP!  OMG!  Oh Noes!   by middleagedhousewife — 62
26) Actual headline by Scarce — 61
27) Origins of English by Ojibwa — 59
28) "No more hitler-bulbs" by JML9999 — 59
29) Caturdai after Mardi Gras. by jwinIL14 — 57
30) Yes there is by grannycarol — 56

February 25, 2012

Enjoy jotter's wonderful PictureQuilt™ below. Just click on the picture and it will magically take you to the comment that features that photo. Have fun, Kossacks!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site