Skip to main content

The Republican primary season is inflicting damage on its candidates, notably 'frontrunner' Mitt the Inevitable, as well as suppressing voter enthusiasm (despite Gallup's claims to the contrary). The Super PAC's,  which were going to crush the Democrats,  have instead had the unintended consequence of dragging out the primary fight,  keeping Newt Gingrich's candidacy  alive for example.  The RNC has issued a long memo in which it says,  it's really not that bad, but wants none of the blame anyway.

Paul Senft, an RNC committeeman from Florida, told TPM that the “uncalculated and unintended consequences of the super PACs” were creating problems in what might otherwise be a productive long primary.
The ease with which Republican candidates can use these independent groups to level devastating negative attacks is worrying to some party leaders, who argue it’s been a much bigger factor than any scheduling issues.
Ha ha ha ha:
“It put a lot of money into it — the depth and breadth of the carpet bombing done with negative campaigning was not anticipated,” he said. “We probably gave ourselves too much credit, thinking we’re above it, we won’t do that to each other. But Reagan’s 11th Commandment, ‘Dont speak ill of Republicans,’ looks like it’s almost gone and forgotten.”

The RNC changed the rules in 2010 to encourage a longer primary process, but things 'got out of hand' when states states disobeyed their prescribed schedule and spread the contests out over a longer period than was originally intended. Florida added a month to the schedule, which the RNC communications director ignores in his memo.

As top Republicans lament the ongoing presidential primary’s toll on the party, the RNC is out with a detailed memo arguing that the extended fight is not harmful to their chances in November. And if it is, well, don’t blame the RNC.
Writes the RNC communications director:
“Over the last few weeks, pundits have made some incredibly improbable predictions for the 2012 Republican primary,” RNC communications director Sean Spicer writes in the memo. “But while this intense focus on the process of the primaries makes for great chatter, it has turned some myths into inaccurate conventional wisdom. The stories, forecasts, and endless buzz are no doubt engaging, but they are rooted in neither facts nor precedent.”
The GOP is using the 2008 Democratic primary as a rationale for why this carpet-bombing Death Star slugfest of a Republican primary is a good thing. But the Republicans aren't getting any of the benefits that contest produced.
While accurate that these fears proved overblown, one reason Republicans have been less than pleased with the primary is that they don’t seem to be getting the same benefits as the Obama/Clinton fight. Turnout and voter registration shot up in Democratic primary states thanks to the competitive race, but it’s been down in most Republican contests. And, unlike in 2008, frontrunner Mitt Romney is rapidly losing popularity and financial strength as the race goes on rather than gaining as Obama did.

Spicer also argues that it’s a “myth” that the party is demoralizing Republican voters, despite some polls showing GOP enthusiasm waning. Spicer cites a recent Gallup poll to counter these claims:

According to Gallup, Republicans are more enthusiastic than Democrats, 53 to 45 percent. Republicans in 2012 are more enthusiastic than Republicans in 2008 by 53 to 44 percent. And Republicans have given more thought to the election than Democrats by 70 to 58 percent

Well if it's not the RNC's fault, whose is it?
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site