Skip to main content

This post is part II of a series discussing the labour market under capitalism. In this part, I am addressing the issue of persistent unemployment in capitalism and the introduction of workfare in the UK specifically and the fightback against Workfare. Workfare, a welfare to work scheme, which forces welfare recipients to work to earn their benefit, has existed for some time in the US (see: 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act; and for a comparison between state workfare programmes see:

Originally introduced in the UK by Labour in 1998 and insultingly called the New Deal", it enabled penalties for those that refused “reasonable work” and established courses and volunteer work to get those on benefits into work and provided tax credits for working families to keep them working.

However, the attempt by the current government in the UK to extend it has led to both legal action and resistance on the part of those being forced to labour. The 2010 “Work for your Benefits Pilot Scheme”  and the extension of the Mandatory Work Activity scheme (2011 and 2012) which is supposedly for those that are not on board with the shift from welfare to work strategy of the government) in numbers of “customers” forced to labour without pay and  in light of severe criticism in terms of the introduction of forced labour as well as the known ineffectiveness of these schemes is more than questionable. However, it is certainly consistent with the policies and beliefs of the current government.

I. The Programme

For those interested further in the specifics of the current government’s “work programme,” information can be found both at the Department of Works and Pensions website; a slightly more critical (slightly) perspective can be found on the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion’s web-page.

Essentially, there is the mandatory work activity (MWA); which says that if you are referred there you must do 4 weeks of 30 hours unpaid labour at government offices, charities and private companies (

“[…] the Mandatory Work Activity Scheme” means a scheme within section 17A (schemes for assisting persons to obtain employment: “work for your benefit” schemes etc.) of the Act known by that name and provided pursuant to arrangements made by the Secretary of State that is designed to provide work or work-related activity for up to 30 hours per week over a period of four consecutive weeks with a view to assisting claimants to improve their prospects of obtaining employment (”
Then there is the "Voluntary Work Experience Scheme" for 16-24 years olds where placement lasts for 2-8 weeks. In both cases, companies (public and private) and charities are paid a subsidy based on how many month-long placements that they organise. In all cases, people work without pay to keep their benefits.

II. A Few Hiccups, huh?

Several things have focussed critical eyes on the government’s workfare programme besides complaints from the trade union movement:

  • The first relates to the case of Cait Reilly a young graduate who was already in a voluntary programme consistent with her skills that was forced to go work for Tesco to stack shelves for free under threat of losing her benefits (; if you are in a masochistic mood, here is The Sun’s response to the fact that she was awarded a judicial review complete with defense of workfare: Her case and that of several others resulted in a judicial review in High Court that was heard last week (the substance of the case will be discussed Part III of this series).
  • Then there is the excellent work by The Guardian which has covered not only the question of workfare, but also the attack on the disabled; this of course has not extended to an apology for telling people to vote for the Lib Dems at the previous election, but at least they are addressing the attack on the poor and disabled.
  • Then there was the A4E scandal (Action for Employment), where some members of the company that has gotten a significant amount of government money for its welfare to work programme were accused of fraud, causing its head to step down; this ultimately resulted in its contract to deliver workfare being terminated; this is serious as that is its sole purpose (;;
  • On June 3rd of this year during The Jubilee celebrations, The Guardian broke an incredible scandal; we can call it the "Jubilee Stewards Scandal" in which unemployed people on benefits were bussed in from Bristol, Bath and Plymouth to London to serve as stewards for the Jubilee celebrations. Some seemed to have been told that they were going to be paid and they were not. The company that recruited them insisted that the outfits and shoes they were given cost them money and that there was no promise of pay. Additionally, the buses that brought them left London (and them) for some reason that has not been answered satisfactorily and these people were essentially stranded, forced to sleep under London Bridge the night before the Jubilee pageant, with no access to toilets and forced to change in public into the uniforms so kindly provided by the company (here is the follow-up piece:

Needless to say, all this has caused people to cast a rather baleful eye on the government’s workfare programme and has made many rather uncomfortable indeed. The fact that no one in the company (Close Protection UK) has been arrested is impressive; at the least, they should lose all access to those on workfare and any subsidies that they have earned for “getting them to work.” Of the 80 people used as Jubilee stewards, 50 were classed as "apprentices", 30 were treated as “customers” of the workfare programme. This means that the former earned £2.80/hour or not (the minimum wage in the UK is £6.08/hr for those over 21; £4.98 for those 18-20; £3.68 for 16-17 year old school leavers and £2.60 for apprentices under 19 or in their first year of apprenticeship; while the latter got no pay for this wonderful work experience.

