Skip to main content

Reports of Murdoch’s questioning by the British government on Wednesday had the media boss asserting that while he disagreed with the phone hacking and e-mail hacks, he was in favor of their goals—he said that when people put themselves out in the public eye, they deserve to be scrutinized.   This is true but the modifier is the degree of importance to society by those who are out front—that combined with the level of scrutiny itself.

Much of what Murdoch approves of is junk.  He makes money off of the junk, feeds the brains of youth with his junk, and so is in favor of it.  Now he’s a victim of the type of crap he has so long peddled.  It is by his own standards now that he is being treated.  And it’s a great little morality play for the public to see.  From what I’ve read here at DK, there are plenty of people ready and willing to twist the knife as the Murdoch tales unfurls.  Good for them.  He has hurt this country a great deal I believe.

He of course, didn’t admit to knowing anything about the illegal practices his employees were using.  But when the boss tells people what his goals are, the employees usually respond.  Clearly it was he who set the standards for his company—and clearly he is to blame.  Whether he was only the steersman at the helm when the big boat ran into the rock and ice—or was the captain, laying drunk in his cabin, he was the man in charge and should be out of that position for the public’s safety.  That he didn’t use his media influence to drive his business dealings is just not believable.  People in business do exactly that!  The real legal question is did he use soft or hard extortion to accomplish this

I’ve never understood really why people just don’t quit when they’re ahead and can get themselves free of the game.  Donald Trump makes a fortune then goes on to play an ass on TV?  Murdoch wins all that he and his family could ever really use, but decides to piss away his reputation rather then work to set it in the hall of great men?  All I can figure is that these types of people were just dumb-lucky to begin with and just plain dumb at the end.

The debate about what constitutes “fair game” for reporters continues.  If a person’s work is satisfactory, do we have the right to stick our noses in their private lives?  Hell no.  It’s bad for the culture to see the indignity of it—just as there is a psychological effect in witnessing other forms of violence.  Mob bosses and other little tyrants create a climate of fear, Murdoch understands this very well.  But some members of the media are really nothing more then slobs making make money off this crap.  And the famous who court the notion that “bad press is better then no press” to publicize their latest dull offerings, are even more pathetic.  They are like chimps trained to perform in a rude circus act.

It’s so great that we have journalists with the guts to stand up for more then just “all of the truth that sells”.  Curses to the rest of the slime.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wilderness voice, MKSinSA

    "It's only a movie"--1960's era PR Man for B-grade Hollywood flicks

    by williamjustin on Thu Apr 26, 2012 at 11:10:23 AM PDT

  •  Just to clarify (0+ / 0-)

    Lord Justice Leveson is not a member of the government. His inquiry is separate even if set up by the government.

    Other hearings were conducted by the Culture, Media, Sports and Olympics Select Committee. These committees consist of backbenchers from all the main parties. The exercise a scrutiny over the work of government, rather like US House Committees except all but one are responsible for a specific government department. The exception is the co-ordinating committee which overseas the work of the Cabinet Office (the Prime Minister) and whose members are the chairs of the departmental committees/

    Fight poverty, oppression, hunger, ignorance, disease and aggression wherever they occur.

    by Lib Dem FoP on Thu Apr 26, 2012 at 11:57:50 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site