Skip to main content

The Supreme Court has decided on SB1070 and it appears that little by little the most aggressive anti-immigrant legislation created in U.S. history is being dismantled. It was born in a laboratory called Arizona and was carefully nurtured in a bright white petri dish branded with the ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) logo and bought and paid for by the giant private prison industry.

The masterful art of taking the fear of others who don't look like you, who talk different than you, perhaps maintain different customs, coupled with the outright racism of others, the ardent desire to preserve the white race by yet others, and profiting from that fear by cashing it into votes and laws is impressive. The concept is basic, yet Machiavellian and diabolical. You scare the hell out of the voters with fictitious talk of decapitated bodies in the Arizona desert and an alleged invasion of this country using key elected officials like Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona and ex Arizona state senate president Russell Pearce, and you end up with a terrified voter willing to cast their vote over and over for those who they think will protect them from this "invasion." But why would these politicians be so hell bent on using the immigrant as their whipping post? Simple, they love the title and the power that comes from holding an elected position. Senator X, Legislator Y, the Honorable Z, etc. It commands respect and grants you unbelievable power, and we all know what happens when you allow power to swell your head. As Lord Acton put it,  "Power corrupts, and absolute power, corrupts absolutely."

That's exactly what's happened to Arizona's politicians. The whole lot of them! After all, most of those politicians supportive of SB1070 took money from the private prison industry.  

There is big business at play here. What we're looking at is a multi-billion dollar business that is simply not going to go away. These private prisons are here to stay. It falls right in line with the privatization of our education system and our health care system. Perhaps even the social security system at the rate the Republican controlled congress is headed.  

To give you an idea of the impact the private prison industry has had on the political landscape, I've taken a section from an AZ Central article that thoroughly explains it.

Political footprint

The nation’s largest and oldest corrections company, CCA runs more than 60 prisons and immigrant-detention centers across 19 states and the District of Columbia. It has by far the largest political footprint of the dozen or so companies that operate private prisons in the U.S.

CCA has spent about $17.6 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies over the past decade, according to records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan organization that tracks the effect of money on U.S. politics. The agencies include the Department of Homeland Security and its Immigration and Customs Enforcement division, which contract with private operators such as CCA for immigration-detention centers.

Thirty of CCA’s 35 lobbyists on Capitol Hill previously worked for members of Congress or for federal agencies. Two CCA senior executives are former directors of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, including Harley Lappin, whom CCA hired in June as chief corrections officer a week after his retirement from the bureau. CCA is a major bureau contractor. Another CCA vice president, Bart VerHulst, previously worked as chief of staff for then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee.

Since 2000, the company has won $3.84 billion in federal contracts, including just under $546 million for federal contracts in Arizona, according to government records. CCA’s six prisons in Arizona hold inmates from other states, federal prisoners and immigration detainees. Its bid calls for moving out prisoners from Hawaii and California at its existing Red Rock and La Palma prisons in Eloy and moving in Arizona prisoners.

CCA lobbies heavily on the state level, employing 178 lobbyists in 32 states over the past eight years, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics, a nonpartisan group that gathers lobbying and campaign-finance data.

In Arizona, the company has cultivated high-level connections. Former U.S. Sen. Dennis DeConcini sits on CCA’s board of directors. Perhaps the highest profile among CCA’s 22 registered lobbyists in Arizona belongs to Chuck Coughlin, president of HighGround Public Affairs Consultants and a senior political adviser to Gov. Jan Brewer. Besides CCA, HighGround’s 23 lobbying clients include Maricopa County and Salt River Project.

Coughlin served as chairman of Brewer’s transition team when she took office in 2009 and as her campaign manager in 2010. He also has managed election campaigns for Senate President Russell Pearce.

Other heavy hitters with ties to CCA include Paul Senseman, a lobbyist with Policy Development Group, who served until last fall as Brewer’s spokesman and whose wife, Kathryn Senseman, lobbied for that group while he worked for Brewer; and Bradley Regens, who joined CCA in 2007 after nine years as an Arizona legislative staffer, including two years as director of fiscal policy for the state House of Representatives.

Brewer has advocated for privatizing Arizona prisons. But even other privatization supporters say her CCA connections raise red flags.

“I’ve questioned Brewer’s choice of staff in the past for the same reason; she has a lot of contract lobbyists, and I have a problem with that,” said Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City. “At the very least it gives the public the appearance that these companies have too much influence, and you have to wonder what’s going on when they leave Brewer’s office and go right back into lobbying.”

Brewer’s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Since 2003, CCA employees and affiliates have given nearly $2 million in campaign contributions to state-level candidates and ballot issues across the U.S.

