Skip to main content


Try as they might to paint the GOP as kindly, wise, family-values grandfathers -- the damage caused by the party of misogyny has already been done.


Parker:Republican War on Womentoo simplistic for issue

by Kathleen Parker, Columbian Syndicated Columnist -- March 15, 2012

[...]
Republicans might wish nothing more than to stuff birth control pills back into the bottle, but Democrats aren’t about to let them. The narrative already has a title: “The Republican War on Women.” One can hardly blame Democrats for taking advantage of a perfect storm of stupefying proportions.
[...]

War has been declared, and there’s hardly any way to change the impression among a growing percentage of women that the GOP is the party of knuckle-dragging Neanderthals. It’s a smart move for Democrats to keep replaying the message, but is it fair -- and is it true? What say we relax the rhetoric and see what sanity lies beneath?

Contrary to what the White House insists, Limbaugh is not the leader of the GOP. [...]


Oh really Ms Parker, the proof of that is in what the GOP says and does, and continues to do -- to rollback Women's rights and Women's health care interests ... every day they remain in office.


First off there's the GOP front runner, who still shows way too much deference to Limbaugh -- and who has squarely put Planned Parenthood in his budget slashing sights. Never mind it's the only health care resource that multitudes of women have access to ...


Will Mitt Romney lose women voters over Planned Parenthood remark?

Mitt Romney said he would 'get rid' of Planned Parenthood.

by Steve Peoples, Associated Press, csmonitor.com --  March 15, 2012

[...]
Asked to clarify the Planned Parenthood reference hours after the report aired, top Romney campaign adviser Eric Fehrnstrom said Romney did not mean to suggest his administration would eliminate the women's health care provider altogether. Indeed, in remarks before and after the Missouri interview, Romney indicated he would focus on eliminating the organization's federal funding, as Republicans in Washington and in state legislatures across the country have fought to do in recent months.
[...]

So with Romney it's not an all out war against women, but rather a battle of attrition. It's just part of his philosophy of austerity, I guess.  He's an equality opportunity denier.


I wonder where Romney would stand on this next Bill to fight Violence against Women's -- with his GOP stonewalling associates, or with the women in harm's way, who desperately need the support when violence is directed their way?


Democrats raise violence against women act
by Laurie Kellman, Associated Press, msnbc.msn.com -- 3/15/2012

Senate Democrats fired the latest political shot in what they're calling the Republican "war against women" Thursday, pushing to renew and expand a law that fights violence against women and pays to help victims. They dared GOP senators to vote against it.

"Protecting women against violence shouldn't be a partisan issue," Sen. Patty Murray, chairwoman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said from the Senate floor, where a group of female senators spoke in favor of the legislation.
[...]


There is NO Republican "War on Women" -- it is all just democratic posturing and few "unfortunate word choices" -- by their non-official leader -- that no body listens to anyways.  Yeah Right!

Republicans in Congress are fighting for women rights every single day -- fighting to restrict them, along with the rights of every other minority, that is NOT part of the entitled demographic --  of kindly, wise grandfatherly Patriarchs ...


Violence Against Women Act Receives Opposition from Republicans

by Melissa Stusinski, inquisitr.com -- March 15, 2012

[...] the Republican party is pushing back on the bill [VAWA], causing many women, both in government and out, to protest. [...]

[...]
The main reason for resistance from Republicans is that a few new provisions in the VAWA add protections for undocumented people (such as illegal immigrants), the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community, and also those who reside on Indian reservations. These proposed changes have made people, such as anti-immigrant Republican Jeff Sessions, cringe. Session stated that, “there are matters put on that bill that almost seem to invite opposition.”

[...] McConnell protested Thursday’s debate, reportedly because it was distracting from another issue that was on the agenda for discussion -- a small business bill that could potentially create jobs.

Do you think that Republicans' "war on women" is a reality?


The proof is in their actions. It may not be all out war -- BUT lending respect, opportunities, and equality support -- has very little to do with it! ... with their entitlement agenda;

-- with being a member in that exclusive the Club that is otherwise known as the G.O.P.



Grandiose Old Patriarchs



Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Thu Mar 15, 2012 at 07:51 PM PDT.

Also republished by Pink Clubhouse.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site