Skip to main content

The term anti-democracy may seem automatically hyperbolic, but if you believe knowing things like the political party of the major contenders in a race and the correct day (or month, for that matter) of the election are some of the keys to a functioning democracy, you may find yourself surprisingly open to the idea that some of the campaign tactics I witnessed in my first political campaign as an organizer were not just anti-Democratic, but anti-democracy.

Near the end of the primary election campaign, I held in my hands a mailer that went out to thousands of Democrats that said "Democrats for (the Republican candidate)" in huge letters, while hidden off in a corner in tiny font was written "Paid for by HRCC" (Pennsylvania's House Republican Campaign Committee, but of course, only the acronym was given). The word "Republican" was nowhere to be seen on the mailer.

A robocall was sent out to thousands of Democrats, asking them to write-in the name of the Republican incumbent when they went to vote, but conveniently failing to mention that person is a Republican. A similar Democratic write-in robocall by the Republican candidate gave an unknowable number of Democrats the incorrect election date, even after the Republican claimed it was a mistake that had been stopped.

I had my first political campaign experience in the midterm elections of 2010 canvassing for longtime incumbent Democratic U.S. Congressman Paul Kanjorski. In 2011 I ran for local office, but I relied on a great and wise person named Brian Victory (who I took to referring to as my Obi-Wan Kenobi) for any and all advice on how to go about executing that small campaign (also some social media help from the dynamic Nabil Cristillo).

This year, I found myself unofficially the head volunteer for a campaign for Pennsylvania State Representative in the 176th District, specifically for Democratic candidate Maureen Madden. Since I was around so much, I also became one of the organizers. I knocked on doors with Maureen to get the necessary signatures of registered Democrats to get on the ballot, wrote phone banking scripts (at times we joined forces with the campaign of progressive Democrat Matt Cartwright to beat notorious "Blue Dog" U.S. Congressman Tim Holden) and helped edit a robocall script. I helped Anne Tiracchia, the chair of the Monroe County Democratic Committee, schedule Democratic volunteers to be at the polls to counteract the Republican write-in campaign.

This mailer went out with only about a week until the election. As you can see, I wasn't exaggerating when I said it has "Democrats for (the Republican)" in huge letters, it doesn't say the word "Republican" anywhere on it, and even "Paid for by HRCC" is in tiny letters off in a corner. I think a Democrat who wasn't well-informed and received this mailer could have easily fallen under the misconception that Mario Scavello is a Democrat. It's very important to note here that the district in question has a solid majority of Democratic registered voters, but the Republican (who, incidentally, supported the PA version of ALEC's voter ID bill that has since passed into law, as previously mentioned) has stayed in office because he usually has no one running against him.

On Sunday, April 22nd, a day we were only phone banking because the election was just a couple days away, I walked into our campaign headquarters to hear that Mario Scavello had sent out a robocall to Democrats asking them to write-in his name on the Democratic primary ballot for State Representative. Naturally, the robocall, recorded by Mario himself, failed to mention that he's a Republican. But that wasn't all. This robocall - that I must reemphasize was sent only to Democrats - said that the primary election was May 18th, when it was really on April 24th. We knew it was an old robocall because it said he'd been in office 8 years when it's been 10 now, and May 18th was the date of the primary in the last election cycle.

Anne Tiracchia was going back-and-forth with a local newspaper about it, and we were told that Mario said it was a mistake and he had stopped it. But how exactly does one accidentally put out an old robocall instead of recording a new one? I have a hard time wrapping my brain around that. That just doesn't seem like "mistake" territory to me. Now, you may be thinking, of course, from your perspective opposing him, you wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt that you normally would others. But I phone banked for hours that day, and I can tell you there were many Democrats who were confused about when the election was because of Mario's robocall, and one gentleman told me he had received the robocall with the false election date just 10 minutes prior to my calling him, well over an hour after we'd gotten word that Mario said he'd stopped the robocall. So, either Mario lied that he'd stopped it when he hadn't yet, or he lied that he'd stopped it while letting it continue on awhile longer, giving more and more Democrats a false election date by the minute.

Then there were those who I (only half-) jokingly refer to as Mario's goons. Mario has these big poster boards with a mock-up of what the ballot looks like inside the voting booth with step-by-step instructions written on them telling Democrats to write-in his name on their ballot. Then there's another poster board with his picture and "Democrats for Mario Scavello" in huge letters to go next to it, the post cards that also have write-in instructions, and the miniature write-in pencils with his name on them. None of these materials mention that Mario is actually a Republican - and neither do the goons. These two poster boards are up outside every polling place in the district with someone handing out the post cards and pencils.

But perhaps more importantly than the materials are Mario's goons - highly aggressive volunteers who wait for voters to approach a polling place and, depending on how much of a goon the goon in question is, literally force the pencil and post card into a voter's hand, following them up to the door of the polling place insisting they vote for Mario. I got pretty lucky with Mario's goons at the polling places where I was all day, but I heard bad stories from a number of people I know from the Monroe County Democratic Committee who were at others. Anne and Maureen both spoke with one of our volunteers who was at a polling place with Mario himself who said she felt he was intimidating her.