In Arizona, CCA associates and its political-action committee have reported giving about $35,000 in political donations over the past decade to Brewer, Pearce, former House Speaker Kirk Adams, House Speaker Andy Tobin and many others. A big chunk of that, $11,520, was given for last year’s election campaigns.

Arizona lobbying firms that represent CCA made about $35,000 in political contributions in the 2010 election cycle. Whatever influence contributions may bring, they are wielded on behalf of many clients.  

Given the recent Supreme Court decision on SB1070, President Obama's executive order regarding the Dreamers, The fact that ICE pulled the 287g certification from 7 law enforcement agencies, including the one previously granted to the Department of Public Safety, and to add insult to injury, ICE made it very clear that they would not pickup anyone suspected of being in the country unlawfully unless they had committed a felony.

It's obvious that the private prison industry is being dealt a serious financial blow. The less undocumented immigrants captured and detained in CCA's prisons, means a smaller invoice that can be tendered to the Feds for incarceration of individuals who the states feel is the Feds responsibility. This is shocking to me given the amount they spend on lobbyist. Does this then come down to a war behind the scenes that hasn't been exposed by the media? The Obama administration has to be aware that they are dealing the private prison industry a big financial hit. The private prison industry has to have voiced their opposition to this administration's recent immigration policy, and it's applications.

The question remains, how will CCA and Geo Group, the two largest private prison industry purveyors explain the dramatic loss in revenue to their investors? Will CCA and Geo Group take advantage of Citizens United and get behind Romney with substantial backing for the Super PACS in the hopes that a President Romney would reverse these executive orders?  

Allow me to float an idea that the general populous should be very concerned about. These private prisons that have traditionally held what many call "illegal aliens", may soon be holding your brother, your sister or your neighbor. We could soon see harsher penalties for crimes committed, longer prison sentences, and, there's a great likelihood that those sentences will be carried out in private prisons. To quote the AZ Central story, "CCA lobbies heavily on the state level, employing 178 lobbyists in 32 states over the past eight years." I ask, what do you think they're going to do with an army of lobbyists when the amount of immigrants they have been incarcerating diminishes? It's obvious that state legislatures will be lobbied for specific laws with harsher penalties creating a new breed of prisoner.

I don't think CCA and Geo Group, really care about the color of your skin, they just care about filling their jail cells for profit.

I imagine there's a lot of disappointed investors, legislators, racists, xenophobes, white supremacists. They all had their personal reason for supporting SB1070, and they all worked in tandem to ensure it's preservation, but in one fell swoop on June 25, 2012 they all took a serious hit from SCOTUS and the Obama administration.  

Carlos E. Galindo is a radio talk show host & political analyst conducting radio shows in both English and Spanish on four radio stations in Arizona. Mr. Galindo is a weekly contributor to KPFK 98.7 FM Los Angeles and W60 AM Radio, Los Angeles, San Diego and has appeared on CNN, Univision and Telemundo as a political analyst. Mr. Galindo is also an Op-Ed columnist on Prensa Hispana and the Tucson Citizen in Arizona.  Carlos Galindo is President and founder of the Immigrant Advocacy Foundation, Inc.

Originally posted to Carlos Galindo's Perspective on Tue Jun 26, 2012 at 08:19 PM PDT.

Also republished by Baja Arizona Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  this is an important diary (7+ / 0-)

    It is not rational for a government to outsource actions like killing and imprisioning human beings. I think that laws requiring that the US gov't., not for-profit groups fulfill those roles, are necessary and urgent.

    WTF is going on in our country, anyways?

    This Rover crossed over.. Willie Nelson, written by Dorothy Fields

    by Karl Rover on Tue Jun 26, 2012 at 08:33:29 PM PDT

    •  Totally agree. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Larsstephens, a gilas girl, thomask

      You can't make this stuff up.

      by David54 on Tue Jun 26, 2012 at 10:00:56 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  An additional question to consider (5+ / 0-)

      is the degree to which prisoners in the private prisons are set to work for pennies a day on contracts for various sorts of services required by various businesses, a revenue stream for the prison operators which produces cheap labor which cannot quit and is not being paid benefits or minimum wage, and which takes jobs away from the unimprisoned population in the state. A form of outsourcing in its own right. As I recall, various sorts of telephone and call center work have been mentioned.

