Skip to main content

Andy Sipowicz, NYPD Blue
In April 2009, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the Federal Communications Commission was within its legal authority to craft a policy punishing broadcasters for "fleeting expletives"—those accidental, unscripted moments which make live programming so much fun, like when Nicole Richie said at the 2003 Billboard Awards: “Why do they even call it ‘The Simple Life?’ Have you ever tried to get cow shit out of a Prada purse? It’s not so f---ing simple," or when the Phillies' Chase Utley spoke at the end of the 2008 World Series victory celebration.

The Court that day ruled that the FCC could have such a policy, but passed on whether the particular policy enacted (as well as the FCC's overall indecency policy) was constitutional, remanding that issue for further consideration. In July 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit deemed the policy unconstitutionally vague, citing among other things the FCC's inconsistent standards between "bullshit" (deemed indecent) and "dickhead" (decent), which left broadcasters without sufficient notice as to what they could do.

Thursday morning, a unanimous Supreme Court struck down the FCC policy as unconstitutionally vague for not providing the networks with fair notice as to what was forbidden. (Justice Sotomayor recused, so it's 8-0.)  

Basically, as Justice Kennedy explains, the FCC can't keep changing its mind about Andy Sipowicz's ass, or any of the other buttocks which appeared on NYPD Blue:

With respect to ABC, the Government with good reason does not argue no sanction was imposed. The fine against ABC and its network affiliates for the seven seconds of nudity was nearly $1.24 million. The Government argues instead that ABC had notice that the scene in NYPD Blue would be considered indecent in light of a 1960 decision where the Commission declared that the “televising of nudes might well raise a serious question of programming contrary to 18 U. S. C. §1464." This argument does not prevail. An isolated and ambiguous statement from a 1960 Commission decision does not suffice for the fair notice required when the Government intends to impose over a $1 million fine for allegedly impermissible speech. The Commission, furthermore, had released decisions before sanctioning ABC that declined to find isolated and brief moments of nudity actionably indecent. See, e.g., ... In re WPBN/ WTOM License Subsidiary, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd. 1838, 1840 (2000) (finding full frontal nudity in Schindler’s List not indecent). This is not to say, of course, that a graphic scene from Schindler’s List involving nude concentration camp prisoners is the same as the shower scene from NYPD Blue. It does show, however, that the Government can point to nothing that would have given ABC affirmative notice that its broadcast would be considered actionably indecent. It is likewise not sufficient for the Commission to assert, as it did in its order, that though “the depiction [of nudity] here is not as lengthy or repeated” as in some cases, the shower scene nonetheless “does contain more shots or lengthier depictions of nudity” than in other broadcasts found not indecent. This broad language fails to demonstrate that ABC had fair notice that its broadcast could be found indecent. In fact, a Commission ruling prior to the airing of the NYPD Blue episode had deemed 30 seconds of nude buttocks “very brief” and not actionably indecent in the context of the broadcast.
What's important today is not just what the Court did—striking down the past fines—but what it didn't do. The Court again leaves for another day the question of whether the FCC's current indecency policy is constitutional, by holding only that the FCC's policy was unclear in the early aughts. Of note, however, Justice Ginsburg today became the second Justice to explicitly call into question whether broadcasters could be regulated at all, given technological advances, joining Justice Thomas' questioning the FCC's authority in the 2009 decision.

SCOTUSblog has briefs and other case materials.

Originally posted to Adam B on Thu Jun 21, 2012 at 09:15 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site