Skip to main content

"What kind of society do we want for our children?"

That is the simple, yet profound, question asked by Connecticut State Senator Gayle Slossberg (D-Milford) during debate on the pending legislation that would abolish the death penalty in Connecticut.  Her speech, in its entirety, is below the fold.  The State Senate answered with their votes:  by a margin of 20-16, Connecticut's Senate voted to join the ranks of every enlightened democracy on Planet Earth by abolishing the death penalty.

The bill is not perfect, and represents a painful compromise:  it is only prospective, so that the 11 human beings currently on Connecticut's Death Row awaiting execution by the State will still face the barbaric, arbitrary, and irreversible "ultimate penalty."  But, it is a start; and it appears to ensure that Connecticut will be the next state to join a rising tide of abolition that is spreading across our nation.

California will have an initiative on the fall ballot to repeal its death penalty.  Oregon's governor last year declared a moratorium on executions there.  Abolition efforts in Maryland and Montana gained steam this year.  The number of defendants sentenced to death, and the number of humans executed by the state, have steadily declined nationwide in recent years.  And recent nationwide polling shows a clear majority (61%) would choose a punishment other than the death penalty for murder.

Connecticut's vote--and the swelling tide of voices nationwide calling for repeal--demonstrate that we want a humane, just, life-respecting society for our children.  The momentum, already on our side, just picked up a little more steam today.

On to Sen. Slossberg's remarkable speech--worth reading in its entirety:

"A few years ago, I was waiting for the train to New York and I sat down on a bench next to an elderly man.  We started to chat. Elections were coming up, so our conversation naturally turned to politics and the state of our country.  We ran through the usual topics and then he turned to me and said something I have thought about over and over again ever since:  He said that between the tough economy, the rise of hate crimes, the vilification of this group or that by otherwise good, moral people and the seemingly chronic need to blame someone for society’s problems, he said he was afraid – not for himself, but for our children. It is only a short step from here to there, he said – to think of some people as less than human.  And once we think of people as less than human, it becomes okay to kill them and then what kind of society do we have?

For me, that is really the question of today’s debate: What kind of society do we have and what kind of society do we want for our children?

Like many of the people in this circle, I have agonized over the issue of the death penalty.  I have thought about it, debated it, researched it, talked to friends, family and strangers about it.  I have listened to the debate here today.  I appreciate and respect all of the different points of view that have been expressed.  I have spent a lot of time soul searching and lying awake at night thinking about all the facets of this issue.  Like Sen. Prague, it plagues me to think we could put an innocent person to death?  Does a moral society execute people?  As I have confronted this issue, and advanced my understanding and thinking, I have come to the conclusion that both the realities of the death penalty as it is applied and the moral issues it raises dictate that it be abolished.

Benjamin Franklin said “… it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.”  The good news is that by eliminating the death penalty, we are not letting any guilty person go free, but we are making sure that we do not execute someone who is innocent.  We know the criminal justice system makes mistakes.  We need only look to James Tillman right here in Connecticut to remember that innocent people are wrongly convicted.  We know that hundreds of people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence.  While we would like to believe that the criminal justice system is fair, that all the appeals will prevent an error, we know that is not the truth.  In Florida, where there is a death penalty, Former Florida Chief Justice Gerald Kogan stated after 45 years of working in the system, “There is no question in my mind…that convinces me that we certainly have…executed those not guilty of the crime for which they have been executed.”  Is that the society we want? Where we execute innocent people?  And if our society executes an innocent person, there is no possibility of fixing that error.   We can’t go back.  Haven’t  we then become the evil we are trying to eliminate?

The death penalty is not a deterrent. With all the studies that have been done, I am not convinced that criminals consider the death penalty when they are committing crimes.  In fact, states without a death penalty statute have significantly lower murder rates than their counterparts with the death penalty.   If you look at regions, the disparity becomes quite pronounced.  The South implements 80% of all executions in the country and has the highest murder rate, whereas, the Northeast implements less than 1% of all the executions and has the lowest murder rate in the nation.

