Skip to main content

Well it sure looks like my pro Immigration colleagues missed the boat again. As soon as I heard Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio allege that ICE (Immigration & Customs Enforcement) was working with him on picking up the undocumented Immigrants he has been detaining, I knew there was more to the story than Arpaio was claiming.

I heard a Latino civil rights attorney on a Spanish language radio show blowing it off as just crazy rhetoric, and he further encouraged listeners to ignore the old man. He said they give him too much credit and that what he was claiming was hogwash. The cooperation between ICE and MCSO that is.

No matter how much Latino "leaders" and "activists" want to use the "just ignore Arpaio tactic", that's certainly not the way to deal with him. It's best to understand the man and his tactics in order to know how to counter them or at the very least to know how to inform the unprotected Immigrant community who has zero information at their disposal and who clearly depend on their "advocates" to keep them informed. Telling the community to ignore the old man certainly is not in any way helpful to the Spanish speaking Immigrant community who utilizes radio programs and Spanish language television to get what little bits of information they can for purposes of survival. Remember Sun Tzu's advice,
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.

I had a pretty good idea how it was Arpaio was able to get ICE out to pick up the undocumented Immigrants even after President Obama had made it clear that ICE would not pick up those identified as undocumented Immigrants unless they had committed a felony.

In order to understand how Arpaio is gaming the system, you have to understand the prosecutorial tool he's using. It's a controversial law that was conjured up in 2005 for purposes of pursuing human traffickers. The law, A.R.S. 13-2319 is meant to target those human traffickers who make it a business to transport America's labor force across the border and across that unforgiving desert to drop houses where they are often held for ransom until a friend or family member coughs up the additional bucks requested.

I don't think any of us have a problem with the prosecution of human traffickers commonly referred to as "coyotes". It's precisely that "coyote" law, A.R.S. 13-2319 that has allowed Sheriff Joe to brag about Immigration and Customs Enforcement's cooperation with his deputies. In the last few days Arpaio has netted over 20 undocumented Immigrants and it appears all have been picked up by ICE.

Let's take a closer look at the method in which the "Coyote" law is being misused by Arpaio and the Maricopa County Attorney's office. In 2006 as the law came to be applied against those being smuggled as co-conspirators, all hell broke loose. Here is an excerpt from an AZbar article:

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office interpreted the new law as creating liability
for such individuals under Arizona’s conspiracy statute, A.R.S. § 13-1003. On June
9, 2006, this interpretation was upheld by the Maricopa County Superior Court after
the defendants arrested under the statute moved for dismissal under various grounds.
The court found jurisdiction and venue were proper in Maricopa County because
overt acts in furtherance of smuggling occurred there. The court found the defendants
“may be prosecuted for conspiracy to smuggling themselves” if it is proved they
provided themselves as “human cargo” and agreed to be transported as illegal aliens.

Despite testimony from one of the bill’s sponsors that A.R.S. § 13-2319 was not
intended to be applied to the aliens who were being smuggled, such exclusionary language was not included in the statute and the legislature is presumed to have
known and intended the conspiracy statute would apply to a violation of A.R.S. § 13-

As mentioned in the article, the intent of the law as written and later confirmed by one of it's authors former state lawmaker Jonathan Paton, was not to pursue those being smuggled, but to punish those doing the smuggling.

The inappropriate use of the law was challenged in a lawsuit by Somos America Coalition and ironically ex senator and political opportunist Kyrsten Sinema was a plaintiff in that lawsuit. Yes the same "Democratic" senator who later created an anti-Immigrant law titled SB1225 in which she hypocritically utilizes A.R.S. 13-2319 as her prosecutorial tool.

So now you know, what I know. Arpaio simply has to get a Spanish speaking investigator or officer to ask these timid undocumented immigrants if they paid a coyote to be transported. By the time they are questioned, their morale is shot, they more than likely have traveled days across a desert that takes it's tolls in lives. Perhaps they witnessed some of their group get left behind and die next to a bush in the desert, they suffered thirst, hunger and their body has been ravaged by the elements. So when asked a basic question, "did you pay a coyote to bring you here?", they're quick to answer, "si señor, le page a un coyote $3,000.00 para cruzarme" Which interprets into, "yes sir, I paid a human smuggler $3,000.00 to transport me. That's all she wrote! Joe Arpaio now has enough to charge them with conspiracy to smuggle themselves which under A.R.S. 13-2319 is a class four felony. Don't take my word for it, take a look at Joe Arpaio's press release outlining the details as I just articulated.

