Skip to main content


Illustration by Bob Staake

With the launch of new boycott site http://stoprush.net - a database tool to organize the boycott of Rush Limbaugh, the right - and Rush himself - are stepping up efforts to dismiss and marginalize this movement.

But we know we've had great effect - to the tune of millions of dollars in lost revenues.

The Wall Street Journal published an opinion yesterday criticizing the movement by calling it a "secondary boycott," and dismissing the boycott as "harmful to civil society."

All these examples are what are called "secondary boycotts"—attempts to influence the actions of the target by exerting pressure on a third party.
...
But secondary boycotts have long been recognized as harmful to civil society. They rend the social fabric by making it difficult for people to simply live their lives. The boycott of contributors to the American Legislative Exchange Council, for example, came about because state lawmakers who are members of the council introduced bills requiring voters to present a photo ID before voting. Polls consistently show majority support for voter ID laws, but such laws are strongly opposed by some on the left, who argue that they disenfranchise voters.
...
Similarly, opponents of same-sex marriage—who appear to be roughly equal if not superior in number to proponents—could start boycotting companies that contribute to pro-gay rights organizations. Soon everyone is boycotting everyone, trade is restricted, political tensions increase, and life is generally unpleasant. Secondary boycotts create an environment in which political conflict, rather than peaceful trade, dominates our relationships.
Below the fold, I'll dissect this opinion piece as utter nonsense, and why this movement is important and effective.

Harmful to civil society. Boycotting everyone. Trade is restricted. Political tensions increase. Life is generally unpleasant.

I'm sorry, Mr. Smith. Did we disturb your tea?

1. Corrections in society frequently result in a bit of uproar. That's just how it is. We'd all like it to be easy and painless, but history shows us otherwise.

2. Restricted trade? I guarantee you, everyone will continue to eat and go about their lives and continue purchasing the goods they need. However, our dollars are the biggest vote we have, and we will use them. In the spirit of capitalism, on which America was founded, companies will have to deal with the market conditions presented to them. Small businesses understand this intimately better than huge corporations, because they have to represent themselves in the community, and live or die based on local reputation.

3. Secondary boycotts don't work? I say ask Glenn Beck that question. I also remind Mr. Smith about a guy named Gandhi who brought the British government to its knees over a fabric boycott.

4. Boycotting everyone. This certainly could be possible. But as we've seen with other boycotts, if there isn't a strong enough boycott, business will continue as usual. This argument takes care of itself. Once again, we vote with our dollars. If enough dollars vote against our dollar vote, then we lose. What could be more democratic?

The interesting thing about Mr. Smith's article, is the nation's largest financial newspaper felt it worthy enough to include on their opinion pages. If these boycotts were just a nuisance as described, then why would the Wall Street Journal even bother printing this piece?

Even more interesting is his examples with the American Legislative Exchange Council, aka ALEC:

Many corporate donors to the American Legislative Exchange Council, however, are also corporate donors to the Congressional Black Caucus, which strongly opposes voter ID laws. If secondary boycotts become the norm, supporters of voter ID—whom, if we are to believe the polls, vastly outnumber critics—could decide to boycott these companies.
Am I to understand the argument here is: don't engage in these boycotts because you will hurt the causes you believe in?

Corporate donors will contribute to whomever they want, unless it is unpopular. If a corporation is boycotted for contributing to ALEC, it does not follow the corporation would halt their contributions to the Congressional Black Caucus as a result. Logical fallacy.

This opinion piece exposes their real fear: they're terrified the same kind of boycott will materialize against ALEC. And one way or another, it will - because campaigns like stopbeck.com and stoprush.net are community efforts, by millions of people, and not a random activist or organization. But ALEC is a subject for a whole other diary.

I love this next argument:

Boycotts are particularly unattractive when intended to squelch speech. In each of the previous examples, boycotts were organized to harm the target economically so that the target would pressure the original speaker to, well, shut up. The power of ideas is abandoned for the power of economic coercion.
How many times have I heard this completely nonsensical argument?

The Rush Limbaugh show is a commercial for-profit business. It is NOT free speech. Period.

Let me repeat this: The Rush Limbaugh show is a commercial for-profit business.

How many times had Rush himself said he's an entertainer and not a political operative? It is true his show is a product, and this is important to remember.

Ever been disappointed when a favorite show on TV get canceled? If the audience isn't there to sell ads, the show goes away. Ask any CPA how this works. By Mr. Smith's logic, we're horribly guilty of squelching the ideas and free speech of many directors, writers, and other would-be Limbaughs. Whether the content is humor, fantasy, or political commentary - it doesn't matter. We're talking about the life cycle of a commercial product.

A boycott is a very simple animal designed to effect an outcome.

In civil society, the people decide what is and is not acceptable behavior. Screaming "Fire!" in a movie theater isn't acceptable. Hitting another person isn't acceptable. Saying the F word on the airwaves isn't acceptable. Public nudity isn't acceptable. We correct uncivil behavior with fines, and other punishments such as jail time.

If my child spoke the kinds of words Rush Limbaugh does on a daily basis, he would be sent to the principal's office, and likely expelled from school. At a minimum, he'd be given time out.

As a mom, I do not tolerate this kind of behavior from my child - for his benefit, and for the benefit of civilized society.

