Skip to main content

I got rather depressed last night as I watched the PBS weekly show that I used to watch when I was young -- "Washington Week in Review," or something like that. It seemed from watching that at least one of the pundits seemed so obscessed with pointing out President Obama's campaign weaknesses that she forgot to mention the proven weaknesses of his opponent.
The pundit cited unnamed Democrats and claimed that they felt a deepening gloom about the president's campaign chances. I would have like to know WHO were the Democrats the pundit spoke with in drawing her conclusion.
The pundit (and the other panelists in the clip I saw), while claiming that the Obama campaign was hurt by recent economic news and what she called "off-message" gaffes by surrogates, failed to mention the continued problems of Mitt Romney when it comes to his mendacity and his extremist positions.
Her failure to mention Romney weakesses clearly illustrated one thing to me-- the mainstream media is far more interesting in creating a so-called "horse race" that really isn't. These pundits aren't interested in asking the probing questions needed about positions both the President and Romney have taken but are trying (I think falsely) to portray a "doom and gloom" feeling among Democrats.
More below.

I'm not saying that President Obama's re-election is assured (I do think it's going to be a close fight, and we're going to need everything we can find to win), but I find it rather curious that this pundit (whose name I don't recall) failed to mention the even more significant lies of Romney.
Is this pundit (and others) really THAT afraid of what would happen if they really delved into Romney's ideas and record? Is this pundit (and others) so anxious to offend their sources within the Romney campaign that they're not willing to (among other things) call Romney's lies what they really are-- lies?
And is this pundit (and others) so afraid of having their sources within the Romney campaign dry up if they said one true word about what Romney says and the impact of the proposals he has advocated (example: the Ryan bill)?
O.K., the election's result could depend largely on the state of the economy. Having said that, I feel those who view PBS' "Washington Week" and similar shows deserve far better than hearing from pundits who seem more interested in not offending Romney handlers and creating a "horse race" instead of providing thoughtful analysis of both candidate's records and stands on issues.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site