Skip to main content

see saw with man outweighing woman

Unsurprisingly, and overshadowed by the Wisconsin recall, Senate Republicans blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act on Tuesday. There was, of course, a 52 to 47 majority in favor of fair pay on a party line vote, but in our broken Senate, as we know, a majority is not enough to even get to a final up or down vote. Neither is broad-based public support:

"This is a common-sense measure with broad public support. Nine out of 10 Americans – including 81 percent of men and 77 percent of Republicans – support this legislation," [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid said. "But once again, the only Republicans who are left opposing a common-sense measure to improve our economy and help middle-class families are the ones here in Washington."
"It is incredibly disappointing that in this make-or-break moment for the middle class, Senate Republicans put partisan politics ahead of American women and their families," President Obama said in a statement. "My Administration will continue to fight for a woman’s right for equal pay for equal work, as we rebuild our economy so that hard work pays off, responsibility is rewarded, and every American gets a fair shot to succeed."

Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV), who voted to block the bill, is introducing another bill that would address one small part of what the Paycheck Fairness Act does, allowing women to talk to their coworkers about salaries—often the only way to find out if you're being discriminated against—but omitting government actions that would help uncover discrimination or actively help women negotiate for better salaries. Heller faces a close race against Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley and is working hard to prove that he's a friend to women, so this is the baseline: a Republican trying to look like he's not part of the war on women will vote against a pay equity bill that has majority support in the Senate ... then water it down and try to claim credit.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  They hate Obama more than they care (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    possum

    about the country. They could give less than a shit about women.  Go out and have some babies, dammit!

  •  Remember the old common law slogan (0+ / 0-)

    A right without a remedy is no right at all.

    That is, you ain't got a right if you cannot enforce that right when the poo comes down.
     This and what I recall was a recent  MI statute barring various women's discrimination claims from state court, and requiring them to go the the expense of having and paying for a federal claim and case is a sample of that. What was done here is precisely the same.

    Don't say you are making war on women, but rather fighting pesty litigation, even though the only way women's rights have moved forward since 1920 is through litigation.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site