But in America, we reward this kind of speech with a nationally syndicated radio show and millions of dollars.

If you read this as suggesting Rush Limbaugh is uncivilized, yes, I will go on record saying this. Rush Limbaugh is uncivil.

As a society, we can correct these kinds of imbalances with the tools we have available to us. Financially, we can put Rush Limbaugh in time out, or expel him from the airwaves all together.

Originally posted to TBTM Julie on Fri May 04, 2012 at 10:41 AM PDT.

Also republished by Sluts.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

RepackRider, Renee, Sylv, Alma, RF, Lawdog, Radiowalla, Odysseus, melo, lanshark, ogre, teacherken, DMo, glitterscale, badger, tiponeill, Minnesota Deb, Troutfishing, eeff, rubyr, jnfr, Bob Friend, niemann, davelf2, Paulie200, chipoliwog, cinnamon68, 88kathy, justme, brillig, understandinglife, whenwego, ask, KMc, boadicea, themank, mkfarkus, gakke, chimpy, bobinson, ivote2004, bincbom, splashy, Cedwyn, Quege, sockpuppet, Symbolman, hoolia, potatohead, JimWilson, wdrath, DSC on the Plateau, defluxion10, lcrp, JayBat, zerelda, tomjones, NapaJulie, poemworld, lyvwyr101, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, davidkc, humphrey, ExStr8, NoMoreLies, LarisaW, klamothe, stlawrence, Chinton, OpherGopher, Erik the Red, sc kitty, Big River Bandido, KnotIookin, one of 8, Blue Jean, ChemBob, YucatanMan, Dobber, Laurence Lewis, ratzo, eru, cfk, majcmb1, Sun Tzu, Fury, rosabw, Ice Blue, peteri2, Little Lulu, markdd, Sandino, Ozzie, sodalis, coolbreeze, Cory Bantic, Brian B, Alan Arizona, zozie, begone, dedwords, Shirl In Idaho, myboo, cybersaur, 417els, Clytemnestra, tobendaro, Themistoclea, Russgirl, dopper0189, Cartoon Peril, Dvalkure, kestrel9000, smokeymonkey, Shakludanto, twigg, agnostic, gatorcog, JVolvo, plf515, Preston S, hlsmlane, vivian darkbloom, anninla, onionjim, CA Nana, doingbusinessas, fiddlingnero, SD Goat, Delta Overdue, AllanTBG, Quicklund, Aaa T Tudeattack, BentLiberal, ammasdarling, One Pissed Off Liberal, FlamingoGrrl, dotsright, Cronesense, Habitat Vic, devis1, ColoTim, offgrid, Positronicus, karmsy, RisingSign, HeartlandLiberal, Matt Z, certainot, bnasley, rantsposition, Seneca Doane, Moderation, gchaucer2, Librarianmom, RudiB, uciguy30, GeorgeXVIII, spearfish, zorp, South Park Democrat, TomP, chicago minx, gundyj, Clio2, TX Freethinker, MikePhoenix, OleHippieChick, Sixty Something, Tchrldy, Involuntary Exile, dadadata, elwior, Sharon Wraight, jamess, mikeconwell, Lujane, pamelabrown, RandomNonviolence, Jeff Y, catly, petulans, luckylizard, My Spin, msdobie, Karl Rover, magicsister, tristan57, dmhlt 66, watercarrier4diogenes, shortgirl, CA coastsider, maxcat06, legendmn, maggiejean, Sun dog, Bule Betawi, rubyclaire, bobatkinson, Nebraskablue, Methinks They Lie, janmtairy, Ohiodem1, Tara the Antisocial Social Worker, earicicle, DefendOurConstitution, petral, kravitz, MKSinSA, oxfdblue, sfarkash, Tortmaster, jan0080, Railfan, Amber6541, cezariusz, commonmass, Broke And Unemployed, Captain Marty, kjoftherock, Crabby Abbey, angelajean, ko62, Lost and Found, freeport beach PA, plankbob, NM Ray, Eddie L, cordgrass, dlemex, rja, Otteray Scribe, Floande, Oh Mary Oh, Actbriniel, slice, MidwestTreeHugger, Quite Contrary, Liberal Capitalist, Bob Duck, bgblcklab1, slowbutsure, OregonMon, armd, mrsgoo, Cinnamon Rollover, badscience, IllanoyGal, BarackStarObama, muddy boots, SueM1121, nogo postal, bluedust, bakeneko, Vatexia, Hayate Yagami, stlsophos, leftykook, DRo, Mathazar, boredwitnuts, AnnetteK, nominalize, Parlous Daze, anodnhajo, cwsmoke, IndieGuy, nellgwen, winglion, a2nite, Deep Texan, tkirkland, 2thanks, Trotskyrepublican, FreeSpeaker, congenitalefty, Horace Boothroyd III, Syoho, BusyinCA, MartyM, pittie70, Buckeye54, dfwlibrarian, notdarkyet, Noddy, wasatch, Anonyman, quiet is the new loud, efrenzy, tn mountain girl, Canis Aureus, Jonathan Hoag, RerumCognoscereCausas, broths, Yo Bubba, parsonsbeach, Jeff Murdoch, helpImdrowning, tresgray, InfiniteThoughts, peterfallow, Demeter Rising, Fairlithe

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site