      •  Yep and they get tax dollars to boot (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Tinfoil Hat, thomask

        This is pure slavery updated with a 21st century veneer. It's "privatize profits, socialize costs" at its most cynical. Truly disgusting. They get us to pay them for needless incarcerations, they turn around and milk unrestricted profits from prison labor-turned-slave-labor, politicians get their orgasms from two fronts: campaign cash flow & feeding the xenophobia of their base voters while disenfranchising and dehumanizing so many people just because of what they look like.

        It is sick sick sick!

        "What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them." -- Pres. Obama (1/20/2009)

        by zizi on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 07:08:42 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  To answer your question: (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      thomask, Azazello

      "financialization"  or "profit extraction"

      once every human and social function is reduced to its lowest common profit stream you get what's going on in our country.

      Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

      by a gilas girl on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 06:01:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  It is American cannibalism (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      In the absence of new enemies to fight outside our borders, and the wrapping up of wars under the Obama administration, American greedsters have nowhere to go bilk than to turn inward. Sadly, it's become eat or be eaten for greedy capitalists and their investor class.

      To these people there is no such thing as "America" unless it makes them even more money. So yeah they find nothing wrong with profiting off the flesh of fellow citizens, under trumped up reasons. Citizenship means squat to them. Social Darwinism at it's most obscene level!

      "What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them." -- Pres. Obama (1/20/2009)

      by zizi on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 07:02:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The United States of Prisons (5+ / 0-)

    So few people realize how large and powerful the prison/industrial complex has become in this country, and they're largely the reason has the largest prison population of snyder country in the world - we have about 5% of the world's population, and over 25% of the world's prisoners. The U.S. is essentially a gulag. And don't forget, this is another reason why the 'war on drugs' is kept going - its the main source of prisoners, and therefore the main source of income for prisons.

    Romney 2012 - Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses? If they would rather die, then they had better do so, and decrease the surplus population!

    by Fordmandalay on Tue Jun 26, 2012 at 08:55:05 PM PDT

  •  This caught my eye (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    phonegery, a gilas girl, zizi, thomask
    The question remains, how will CCA and Geo Group, the two largest private prison industry purveyors explain the dramatic loss in revenue to their investors? Will CCA and Geo Group take advantage of Citizens United and get behind Romney with substantial backing for the Super PACS in the hopes that a President Romney would reverse these executive orders?  
    I'm thinking they all go all-in on Mitt Romney, but.

    Why wouldn't a bunch of zealots like Arpaio just try to get their arresting officers to systematically overcharge people they suspect of being undocumented? To get them in the system. Not every cop would do it, but I bet some loyal ideologues with guns and badges would. If it's a sustained fishing expedition in direct contempt of the new Arizona reality, you can catch a lot of people and put them in cages this way over time. Arpaio and his ilk have got to have loyalists and diehards they have enriched and rewarded along the way. Including judges on the state bench and prosecutors in the AG's office. Label people they were always intending to go target with the old intact version of the law as having committed a crime that falls under the new guidelines for calling in ICE.

    It's not as if the Brewers and Flakes and Arpaios are averse to radical overreach.

    I think we need to seriously consider the possibility that the new legal reality is going to be flipped the bird by state-level Movement Conservative pols, and corporate officers of these private prison outfits, because if Mitt Romney gets elected, the consequences will probably be nill.

    But if Obama gets re-elected, they still might take the 'fuck you' rout by trying to sue and legislate out the second Obama term.

    It's not beyond the realm of imagining, especially among the sort of ratfucking Movement Conservative Government office-holders we see all around the country lately, that they might adopt a 'get these people detained, get them warehoused so our patrons get paid now, and we all worry about the political and legal fallout later' approach.

    Antonin Scalia cited odious post-Civil War laws severely restricting the movement of freed slaves in his dissent, as if what he was citing to bolster his racist and backwards legal reasoning was something noble and just. One more Scalia and Alito, and God knows what horror and corruption will be unleashed on all of us. These racist crazies must be able to taste it they are so close to being able to write their own rules.

    I can see a circumstance where a private for-profit prison company signs contracts that basically go along with providing expensive private cell space for an Arpaio-esque flouting of the new new reality, and get paid handsomely while it's being sued out in court, and put guaranteed pay-out language in the contracts that force the state of Arizona, or whatever other state is in question, to pay them even if the whole thing blows up later.

    If Romney gets elected to the White House. No harm no foul for them.

    If Obama gets re-elected, they try and sue and screw and keep the money flowing to the privatizers until they can't anymore.

    I think of the mass privatization of what were traditionally government services industry as a whole as a part of Movement Conservatism. Just another arm of Movement Conservatism's corporate masters.

    I expect the worst of them.

    I am from the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party

    by LeftHandedMan on Tue Jun 26, 2012 at 09:20:32 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site