Skip to main content

We are loving our Social Security checks, which have arrived in our lives just in time to help pay my wife's cancer treatment bills.

What we are not loving are efforts to change Social Security and our defined benefit Teacher Retirement fund into money in the pocket of the greedy 1%.

Thanks to the Strengthen Social Security page on  Facebook

learned that CNBC is blatantly pushing a poll  for the privatization of Social Security, and even have a stationary ad from Prudential at the top of the page the poll  is on that really makes  want to throw up:
Learn about new lifetime income guarantees.
Solutions for the workplace.

This takes you to another header which says  

Restoring Pension Era Predictability to a Defined Contribution World.
Prudential is but one of the companies who are coming for our Social Security, and for our Teacher Retirement Fundto boot.

What amazes me is that they really think people have so quickly forgotten how many of their relatives, friends and neighbors have to now work until they die because they lost it all in the recent crash?


So hey, kossacks, if you have a few minutes why not take the [lame] CNBC poll?

CNBC Poll: Should Social Security Be Privatized?


Join the FB page, write/call Congress, let 'em all know 'Jobs, Not Social Security Cuts.'

And please come back and comment if you take the poll, reporting whether or not the Prudential ad is still at the top.  


Originally posted to divineorder on Tue May 01, 2012 at 10:40 AM PDT.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders.


Do you support the CNBC poll seeking to privatize social security

5%2 votes
82%29 votes
8%3 votes
2%1 votes

| 35 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site