Skip to main content

Robert Reich and Paul Krugman have it right.  This is the most terrible depression!  Through conversation with charliehiphop it has become apparent that the reality of our economic malaise is much greater than I had previously thought.

And the only thing that you need to look at to determine just how bad it still really is is to look at the Labor Force Participation Rate.

Here is the historic graph

This graph represents the pecentage of the u.s. population that is actively participating in the u.s. workforce.  The ability of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to slough off large numbers of citizens from the "active" rolls (350 thousand last month!) allows it to leave unemployment rates artificially low.  In the early 1990's we didn't do this and it was fairly clear that unemployment would be much higher today if we were measuring it the same way that we did.

Notice how each time the participation rate went down we were in a recession?  The double dip one of 1990-1992 and the first bush recession of 2000-2004.

now look at the slope of the decline of the most recent recession since 2007.  See how much greater it is. and how consistent it is?  From March of 2008 to present we are seeing the most rapid and consistent decline in labor force participation than we have seen in modern times.

Robert Reich and Krugman are correct, the Great Recession is much much worse than is being let on.  The obvious implications for future housing values and the potential for European economic Contagion shows that we are in for a continued significant economic downturn.

for historical perspective here is the county-level unemployment increase month by month during the second bush recession.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site