III.  The Fightback

The fight-back is happening on many levels from legal suits to demonstrations, protests, name and shame campaigns, and telephone and email campaigns.  It has caused the government to have to defend its policy in parliament, in the media, and in court.
On June 26th and 27th 2012, two parts of the UK government’s workfare schemes, the sector-based work academies and the community action programme were challenged in High Court. The following is an excerpt from the press release of Public Interest Lawyers that were challenging the law in court on behalf of Cait Reilly ( and other individuals:

“Our clients argue that what the Government is doing is unlawful because:
•    The Regulations fail to provide any description of the schemes to which people like our client can be subjected. This is contrary to statute;
•    The Government has failed to publish any policies setting out the limits of the schemes; and  
•    The schemes are contrary to the prohibition on forced labour under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Government’s mismanagement of these flagship reforms has resulted in a complete shambles where nobody understands the plethora of schemes that have been created and where the only ones benefiting are the companies getting free labour. Nothing has been done to improve the employment prospects of those like my clients (”
Public Interest Lawyers, the lawyers acting for Cait Reilly and other individuals challenging the law have addressed a number of distortions (cough) that the government has been advocating in defence of their workfare scheme. I suggest that you read the link as the Lawyers clarify not only the distortions of the government and press, but counter them with the truth.  

A week of actions ranging from peaceful demonstrations throughout the UK to phone calls, emails and tweeting has been called by Boycott Workfare: “Protests against workfare will take place on 7-14 July across the UK in a week of action called by the Boycott Workfare network to escalate the campaign against forced unpaid work. Twenty one towns and cities are already taking part, with more locations expected to be announced throughout the week ( and For those that want to participate in the facebook action of phone calls, emails and tweets, here is the link to the action on facebook against companies using workfare ( which includes a sample letter, phone numbers and email addresses. In a new twist, Holland and Barrett, which were to be the focus of the email campaign run by Boycott Welfare and the Solidarity Federation this week have pulled out of the workfare scheme (, but I expect that a new company will be chosen to be targeted so, check the second facebook link if you want to participate (

“The week of action will take place in the wake of several serious challenges to the government’s workfare schemes. Leaked figures suggest that workfare company A4E is failing to meet the minimum requirements for its Work Programme contract, with only 3.5% of “clients” finding longterm work (at a cost of roughly £11,250 per person).  Peer research has shown that Mandatory Work Activity has no impact on people finding work.  The outcome of a Judicial Review which argued that the schemes are unlawful and amount to forced labour is expected soon.

The peaceful protests will step up the pressure on those still involved in workfare. [6] A variety of creative actions are expected to take place including a chain gang march, guided tours of workfare providers, workfare “sleuthing”, colourful pickets and importantly letting unemployed people know their rights. A counter conference will take place in Birmingham during the industry’s Welfare to Work convention (”

Here is a list of companies (both public and private) and charities that use workfare (;  Some of these companies are known outside the UK, specifically Pizza Hut and McDonalds; the first link has phone numbers and emails if you feel inclined to complain. The publication of the list is part of a name and shame campaign undertaken by Boycott Welfare and the Solidarity Federation. The second list begins with those that have dropped out of the programme due to pressure, which now includes Holland and Barrett (

Finally, a conference entitled Making Welfare Work is being held on the 10th of July in Birmingham to counter the Welfare to Workk" conference being held by the Centre for Social and Economic Inclusion being held on the 10th-11th of July.

Originally posted to Anti-Capitalist Chat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 10:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Income Inequality Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

    by NY brit expat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 10:00:06 AM PDT

  •  Part I went up yesterday, it was a more (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    opinionated, adrianrf

    analytical discussion of the existence of persistent unemployment in Capitalism, policies used to deal with it and the political and economic inconsistencies arising from the introduction of forced labour:

    "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

    by NY brit expat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 10:16:31 AM PDT

  •  Hope that people decide to participate in the (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    northsylvania, adrianrf

    actions on facebook; or consider boycotting the companies that are employing forced labour in the US. There are a couple of multinational corps there like Pizza Hut and McDonalds.

    "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

    by NY brit expat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 10:51:59 AM PDT

  •  The Toryesque government (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    NY brit expat, adrianrf, Eric Nelson

    is giving their corporate friends access to wildly underpaid labour, many of them desperate people who really need jobs and could use a genuine work program. The taxpayer foots payments to the corporations for their "generosity" and the workers see very little. This is an outrage bordering on criminal (in some cases cited above, it has been proven criminal).
    Please consider contacting Pizza Hut and McDonald's and let them know that even in the US, people are aware of their shady dealings.  

