Skip to main content

Today in Talkingpoints memo there is a post by Sahil Kapus, reporting that Scalia is releasing a book prior to the Supreme Court ruling on health care.  Reportedly in this book Scalia reverses himself on supporting a precedent that he agreed with as late as 2005.  This precedent underlies many of the arguments supporting the health care law.  The full post is available here.  The ethical issues this raises are astounding.

Clearly, Scalia changing his opinion on a precedent, while leaving the door opinion to change it back, leaves the distinct impression that this is a political decision.  Scalia again, despite protestations otherwise, is a political judge.  However, what I find the most egregious, is not that Scalia is clearly building an argument in support of money interests, but that he that he is personally enriching himself by doing so.  By releasing the book at this time, he is not only creating sales by providing information that is not yet available in the court ruling, he is giving all of the monied people and corporations in this country the opportunity to pay him for this decision by buying his book.

Scalia both now and in the past has demonstrated that he has no need appear unbiased.  After all isn't Scalia the judge who went hunting with Dick Cheney when cases in which Cheney was closely involved were on his docket.  Maybe its time that the Supreme Court Justices at least gave the appearance of having ethical principals?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site