When I say I got lucky, I mean I was mostly with more friendly volunteers of Mario's, but that wasn't true for the whole day. At the very beginning of the day, at a church in East Stroudsburg, Mario's goon was handing out the post cards and pencils and told a Democratic voter to write-in his name because he votes with Democrats in the PA House. That's a lie, and I told the voter that wasn't true and I could tell them details if they wanted to hear them. They smiled at me and handed me the post card that had just been handed to them. After they went inside, I asked Mario's goon if she really believed that Mario votes with Democrats because he's usually a party-line voter and has voted for radical right-wing policies. She said she didn't believe me, so I told her about how Mario was an original cosponsor of an ultrasound mandate bill that would, in some cases, require a transvaginal ultrasound (recall Governor Corbett's advice to women to just close their eyes). All she said in response was he must have had a reason for it.

I didn't think anything of it, but several hours later a guy who said he wasn't a voter went in the church for about 15 minutes, came out, and told me he was the constable and that they'd gotten multiple complaints about me accosting voters and forcing abortion discussions. I told him what had happened with Mario's goon earlier in the day, then a voter came by so I gave them my pitch for Maureen Madden, and the constable said what I was doing looked fine and that they hadn't had any complaints inside all day, so there was no problem. Evidently, some of Mario's goons called the Monroe County voter registration office and pretended to be voters with very exaggerated stories.

Perhaps individually the mailer trying to blur the political party of the candidate, or the robocall to one political party with an election date that's a lie, or the thuggish campaign tactics at the polls aren't anti-democracy; I think reasonable people can disagree and there's no question it's a weighty charge. In aggregate, I can't help but feel that our opponents attempted to manipulate the electoral process itself rather than engage in a legitimate, honorable campaign.

Maybe I should have been more cynical about politics generally and expected all this; not that I was totally stunned by it, but I also couldn't say I expected it. This was the first time I experienced political dirty tricks first-hand. It was reminiscent of a particular scene in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Weeks later, it still does not feel like hyperbole to say they engaged in tactics that could be described as anti-democracy in nature.

The good news is the Republican write-in campaign was a dismal failure. On to November.

Originally posted to ProgressivePatriotPA on Fri May 11, 2012 at 09:53 AM PDT.

Also republished by Youth Kos 2.0 and DKos Pennsylvania.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (13+ / 0-)

    "Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong." - Fighting Bob La Follette

    by ProgressivePatriotPA on Fri May 11, 2012 at 09:53:52 AM PDT

  •  i just read in the Nation (4+ / 0-)

    that the tea party is working overtime to suppress votes:

    Numerous reports have documented how state GOP chapters, local Tea Party groups and organizations like Americans for Prosperity are mobilizing across the country—holding training sessions and posting instructional videos on their websites about how to challenge suspicious voters. But the right's concern about widespread voter fraud has virtually no basis in empirical reality; a 2007 study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that "an American is more likely to get struck by lightning than impersonate another voter at the polls."

    its going to be ugly. thanks for your diary!!!
  •  thanks (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    for sharing your experience.  It's important that all of us be involved in the process, and that we not be surprised at what might happen, but rather be prepared for it.  So, thanks again, for your revelations.

    •  The funny thing is (0+ / 0-)

      it had actually crossed my mind before posting this that for veteran activists on DailyKos these things might seem like such small potatoes it's not worth writing about. I guess it's good I posted it anyway. Thanks for the kind words and the rec. :)

      "Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong." - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Fri May 11, 2012 at 11:58:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  In November, they'll try to keep us from voting. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    That's what their new photo ID law is designed for.

    Republicans will stop at NOTHING to gain and hold power.

    •  Absolutely right. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Like I talk about in a past diary that's linked in this one, when Mario was answering questions from the Monroe County League of Women Voters about the voter ID bill he supports and they asked since that would address a type of voter fraud that virtually never happens but there actually are other, more prevalent types of voter fraud that might make efforts to limit if there was anything they were working on there, he had absolutely nothing to say. They don't care about the integrity of the voting process, they utterly fail the most basic Socratic test.

      "Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong." - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Fri May 11, 2012 at 12:06:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  i'm curious. (0+ / 0-)

    why do you have a question mark (in parentheses) after "anti-democracy tactics" -- ?

    like you're not sure whether they are, or not.

    here's a hint: yes, most definitely, they are.

    that's the whole idea.

    get it?

    •  I talk about that in the beginning and at the end. (0+ / 0-)

      Essentially, the reason is because I'd rather try to facilitate a conversation than engage in ad hominem attacks.

      I think we all should have a high bar for what qualifies as "anti-democracy," and I'd expect people to be skeptical about such a claim. I wouldn't mind having a discussion about does or does not constitute anti-democracy tactics, I'm sure there are widely varying views on the subject.

      I tried to make it clear what my personal opinion is, while still leaving it open to discussion. So that's why the question mark is there.

      Thanks for the question.

      "Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong." - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Fri May 11, 2012 at 12:15:06 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  ad hominem? (0+ / 0-)

        i think you're mixing your metaphors a bit too much.

        unless you're one who believes an inanimate object (like politics or corporations) has human qualities.

        if you mean, calling out the actions of others for what they are, that's really splitting rhetorical hairs, isn't it?

        •  please accept my apology for my previous comments. (0+ / 0-)

          i'd like to be able to say i was having a bad hair/haircut day, but i actuallly got a pretty good one, so all i can say is i was in violation of markos' "don't go into someone's diary & be a dick" rule & i was wrong.

          i think my troll-dar was set too high & assumed you might be one, too, so, weak as it is, that's my excuse.

          your diary was pretty good & the only thing it had going for it that was bad, was it being overshadowed by the romnesia stories.  i look forward to reading more of them, & i'll try not to be so severe in the future.

          good luck w/your studies & activism.

          i pm'd you, just in case you don't get to read this, to be sure you get the apology.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site