Skip to main content

When I was a kid, to me, millionaire meant someone who had amassed net wealth of a million dollars. As my life enters it's 8th decade, a lot of inflation has happened and now a millionaire is someone with an adjusted gross income of one million dollars or more in a year. I just paid our taxes. I can say with complete confidence that our annual household income will never get close to a million dollars, though we do expect our federal taxes to be going up significantly after this year.  

Our particular tax household is temporarily (until retirement in a few years) doing well enough that a small part of our adjusted gross income lies north of the income threshold that will see an increase in marginal tax rate when the Bush Tax Cuts expire at the end of 2012. Our federal taxes will also rise if the Scrap the Cap movement in Congress succeeds in repealing the FICA limit that caps our liability. I strongly support both the Expiration and Scrap initiatives, even though the measures will cost my household a lot of money (for a year or two, until we retire and fall back below the income threshold). I suppose that makes us a little like the benighted people of Kansas in Thomas Frank's book, What's the Matter with Kansas, who vote against their personal economic interests because of social issues. I do the same for the sake of a little economic justice in the tax code.

After I finished my taxes I followed the advice in Joan McCarter's front page piece yesterday and checked to see how the millionaires were doing compared to the Left household. Read on to see how the results convinced me more than ever that the Buffet Rule/Reagan Rule, must be implemented as a matter of simple tax progression and economic justice.

Nobody who makes more money than we do should pay less federal tax. Yet, as it turns out, even though our household is far ahead in earned income of the average American household, we come up worse off than those average households in terms of number of millionaires paying less federal tax. The White House site with a Buffet Rule calculator says this:  

About 55,000 millionaires pay a lower effective tax rate than millions of middle-income Americans.

How many millionaires paid a lower effective tax rate than you? Find your Buffett Number using the calculator on the right.

When I ran the numbers from our tax return, the calculator told me that 56,300 millionaires enjoyed a lower Buffet Number than our household. It suggested to me that our effective tax rate is really high compared to millionaires, if we're doing that much worse against them than the average American household.

The answer is not to lower, or even to refuse to raise our taxes. Scrap the Cap will solve future Social Security problems and expiration of the Bush Tax cuts on higher earning households is well neigh inevitable. But none of that is enough. Millionaires must not enjoy a lower effective tax rate than my hard working household. Millionaires didn't succeed that much without the support of the community and commonwealth and needn't be coddled at tax time. They have large disposable incomes. Unless they are idiots they can afford to pay their fair share. I want my household to pay its fair share, but I sure as hell want those doing even better to pitch in commensurate with their success as well.  

President Obama has taken an unequivocal stance on the Buffet Rule. Every Kossack, from the most suspicious Obama doubter to the most besotted Obamabot, should support, call Congress, call the White House, comment, diary  and vote to convince the next Congress and the present one to enact a millionaire surtax rule, or Buffett Rule, or Reagan Rule or Tax Justice Rule No. 1 or whatever you name it. Let's get 'er done.  


I Used The White House Widget to Check My Numbers

33%3 votes
11%1 votes
11%1 votes
33%3 votes
11%1 votes

| 9 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Scrap the Cap, people! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    asterkitty, Ice Blue

    Bumpersticker: GOP. Cheering Death. Booing Soldiers. Join Us.

    by LeftOfYou on Sat Apr 14, 2012 at 02:21:26 PM PDT

  •  Yeah, I'm doing better (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Ice Blue, LeftOfYou, kareylou

    than the diarist, because my AGI was only about 130% of poverty. Only 11,000+ millionaires are paying a lower tax rate than me. That's all.

    Signed the petition too. It's about fairness. Once upon a time that was a basic American value.

    curious portal - to a world of paintings, lyric-poems, art writing, and graphic and web design

    by asterkitty on Sat Apr 14, 2012 at 02:58:24 PM PDT

  •  I'm on SSI so I don't pay any federal (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    income taxes.  However, I live in Wisconsin.  You hear of how our governer Snotty Walker was going to lower our property taxes?  Well, mine went up.  I make less than $10K per year.  Normally I get anywhere from $600 to $800 in homestead tax rebates.  This year I'm only going to get $450 even though my home value has gone slowly but steadily up.

    I know, the whole economy is hurting.  I wouldn't mind paying more but Walker is throwing our tax dollars like a drunken sailor to all his rich cronies.

    Never meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer.--Bruce Graham

    by Ice Blue on Sat Apr 14, 2012 at 04:12:54 PM PDT

  •  This is incorrect (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib, johnny wurster
    ... and now a millionaire is someone with an adjusted gross income of one million dollars or more in a year.
    A millionaire is still someone with a net worth of a million dollars, always has been.

    Personally I find it disturbing that the supposed reality based side of the political spectrum has chosen to redefine it to suit their political agenda. Railing against "millionaires" is always good political theater but the truth is that earning a million in any particular (or multiple) year(s) does not make one a millionaire.

  •  My taxes will go down next year, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    now that I've moved outta NYC.  The tax bill there is insane.  I wouldn't say it drove me out, but it was near the top of the list of "cons" when I was putting together the list of pros and cons.

  •  The right is now (0+ / 0-)

    yucking it up over Warren Buffet being sued for unpaid taxes, and basically using that as proof that taxes shouldn't be raised on millionaires.

    liberal bias = failure to validate or sufficiently flatter the conservative narrative on any given subject

    by RockyMtnLib on Sat Apr 14, 2012 at 06:28:47 PM PDT

  •  Yep. (0+ / 0-)
    Millionaires didn't succeed that much without the support of the community and commonwealth and needn't be coddled at tax time.
    The idea that they "did it all on their own" is a fantasy.

    "A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself." - Joseph Pulitzer

    by CFAmick on Sun Apr 15, 2012 at 07:44:39 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site