In order to have a just society, we must have laws that apply equally to everyone yet the death penalty is meted out arbitrarily.  And if you don’t think that is the case in Connecticut, think again.  Last month, a few of us from the circle visited death row and the maximum security prison that houses the criminals who were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.  On our way there, we were handed a list of criminals and the crimes they had committed.  They were heinous, horrible, unspeakable acts – and I thought surely each of them deserved to die- and then I looked at the heading on the paper—these were the criminals who had gotten life without the possibility of parole!  The people on death row had also committed heinous, horrible crimes but there was virtually no way to predict who would have gotten death and who would have gotten life without the possibility of parole.  It was completely arbitrary, based on the luck of the draw; race, economic status, geography, ethnicity, a good lawyer…some unknown factor that made the jury more or less sympathetic.  Is that justice?

The death penalty isn’t necessary for public safety.  The criminal has already been caught and tried.  He is removed from society and no longer a threat to anyone’s safety. The death penalty doesn’t bring back the victims of their crimes.   We certainly can punish criminals and protect the public safety without a death penalty.  And please don’t get me wrong, these people have committed horrible crimes and they deserve to be punished.  With the amendment offered at the beginning of this debate, we will have a harsh, severe punishment, so horrible atleast one person chose to die instead.

While these arguments alone call for repeal of the death penalty, for me, the most compelling issue is the one people don’t like to talk about – the moral question – the question the old man on the train asked – What kind of society to do we have and what kind of society do we want to be?  

Last September, I watched the Republican presidential primary debates.  The moderator asked Governor Rick Perry how he felt about the 234 executions that he had presided over in Texas, more executions than any other Governor in modern times and before the Governor had even had a chance to respond, the crowd cheered.  The      crowd       cheered.  What kind of society cheers death?  I understand people who believe that the death penalty is justice – but to cheer?  And then to add insult to injury, Governor Perry was asked — do you ever struggle to sleep at night?  to which Perry responded – No struggle.  I do not struggle to sleep at night because the system is fair.  Again the crowd cheered.  Even if the criminal justice system was without error which we know it is not, what kind of society allows the systematic execution of people without even a second thought?

I believe that the death penalty calls to our basest instincts.  You only need to think about the crowd cheering at the debate about executions to know that the death penalty degrades our society.  Imposing the death penalty is really not about the criminal.  It is about how it makes us feel.  Like Sen. Musto, I can imagine that if someone harmed my family, I would want to harm them, too, but I want my public policy to be better than that.  Like the old man at the train, I fear for our society when we people can cheer at an execution or we feel nothing or we feel like it just doesn’t matter if society kills , even when that person is no longer a threat to our safety.  When we go down that path, we lose something as a society.

Last month, I received an angry letter from a man suffering from a fatal disease.  He wrote that he had never done anything wrong, yet because of his illness, he was sentenced to death and no one could commute his sentence.  Then he wrote, it isn’t fair that he, an innocent man, should get a death sentence and the legislature would consider eliminating the death penalty for murderers.  I could understand his anger and his belief that repealing the death penalty meant that we were showing compassion for murderers whereas no one could really show the same compassion for him.  I thought a long time about that letter until I realized that repealing the death penalty has nothing do with compassion or the criminal.   It has everything to do with what the act of killing does to US, the law abiding members of society.  Killers kill and they don’t feel bad about it.  What separates the good from evil is when most good, moral people do something bad, it makes them feel bad.  Most people are good, moral people, trying our best to abide by the laws and rules of our society.  We teach our children to be kind, to be honest, to reject violence.  So when we also say it is okay for us to kill when there is no longer any threat to our safety, we erode the very morals to which we aspire. It is a small step from here to there, said the old man.  It is like a smoldering ember that slowly burns a hole in all that is good in our society.

So what kind of society do we want for our children?

We know our criminal justice system is broken.  We know all the arguments that logically support repeal.  But for me, the most compelling reason to reject the death penalty is to set ourselves on the path to the kind of society we want for our future.

I never saw the old man from the train again, but if I did, I would like to tell him this:   I want something better for our families.   I want to know that in the face of terrible evil, we will hold on tighter to our humanity; that when our faith in each other is challenged, we will work harder to fulfill our obligations to one another as human beings; that we will stand for justice for all; that we will raise each other up, and not descend to the level of criminals.  We cannot confront darkness with darkness and expect to have light.

 I hope that one day, when my children look back on this vote, they will view it with pride and know that today we took a step towards being a more civilized and just society for all.  I am proud to support the repeal of the death penalty."