So it's a no brainer, Obama's recent policy change indicates ICE will not pickup undocumented Immigrants from police officers in Arizona unless they are being charged with a felony. Well, given the aforementioned information, it appears ICE will be forced to cooperate with Joe and his MCSO goons, thanks to the misuse of A.R.S. 13-2319, another piece of poorly designed legislation by Arizona's inept Republican lawmakers.

Carlos E. Galindo is a radio talk show host & political analyst conducting radio shows in both English and Spanish on four radio stations in Arizona. Mr. Galindo is a weekly contributor to KPFK 98.7 FM Los Angeles and W60 AM Radio, Los Angeles, San Diego and has appeared on CNN, Univision and Telemundo as a political analyst. Mr. Galindo is also an Op-Ed columnist on Prensa Hispana and the Tucson Citizen in Arizona.  Carlos Galindo is President and founder of the Immigrant Advocacy Foundation, Inc.

Originally posted to Carlos Galindo's Perspective on Thu Jul 05, 2012 at 08:48 PM PDT.

Also republished by RaceGender DiscrimiNATION, Invisible People, and Baja Arizona Kossacks.


Did Arpaio pull another fast one?

50%20 votes
10%4 votes
7%3 votes
32%13 votes

| 40 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This part of the diary..... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the quote...

    I had a pretty good idea how it was Arpaio was able to get ICE out to pick up the undocumented Immigrants even after President Obama had made it clear that ICE would not pick up those identified as undocumented Immigrants unless they had committed a felThony
    This statement is either poorly written or it is a not a very specific rendition of what Obama did....
  •  Arpaio stated a week ago that he'd be using (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    luckylizard, Larsstephens

    "human trafficking" as an excuse to round up undocumented aliens. I wish the DOJ would take him down without further ado.

    "I was a big supporter of waterboarding" - Dick Cheney 2/14/10

    by Bob Love on Thu Jul 05, 2012 at 11:38:24 PM PDT

  •  Using the law to subordinate the people, (0+ / 0-)

    rather than serve justice, is not a happenstance; it's a feature of authoritarian rule.  Authoritarians, regardless of party affiliation, are convinced that people are basically unruly and the law exists to make people behave.  That's the core tenet of the culture of obedience.
    We've all been taught that obedience is a virtue.  But, obedience implies subordination to another person.  So, obedience is the antithesis of liberty and equality. To get around this reality, they've come up with the notion that obedience to the rule of law is somehow different; that by depersonalizing authority -- i.e. making a person subservient to impersonal law -- they negate subservience.  They also pretend that laws are not man-made. Equality actually comes in handy in that it allows for the theory that, if all men are deprived of their rights equally, the deprivation is OK.
    That the logic of their argument is flawed does not matter to people whose thinking is not logical.

    If one starts with the proposition that "all men are created evil and must be made good," then the strategies being employed to subjugate them are entirely consistent. Wild animals have to be caged and trained.
    I prefer the term "preconceived notion" to prejudice because the latter is so often associated with antagonism.  The notion that all men are created evil is not antagonistic; nor is it directed at any particular people.  The people being targeted for capture and exclusion in Arizona are serving as exemplars to the rest of the population that the culture of obedience expects them to behave and, if they don't, they will be expelled. The culture of obedience is abusive. Depriving people of their rights is the default and any mitigation has to be earned, even the right to life -- i.e. to continue living. People can't earn a living, if they're not obedient. Humans exist to be obedient.  That's what the story of the Garden of Eden teaches.  A failure to obey is what got Eve expelled.  That Satan lied and tricked her into believing an untruth is long forgotten. After all, it is disobedience which justifies man's subordination and domination of his own kind. Blaming the victim covers a multitude of sins.  It serves the practically incompetent, who can't produce anything useful to themselves and others, particularly well. What would Arpaio do, if he couldn't order people around? The gift of gab, alone, does not put food in one's mouth.

    Willard's forte = "catch 'n' cage"

    People to Wall Street, "let our money go."

    by hannah on Fri Jul 06, 2012 at 02:55:19 AM PDT

  •  If the sheriff didn't see them being smuggled, (0+ / 0-)

    what reason did they have to stop them and pick them up in the first place? It's still racial profiling if at time they stopped and picked them up, they weren't in the process of being smuggled. This could be among the first lawsuits. What's the purpose of the law, if the person (Arpaio bull Connor) breaking said law, isn't held to the law and punished? Everything shouldn't have to go to the supreme court. Just arrest this racist kluxer.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site