Skip to main content

I recently spoke at the Council of Educational Facility Planners International (CEFPI) conference in Columbia, SC, charged with the daunting task of speaking on the conference theme, "The Role of Technology in Public Education," while using technology to argue that education needs to heed strong cautions about the lure of technology.

At one of the keynote talks, another speaker ended his presentation by highlighting what he feels is the next wave of educational innovation—Khan Academy.

Just a couple days later, Khan popped up again on a segment of 60 Minutes.

At this intersection of technology, education, and media, I have to note that Sal Khan and his new wave of video-based education has something striking in common with Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education, Bill Gates as education entrepreneur, and Michelle Rhee as draconian education administrator.

The Cult of Personality v. Expertise

First, let's consider how Duncan, Gates, Rhee, and Khan attained their status as educators, educational leaders, and educational reformers.

Secretary of Education Duncan walked the path of appointment to his status in education.

Peter Smagorinsky puts it best:

"Let’s trace his path to the presidential Cabinet. One of Duncan’s childhood friends, John Rogers, appointed Duncan director of the Ariel Education Initiative in Chicago. Duncan’s directorship led to Ariel’s reincarnation as a charter school, following which Duncan was advanced in the Chicago Public School system from deputy chief of staff to chief executive officer. Note that he worked exclusively at the executive level, never stooping to teach classes or learn about schools except from an operational perspective."
How about Bill Gates? This one is easy, to become an education expert or education reformer, Gates amassed billions of dollars, which apparently equates with expertise in any field he so chooses.

And Michelle Rhee? Bypass the education establishment by not receiving any degrees in education, become a leader by entering the classroom through TFA, teach three years, and then attain your credibility by firing teachers and creating an education system built on fraudulent test data.

This brings us back to Sal Khan—whose wikipedia page identifies him as an "American educator."

Pretty impressive considering he, like Rhee, Duncan, and Gates, has no degrees in education, and like Duncan and Gates, has no experience teaching.

Sal Khan got tired of his day job, started tutoring his relatives, made some videos, and now is a full-fledged educator. And according to CBS, he may be the future of education.

Ironically, Khan and his academy do offer us a powerful lesson about education and education reform, a lesson repeated by Duncan, Gates, and Rhee:

The cult of personality can garner you public fame and accolades as an educator and reformer, but that notoriety is all glitz, ultimately causing more harm than good.

Let me return to my recent talk at CEFPI. Throughout the day, I noticed that speakers and participants at this conference—primarily architects, technology experts, engineers, and administrators—argued for the use of technology to support individualized, student-centered instruction as well as project-based learning.

Two things are interesting about this pattern.

The participants and speakers appeared to believe that those ideas (individualized, student-centered instruction and project-based learning) were innovative, personified by the "new wave" ideas of Khan. (I am always fascinated that people who have no background or experience in education can trust that ideas generated outside of education have somehow never been considered by educators.)

During the final panel presentation at the conference, I noted two things for the participants and speakers.

First, I clarified that teachers have never made policy decisions for education in the U.S. If education has failed, as most people claim, that failure isn't the result of decisions made by educators.

Second, I informed them that individualized, student-centered learning and project-based learning were championed by John Dewey a century ago and popularized by William Heard Kilpatrick in the 1930s.

Khan, I added, is not being innovative, if, in fact, his video-based learning is advocating what they claim. But beyond that, Khan has no expertise as an educator.

Khan has been a stellar student (if we can trust wikipedia), but that doesn't make someone an educator any more than being a stellar athlete assures that person can coach. Or that being a frequent flyer qualifies a person to pilot a plane.

Khan's plan for education fails also on many other levels:

• Prepackaging content insures a static approach to knowledge and understanding. This is the essential failure of the "banking concept" of education denounced by Paulo Freire.

• Focusing on content leaves the student out of any decision making concern what should be learned and why. Teaching is reduced to a service industry and students are, then, just passive and thoughtless customers.

• Video lectures are essentially little different than a textbook, and thus carry the same traditional limitations textbooks do.

• More and more genuine experts who are examining Khan's videos are exposing that the content is often of a low quality; the videos may be engaging, but accuracy is being sacrificed.

In the big picture, Khan, again, is showing what is essentially wrong with U.S. public education and the perennial move to reform it: We are trapped in the cult of personality and ignoring the enormous wealth of expertise that exists in the classrooms of K-12 school and universities across the U.S.

The cult of personality is a self-serving dynamic. In the current personality-based education reform movement, Duncan, Gates, Rhee, and Khan are all feeding their own aggrandizement.

Theirs is not about democracy or student autonomy or teacher professionalism.

With the death of U.S. public education, the cult of personality is also sacrificing expertise.

Teachers as professionals, teachers as experts are enduring. Expertise deserves our attention.

Originally posted to plthomasEdD on Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 09:50 AM PDT.

Also republished by Education Alternatives.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  "Technology in the classroom" (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Marie, plthomasEdD, Akla

    too often means a virtual textbook and virtual worksheets.  It's the same old seatwork in electronic form.

    There are some good ones, however, that I wouldn't want to do without.

    Molecular Workbench
    Geology Labs Online

    Light is seen through a small hole.

    by houyhnhnm on Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 10:18:07 AM PDT

  •  I've used Khan Academy with my daughter (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Marie, plthomasEdD, Linda Wood

    from time to time, for example when she is home sick.

    As a supplementary free site on the internet, it is fabulous. It's is a great place to go to brush up on a concept. It is fun to drill simple math that can be done in your head.

    As a full fledged educational curriculum, it is substantially lower quality than the math program my daughter's public school uses.

    A very clear example would be the word problems. There are really only a few word problems for each lesson, just with different numbers substituted. Even with only 10 problems to be "proficient", you will see the same question repeated with different numbers. Comparing the same material with what came home with my daughter's worksheets, the Khan questions were far less sophisticated even before you considered that there were only 5 distinct ones.

    This is the problem with online education: People don't mind spending money on software, but they don't like to spend money on creating data.

    So I like the site, and I'm glad he did it, and I would support more funding for it. But the canonization of Khan as some second coming to education scares me something fierce.

    Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!

    by elfling on Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 10:40:06 AM PDT

  •  the wave of the future!! (0+ / 0-)

    Why deal with teachers, all of whom are bad anyway.  Just get the best to video tape the lessons, put them on the internets, and save money.  

    As you say, it is the cult of personality and who can raise money.  As a self learner, I know the value of being able to look up information either on the internet or in books in a real library.  And I know that it is because I have had good teachers who taught me to question and to learn how to learn, as well as basic content, that I am able to self learn.  Most people have never been taught this.  Instead, they do not question, they do not seek.  Wikipedia is their source--because of the cult thing again--they could have just as easily used the internet to look at real encyclopedias or even the source documents.  They do not search for information, they google it.  Technology has a place, but only if one learns how to use it to learn.  That is something we fail to teach.

  •  Part of the problem... (0+ / 0-)

    IMO is that teaching, as a female-dominated profession in the U.S. in a male-dominated world, has struggled so to assert itself as a true "profession" like doctors and medicine.

    Given that, when public schools faced a crisis in the early 20th century, they turned to business men to step in and manage public education and improve its popular "image", but destroying teachers' ability to fully control the profession in the process.  Corporations and corporate business leaders began running public schools in their mindset and worldview, and I think it has continued from there, with some efforts by more progressive educators to rebel in the 1960s and 1970s.

    Cooper Zale Los Angeles

    by leftyparent on Thu Mar 15, 2012 at 07:29:27 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site