Skip to main content

Caught unawares, the Republican reaction to today's immigration policy announcement has been "it is illegal and unconstitutional because stuff".  

Rep. Steve King, R-IA:

"This is no longer a debate about immigration policy. The debate is now about the Constitution and the Rule of Law," the Iowa congressman said in a statement. "I am preparing to bring suit against the President and ask for a court to enjoin him from implementing his unconstitutional and unlawful policy."
John Yoo, R-Torture:
President Obama’s claim that he can refuse to deport 800,000 aliens here in the country illegally illustrates the unprecedented stretching of the Constitution and the rule of law. He is laying claim to presidential power that goes even beyond that claimed by the Bush administration, in which I served.
Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Arizona
"Just when the American public is starting to think President Obama cannot go any further with his unconstitutional executive overreach--he reaches a new low. Obama has turned the Presidency into a monarchy. Only Congress is constitutionally authorized to change federal immigration law. The president's directive is unconstitutional. Obama, his Cabinet, and his czars have shown from day one they believe they are above the law. They are not. The president cannot decree what laws will be enforced and what will be ignored."
I could do more, but why?

But then a voice of sanity breaks through. And it comes from a Republican politician from Utah! Join me below orange hole in the border fence to read about it.

The man in question is Mark Shurtleff, Utah's Republican, Conservative, romney-suppoting Attorney General.  As reported by Greg Sargent:

“This is clearly within the president’s power,” Shurtleff said. “I was pleased when the president announced it.”

...

“Law enforcement makes decisions based on the resources available to them — until Congress acts, we’ll be left with too many people to deport,” Shurtleff said. “The administration is saying, `Here’s a group we could be spending our resources going after, but why? They’re Americans, they see themselves as Americans, they love this country.""

Shurtleff added that the decision, by allowing children brought here illegally to go to school and work, could encourage them to stay out of gangs — which he called a “conservative” goal.

Good on you, Mark Shurtleff.

Last year the ICE deported around 400,000 immigrants, for a cost of $5 Billion.  So long as its budget remains the same, the number of deportations will remain the same.

So what do the Republicans want?

Will they raise taxes or increase the deficit to increase ICE's budget? No, and no.

So, do they want ICE to deport the first random 400,000 undocumented immigrants it bumps into?

Or do they want ICE to deport undocumented immigrants who are involved in non-immigration-related criminal activity?

Shurtleff gets it: law enforcement makes decisions based on the resources available to it.  And deporting kids who grew up here and are fully integrated into our society makes no sense whatsoever.

His words should be quoted to every hyperventilating wing-nut in America.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site