We are in the battle for the POTUS. This Diarist, Blogger and Website owner has been fighting Mitt Romney, Bain and Goldman Sachs for more than a decade. You would think I'd find vast friends here. Instead I am accused of being wacked, a CT and even some powerful among us consistently calls for my being HR'd. Never once am I spoken to in a gentile manner with a reasonable discussion about the truth.
What is transpiring, is attorneys despise anyone who questions the bad faith acts of other attorneys. No, purportedly, they have no skin in the game - they just want me to shut up, sit down and quietly accept the thievery of my public company (eToys) - the crushing of my career and the larceny of my lifes savings too.
But, I have to decline. They are constantly pushing towards the goal of getting me thrown off of DailyKos. I would miss many or you and some will miss me. It will be Daily Kos's loss and your chance to participate in something special. I've got the goods on Bain, Goldman Sachs, Mitt Romney and their bad faith public officials and organized Bankruptcy Ring attorneys. What I will provide below the fold, is some proof of what tenacity, temerity and unrelenting pursuit of truth and justice can do with only a few.
Think of how much WE could do with the Many!
Facts Undeniable
My contention is that crimes have transpired and are still transpiring. Mitt Romney's camp knows they are exposed. They want this evidence buried under the ocean. The question therefore is - why do my fellows who want Mitt Romney to lose - also want Mitt Romney to win in the eToys case? That is because of power, influence and the circling of the wagons to protect the legal profession at All Costs.
You will see the items below that are all public docket records. They speak truth on their own - I am only pointing you to the links and taking excerpts from therein and asked you to make your own conclusions.
eToys case is Not Yet Closed - just assaulted by Fraud on the Court and Justice is Obstructed
.
1.
United States Trustee States Paul Traub Perpetrated Fraud on the Court.
Fraud on the court involves more than a Ponzi schemer like Madoff perpetrating fraud. It is listed as a Fraud against the system of justice by officers of the court (a key element) that is so heinous & egregious - there's NO statute of limitations thereon.
Precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court of In re Hazel Atlas Glass - a case that was lost by a party due to "officer of the court" frauds. The U.S. Supreme Court permitted the case to be re-opened after 9 years.
Rightfully so, Attorneys at Law are deemed honorable - Until - they are found to be dishonorable. When they do lie under oath, their lies to the judicial process cause a great price. They may get away with it for a LONG time. However - thanks to the US Supreme Court and In re Hazel Atlas; we can still get justice - even when the crooks get away with it due to corrupt power, money & influence for more than a decade.
Thus, it is a well established that Fraud on the Court is reprehensible and must be dealt with harshly. In our eToys case, that involves Mitt Romney (the CEO of Bain Capital in 2001), Paul Traub, Goldman Sachs, Romney's Bain & Kay Bee Toys and their cohort law firm MNAT. Both the US Trustee and the Chief Justice in the eToys cited the Fraud on the Court case of In re Hazel Atlas Glass. But the Asst US Trustee (Frank Perch) resigned after he emailed me his brief with this statement of Hazel Atlas case nestled inside his brief - as if he knew they would defeat me for a time - but I have the power to rectify. See part 29 of the Legal Brief by theUS Trustee Motion to Disgorge Traub Bonacquist & Fox $1.6 million (cause the truth hurts). As it states;
29. Fraud upon the court, as distinguished from common law fraud, equitably tolls the
time for seeking to set aside a judgment or order. The purpose is not to avoid prejudice to the rights of parties but to protect the integrity of the court. In Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S.Ct. 997 (1944), the Supreme Court explained that the inquiry focuses on whether the alleged fraud harmed the judicial process, not on whether it harmed a party:
- [T]ampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown
here [counsel fraudulently created evidence and introduced it trial] involves far
more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up
to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot
complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it
cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always
await upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the
agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and
helpless victims of deception and fraud.
Then, while only look a just a few, of the 100 crimes we now can provide public docket record proof of - the United States Trustee made this conclusion in
part 35 of their testimonial brief. It not only denotes that "fraud on the court" transpired - but it is the 2nd time the United States Trustee remarks that he had discussions ("forewarned") the parties not to violate the Code.
As it states that Fraud on the Court transpired in the US T's words verbatim;
And as discussed earlier in this Motion, TBF had engaged in discussions with the Office of the United States Trustee about replacement officers of the debtors, and was aware of the UST’s concern that the replacement officers not be related to any of the professionals employed in the case. This, it is respectfully submitted, is all of the intent needed to demonstrate that TBF’s Rule 2014 disclosure violation was a fraud upon the court.
emphasis added.
Thus, the questions that begs are
-
Do those who rob the vault by deceit, get to say I'm sorry and keep what they are stealing? Should Paul Traub get to keep money he stole by lying under oath 17 times and intentional fraud on the court? Those that agree he should get to keep illicit gains and remain in control - please raise your hands?