9:01 AM PT: The measure looks likely to pass Connecticut's House; and Governor Dannel Malloy has promised to sign it into law.

Originally posted to drnononono on Thu Apr 05, 2012 at 07:28 AM PDT.

Also republished by Abolish the Death Penalty.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thank you for this important diary. I think (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    drnononono, 4Freedom, laserhaas

    the answer to the question posed by Sen. Slossberg about what kind of society cheers death is a society that is mealy and afraid.  I say mealy because the same people who cheer death and are willing to send our troops to theirs are often the same people who rail against abortion, demanding that any thread of life be brought into a world where some will end up cheered to their deaths by the same people.  I say afraid because unlike people in some other nations have found a way to co-exist with "the others." ( I take note of New Zealand where intermarriage between Anglos and Maoris is becoming thoroughgoing.)  Here the ongoing support for the death penalty seems rooted in racism because our prisoner population is disproportionately minority.  The remedy lies in achieving connectedness with our fellow man which will dilute fear and allow us to develop clarity about what our morality should be.  It's clear our generation is not ready, but I think the next one is.  

    Romney went to France instead of serving in our military, got rich chop-shopping US businesses and eliminating US jobs, off-shored his money in the Cayman Island"s, and now tells us to "Believe in America."

    by judyms9 on Thu Apr 05, 2012 at 07:58:02 AM PDT

  •  I can hardly believe (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    4Freedom, drnononono, mythatsme, laserhaas

    I'm the first person to rec this diary after two hours. How apathetic has this community become?

    We are all in the same boat on a stormy sea, and we owe each other a terrible loyalty. -- G.K. Chesterton

    by Keith Pickering on Thu Apr 05, 2012 at 09:26:28 AM PDT

  •  A society that murders its own citizens is not a (4+ / 0-)

    mature society. The death penalty is the ultimate punishment for a society that metes out vengeance rather than justice.

    For murdering a citizen, even when guilty, prevents society from exacting the lifetime of remorse the guilty would suffer. It is also barbaric, as most civilized societies have found that they function better without the death penalty than when it is exacted.

    The death penalty fosters neither justice nor crime prevention. As such, it is useless tool to deter crime. The only satisfaction it brings is to those who prefer vengeance to justice.

    This is not a good example for our children. I hope Connecticut abolishes its death penalty.

  •  Excellent news. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    drnononono, laserhaas

    He who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.

    by Sophie Amrain on Thu Apr 05, 2012 at 12:26:13 PM PDT

  •  Here is why Capital Punishment (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    drnononono, mythatsme, laserhaas

    should be abolished in this country forever. I have a friend in Berlin who tells me many reasons why his country did this:

    Why Did Germany Abolish the Death Penalty?

    It's common knowledge in Germany that the inclusion of Article 102 of the Grundgesetz (Basic Law), which abolishes the death penalty, was motivated by disgust at the excessive use of the death penalty in Germany by the National Socialist regime. During the twelve years of Nazi dictatorship, over 30,000 death sentences were handed down -- in addition to the mass extermination directed at 'undesirable' populations. Dozens of Germans have recited to me the some version of the standard sound-bite concerning the Parliamentary Council's 1949 decision to call for the abolition of the death penalty in the Basic Law: "As the extent of Nazi atrocities and abuse of the death penalty became clear, everyone was horrified, and the founders of the Federal Republic of Germany decided the State could never again be allowed the power to kill."

    I have always felt that this country should adhere and to  follow Germany`s lead. This country has killed too many people in the name of State`s sanction murder.

    Old men tell same old stories

    by Ole Texan on Thu Apr 05, 2012 at 12:35:29 PM PDT

  •  Thanks for this one Dr nononono , Had it in que (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    and was going to do a much shorter version.

    Each state - is a chance to get the Fed to try to look like a hero - to make it National.........

    If you desire a better world - be a better person.

    by laserhaas on Fri Apr 06, 2012 at 08:01:23 AM PDT

  •  Does anyone know (0+ / 0-)

    when the House is scheduled to take up the repeal bill?  

    (Blue states should have blue policies).

    Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity. @DavidKaib

    by David Kaib on Sun Apr 08, 2012 at 09:13:58 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site