Skip to main content

Cross posted at Blue Virginia

Here's what I don't get:  Every serious analyst agrees that the current increase in gas prices is due to the current US policy of getting tough on Iran, and market fears that we, or Israel, may get even tougher. Even the CEO of Exxon has said as much.  And yet we are having an absurd political debate about the gas price increases that barely mentions these actual reasons.  See for example this story in today's Washington Post which never even mentions Iran.  

Yet every single time the President's enemies bring up climate change, they invariably refer to efforts to mitigate climate impacts as some form of "gas tax".  Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Urinal has spilled much ink making that connection, just as Sen. Inhofe (R-Oil) has released massive quantities of CO2 calling cap and trade proposals "Cap and Tax."

So why don't we talk about an Iran policy gas tax?

Look, every policy has costs associated with it, and if our political leaders ever treated us as adults, they would talk with us about what those costs are and why we should consider bearing them -- instead of telling us we can have whatever policies we choose while cutting our taxes to the bone.  

But instead, we have a selective conversation -- for some policies, like climate change, politicians talk about the cost of action, but almost never about the costs of inaction.  (Those who have looked at the costs of ignoring climate change put it well in the trillions.) For military issues, like what we do with Iraq, Iran and Syria, it's the reverse -- these actions, Republicans tell us, are essential to take regardless of the cost.  (Indeed, Mitt Romney has called for increasing our military budget to record levels beyond what we spent to counter the Soviet Union.)

At the same time, the outlay side of the ledger and the revenue side are almost always separated in Washington, so it seems that we can always talk about cutting taxes to infinitessimal levels with no impact on whatever we call for on the policy side.   It's all like listening to schitzophrenics having a conversation totally unhinged from reality.

Stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is a policy with merit if carried out diplomatically and well, and I support the Obama administration's sanctions policy.  But let's be completely honest in acknowledging that such a policy is raising our gas prices and more drastic policies, like bombing Iran -- which I totally oppose -- will send gas prices through the roof.  It's an implicit tax, the cost of our policy choices.  

Dealing with climate change will also involve paying some costs and making some choices.  It's worth paying those prices because thousands of scientists worldwide have identified many disturbing consequences of global warming that will only get worse -- to dangerously extreme levels -- the longer we put off serious action.

Maybe someday we can have leaders who talk to us like this, explaining the costs of action vs. inaction in regards to all of our policy decisions, so we can make those decisions well.  Until then, we're all stuck in dreamworld, unequipped to understand why our policy choices keep leading to disaster.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rmabelis

    It ain't over 'till the orange guy cries. Now on Twitter.

    by kindler on Sat Mar 10, 2012 at 07:56:30 AM PST

  •  The public isn't worried about global warming (0+ / 0-)

    I guess they can't afford to worry about it.  Meanwhile, the ruling class keeps raking in the profits.  Those oil companies pay a fat-ass dividend, you know.  They grease a lot congressman too.

    Talking about gas prices is not the same discussion as global warming.  They're kind of opposites.

    Republicans: Taking the country back ... to the 19th century

    by yet another liberal on Sat Mar 10, 2012 at 08:21:42 AM PST

  •  Israeli Lobby (0+ / 0-)

    You want politicians to talk to us like adults, yet the Israeli Lobby is so powerful that such a conversation is impossible in an election year--or maybe any year.

    •  How does the Israel Lobby make a conversation (0+ / 0-)

      impossible?

      Did I miss something?  Did someone introduce a bill to legislate against free speech?  Did they lobby for that bill?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site