2. The Wall Street Reported on the Story and Resignation of DOJ Friedman
They have gotten away with these crimes for a decade plus now. But we did give them a great scare more than once. Prior to Murdoch cleaning house with his acquisition of the Wall Street Journal - Bain tried to buy it and failed. In the meantime this story of July 25, 2005 slipped through the cracks - after the reporters worked 4 years on the eToys cases. It is reprinted with permission by the Pittsburgh Post Gazette here
http://www.post-gazette.com/...
Those the Wall Street Reporter Joe Pereira spelled my name wrong and juxtaposed it (I am Laser Steven Haas). He did point out that I [Laser] the liquidator prepared for this battle, is that (I studied the Law) upon the Deparment of Justice's website;
Stephen Laser Haas, a liquidator who has helped sell off some eToys assets, also agreed to help. He says he prepared "by perusing the U.S. Justice Department's Web site."
The question that begs here is
-
the Wall Street Journal promised to do the Entire story - for me giving them exclusive. Do you believe they have told the Whole story? If so please raise your hand?
3.
6 Months After They confess to Lying Under Oath - Judges Says it is Not Perjury
What you and I do is, we are decent people who trust the Law and system of justice to work for us. We believe in the society based upon the Code & Rule of Law. What Lawyers do, is they want us, the masses who are lucky if we make $15 per hour and work 60 hours per week. To accept their equation that they know much more what is better for us - and to pay them $500 per hour for that knowledge.
Federal Judges get paid $140,000 per year. Yet, with all that vast education, and those astute counselors getting $500 to $1000 per hour to practice before them - a Chief Justice (MFW) determined that confessions to lying under oath 34 times, over 4 years - after being instructed (having conversations with the United States Trustee) - is really no big deal and most certainly NOT Perjury. That is what "Legal Prowess" gets you. Please see pages 50 to 52 in this OPINION (that quotes In re Hazel Atlas on page ) that states this conclusion;
http://www.deb.uscourts.gov/...
Therefore, the failure to disclose cannot be considered perjury or any other bankruptcy crime. Consequently, the Court finds no reason to refer this matter to the U.S. Attorney.
What is absurd, is the fact that the Judge took 6 months to address the crimes, that (speciously) headed off my Sept 2005 appeal when another judge ruled that the bad faith parties get to keep my money.
Also totally incongruous, is the fact that the Judge simply tosses out the wind, the fact that both MNAT and Paul Traub confessed to lying to her 34 times and that Barry Gold (Paul Traub's now ADMITTED - partner) - said to the court, to get his position of trust over $50 million dollars - that he Declares "Under Penalty of Perjury" that eToys contracts for the federal court's rulings were drafted in "extensive" arm's length good faith agreements between Debtor (Barry Gold) and Creditors (represented by Barry Gold's secret partner Paul Traub).
The questions that beg are
-
When a Chief Justice rules that lying under oath 34 times - is not proof of perjury and refuses to refer the matter to the US Attorneys office - is that a proper conclusion? All who believe that lying under oath - about being partners - while paying each other $10 million in fees is not perjury to perpetrate fraud on the court; Please raise your hands?
4.
Delaware US Attorney Connolly was a partner at MNAT law firm
Now, for those of you that don't remember, in the Bernie Madoff case, there's Mr. Markopolos. He reported on the Bernie Madoff case. He had suspicions and wanted the SEC to look into. They did not and even have confessed now - that they destroyed the case files. The difference here is, I do have proof of bad faith acts and I am reporting monies stolen from me - while my enemy just happens to be attorneys and companies that belong to the GOP guy asking for your vote to be POTUS.
We reported the bad faith acts - with their confessions to lying under oath and working for multiple parties - at the Direct detriment to their client (eToys) - to the Delaware United States Attorney Colm Connolly. For 7 years, from 2001 to 2008 - he refused to investigate/ prosecute the case. Including the refusal to prosecute the MNAT law firm. Then we find out, in 2007, that Colm Connolly was a PARTNER of MNAT in 2001 - the very year the crimes began. See his Dept of Justice Office of Legal Policy Resume here;
http://www.justice.gov/...
Thus the question that begs is
-
Do you think it is okay that DE US Attorney Colm Connolly refused to investigate his partners and his partners clients? All who think it is Okay - please raise your hands?
5.
Public Corruption Task Force is Shut Down
Unlike the Madoff affair, we have continued to report this case everywhere. They have destroyed me and mine often. The eToys shareholder working with me (Alber) mentioned in the Wall Street Journal article, had to under go Brain surgery and shoot/ kill an intruder who has permanently disabled him. Thousands of people lost billions of dollars in eToys, Kay Bee, Stage Stores and more; continuing to do so even now. Despite confessions to lying under oath Intentionally.
