Skip to main content

What is Treason? Is Congress Guilty?

Is Congress guilty of treason? Treason is generally considered the act of betraying one's country and the crime is considered to be not only reprehensible, but a capital crime. Depending upon the nature and severity of the treasonous act, the penalty can be death. The betrayal of one's country can take many forms; it can go well beyond selling state secrets or working to advocate for or plotting the violent overthrow of the government. It is possible to make a case that the deliberate tanking of a country's economy solely for political gain is treason, and on that basis I suggest that the Republican members of our Congress are guilty of treason.

It is now widely known that on the very eve of the Presidential inauguration in January of 2009, fifteen or so key Republican legislators, flanked by their wordsmith, Frank Luntz, and a formerly disgraced Republican Speaker of the House (Newt Gingrich), plotted to destroy a Presidency and to tank the economy. They agreed that they would make President Obama a one-term President by any means necessary, and if that meant destroying an already drowning economy, well- Damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead!

To their credit, both John Boehner and Mitch McConnell were absent (only because they supposedly hate Frank Luntz), but were both brought up to speed and swore their allegiance, not to the flag, but to the unholy alliance. These legislators would refuse to cooperate in any way, shape or form with the new President. They premeditated. They made the conscious decision to stand united and obstruct any effort by this new President to salvage what was left of the economy. In their minds, the result would be well worth the collateral damage they would inflict on the citizens and the country that they had sworn to protect. If these "statesmen" stood together, united, the country would NOT recover from the worst financial crisis the country had seen since the Great Depression and the people they screwed in the process would blame the President and he would in turn become a one-term President. Blame the Congress? Never! They were simply being partisans, not traitors...

Even when they went so far as to oppose anything and everything that they themselves had always supported? Well, when the new President decided to give some traditional Republican ideas a shot, the Republicans immediately said no. Not on your life, Mr. Obama! We think your ideas smack of socialism and besides that, we don't think you are an American! These Congressional Republicans would not lift one finger to help this President succeed, because if he succeeded, the suffering of the American people might end sooner rather than later and that could defeat the Master Plan.

No one would call them out and they had hoped that no one would find out about that winter's night meeting that began as a sour grapes session, but quickly turned into a daring game of chicken, during which they plotted the death of a Presidency and the continued economic ruin of millions of Americans.

Treason By Any Other Name Is Still Treason

Is there anything that this President could have suggested that would have garnered any support from those on the Republican side of the aisle? I think not. Supporting this President would have been anathema. Many names and labels have been given to the Republican dogma currently being preached in Congress. Many who are so concerned with political correctness have skated around the behavior, fearful maybe, of being considered unfair. Democrats for the most part have called it obstructionism, while still others have labeled it Big "C" conservatism or extreme partisanship. Few have dared to call it what it really is, but I contend that treason by any other name is still treason.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Treason is "giving aid and comfort to the enemy". (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    enhydra lutris, Jillian Barclay

    By definition, the right is the enemy of this country. Therefore there is no way that they can commit actual treason. (And I don't see any way that anyone can be helped by trivializing the term this way.)

    There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

    by oldpotsmuggler on Wed Jun 13, 2012 at 07:52:13 PM PDT

    •  Big T little t, what begins with T? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Jillian Barclay
      Article 3 Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.
      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
      treason    noun
      1.  the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
      2.  a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
      3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
      So it's true, they were not unConstitutional, but they sure were unconscionable. And it seems to me that to think globally is difficult to balance with acting locally, but it could be done, and done well, by people acting on their consciences, loving their neighbors, etc. How do these people face their gods at church, temple and/or synagog?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site