    "There's a crack in everything; that's how the light gets in". Leonard Cohen

    by northsylvania on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 02:28:58 PM PDT

    •  Oh, and.... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      NY brit expat, adrianrf

      I really hate the Coalition. If you think Democrats have a severe lack of spine, you should see the snails and slugs that make up the LibDems. I will, on the whole, make an exception for Vince Cable, but otherwise....

      "There's a crack in everything; that's how the light gets in". Leonard Cohen

      by northsylvania on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 02:31:51 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  the Lib Dems are pathetic; I have honest sympathy (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        adrianrf, northsylvania

        for Charles Kennedy that built this party and who is watching these pathetic people destroy the social welfare state and the NHS just for a tiny pinch and fantasy of power.

        "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

        by NY brit expat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 03:06:48 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks northsylvania, appreciate the support (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      it is criminal; if it passes the High Court, it will certainly fail in Europe upon further appeal; the threat to remove benefits and hence of destitution is the kicker and what makes it forced labour; the threat of destitution and the threat to family of said destitution is the definition of forced labour. These people need a direct gov't job creation programme where they are paid fair wages not the threat of losing their £65/week job seeker allowance benefits. Combine that with the attack on housing benefits and other benefit cuts and we are talking deliberate impoverishment.

      "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

      by NY brit expat on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 03:05:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Exactly. (0+ / 0-)
        These people need a direct gov't job creation programme where they are paid fair wages not the threat of losing their £65/week job seeker allowance benefits.
        Some actual consideration for a national plan on the economy and employment would be handy as well. It would be helpful if jobs were out there for skivers and slackers such myself to apply for. Training to stack shelves is pretty futile when you have four to five people applying for every shelf stacking job.

        "There's a crack in everything; that's how the light gets in". Leonard Cohen

        by northsylvania on Tue Jul 10, 2012 at 06:16:20 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  NY Brit Expat and all: (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I am a long time activist in WA State for low income people.  Workfare is slave labor, there is no doubt about it.  I have done a lot of thinking about what is "work" and what is not "work".  We seem to think that the only "work" is PAID work.  Unpaid labor is "doing nothing ~ unless you happen to slave for free for a company or charity, THEN magically it becomes "work" as long as it is working off that welfare check at far less than the minimum wage.  

    Some definitions of work I took from Webster's dictionary:

    1. productive or operative activity.

    2. physical or mental effort directed towards doing or making something

    3. to exert effort in order to do, make, or perform something
    4. to cause to labour or toil

    A few things I have observed about workfare and "work" in general:

    1. workfare undermines the labor force.  Why hire anybody and pay them ANY wage, much less a livable wage when you can make someone work for free?  Workfare brings down conditions for everyone, not just the slave laborer.

    2. According to labor statistics even with the 75 cents for every man's dollar earned, women lose even more, over $275,000 throughout a paid work lifetime.  Women have to make the agonizing decisions whether or not to work for a wage or perform, the needed 24/7 care for a loved one. This choice is not only made for the care of children, it is also for elders and spouses as well.  

    3.Yet any work for loved ones is considered "doing nothing", when this work IS doing something; raising children to be the ones to care for US when we can no longer do it, they will fight in our wars, pay our Social Security and Medicare as well as care for and run our infrastructure after we can no longer do it.  

    4. Caring for elders and spouses also saves $Billions in costs that would otherwise have to be paid to others for this care.  Creating institutions to replace this free labor would not only cost $Billions more than it does now, it would only subsidize big businesses in order to release lower paid women to make other people richer by saying, "Do you want fries with that?"

    5. Because this work is traditionally women's work, it is, as usual, denigrated into "doing nothing" in order to force even more labor for the benefit of the rich and powerful.  If it is done as paid work traditional women's work is ALWAYS low waged, and if done without pay for loved ones it is NEVER considered a contribution even though it is depended upon by almost everyone and saves $Billions in unpaid labor.    

    Many years ago I was a feminist, but nowadays I guess I am a humanist because as men take on these traditionally woman's tasks, they are no better off than women were doing those tasks.  

    A story I often tell was as a young feminist is when I was waxing eloquently to my mother, a homemaker, about the "right" to women to work for a wage.  I said that instead of doing household labor and being dependent on a man for anything monetary, we should be able to work for the same wage as a man.  

    My mother heard me out and then said, " Cat, if you think any corporation is going to pay you the same wages as a man, you are dead wrong.  If your generation of women insist on working for a wage, they will only bring ALL wages down to a woman's pay.  All this will do is force you and your spouse into BOTH having to do it..."  

    We need to reconsider what is "work" and what that "work" is worth.  Workfare is only an excuse to pile more and more work on everyone with little or no reward.

    Cat in Seattle

    First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they hurt you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

    by mntleo2 on Tue Jul 10, 2012 at 01:17:02 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site