We pointed out the conflicts of interest of Colm Connolly as US Attorney in December 2007. 12 weeks later, the California US Attorney who received those evidences, summarily shut down the DOJ's Public Corruption Task Force and Threatened career US Attorneys that he would tarnish their reputation - if they challenged the reasons why he did so.
See this Los Angeles Times story "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors"
It states;
They said O'Brien also threatened to tarnish their reputations if they challenged the official explanation for the unit's dismantling in conversations with reporters. Members of the unit contacted by The Times either spoke on the condition that they not be named or declined to comment. Several said they wanted to talk about the situation but feared reprisals if they did so
Thus, the questions that beg are
.
Should the US Attorneys who betray us in this manner, be permitted to get away with it? Do we not deserve a Congressional investigation into what really happened here? Are such betrayals of the public's trust - Too Big to Jail. All those who think that threatening career Asst US Attorneys to keep their mouths shut - is okay - please raise your hands?
CONCLUSION
.
There are people running amuck, who do not want these facts to come out in a full review of their relevant combined worth. They want me, victim of all this, to simply shut up, lick my wounds and accept the fact the system has done me in.
To them a I say that they are FUBAR'd
One of the greatest sig lines here states that principal to which I stay upon. It is by none other than the great Meteor Blades - who has shown no like for me - but did convert me to this realm. He denotes the very thing I do. When faced with overwhelming odds of those who 'claim" to be on your side and yet seek your rejection, silence and submission - just show them what is real.
They say one thing, that they are Liberal's and Progressives, but seek to destroy this Liberal/ Progressive person who is simply fighting everything we are suppose to fight and THE Person that we MUST defeat the most (Mitt Romney). I am doing what I say - to the disdain of many that use to call me friends. Abandoned by most and heart broke by such. I am still here eating crow and Begging with you all to Watch Out - this is what Mitt the Pitts DOES. He benefits from this items as he was CEO of Bain Capital in 2001 and still gets millions from Bain Capital every year. They need me silenced and it looks like they can even count on their adversary's upper ranks to do their dirty work for them.
They are right though. I am not the one to tell this story. I do not write well, was label dumb in school, failed "English and am too emotional. I am not the one who should be telling my story. Cause no one listens until I win. Which may never come.
YOU Should be telling this story - or at least digging into the facts here.
It is ALL public docket records and they can't handle these truths.
Remember what Meteor's sig line says;
" Don't tell me what you believe,
show me what you do and I will tell you what you believe. "
I am telling you that federal courts are corrupt and Bankruptcy Courts Chapter 11's are an evil tool of the 1% to fleece us illegally. Using bad faith judges, bad faith Dept of Justice personnel and obfuscating logic like Lying Under Oath 34 times over 4 years while getting $10 million in fees - is Not a Crime and NOT PERJURY - All those who think that is true - Please raise your hands?
For all you others, here is the words of AG Ashcroft who said that the Judicial Branh of our government is "organized crime" - while speaking about Corrupt bankruptcy federal judges in Collusion with high ranking members of the US Trustee's office. This was, of course, before John Ashcroft received a $50 million dollar No Bid Contract for US Attorney Chris Christie;
http://petters-fraud.com/...
These hearings on judicial conduct stem from the 1980 Judicial Act which originally wasn't intended for, but did manage to immorally and by definition, fraudulently put judges above the law. For 27 years now, those who look to this branch of government for relief have been disappointed time after time again, they have been exacerbated in many instances by judges who threaten the very lives of those who petition their courts for relief. Our own former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft condemned the judicial branch of government by characterizing this branch as "organized crime".
- He [Ashcroft] writes: "Bankruptcy court corruption is not just a matter of bankruptcy trustees in collusion with corrupt bankruptcy judges. The corruption is supported, and justice hindered by high ranking officials in the United States Trustee Program. The corruption has advanced to punishing any and all who mention the criminal acts of trustees and organized crime operating through the United States Bankruptcy Courts. As though greed is not enough, the trustees, in collusion with others, intentionally go forth to destroy lives. Exemptions provided by law are denied debtors. Cases are intentionally, and unreasonably kept open for years. Parties in cases are sanctioned to
discourage them from pursuing justice. Contempt of court powers are misused to coerce litigants into agreeing with extortion demands. This does not ensure integrity and restore public confidence. The American public, victimized and held hostage by ankruptcy court corruption,have no where to turn."
I am inviting you to take the credit for helping to take down Mitt Romney, Bain and Goldman Sachs. All you have to do is spread these truths and write about them in your own way. You can OCCUPY the bad faith parties here and make a difference and be a part of something special and good. A noble quest to end Mitt Romney's Bain entity for benefiting from lies under oath by officers of the court in a system that even the Attorney General of the United States has gone on the record and said is Corrupt.
Or, you can simply raise your hand and help those who want me gone!