Skip to main content

Is it possible that the Cons are correct about President Obama's economic policies?  Have they really failed to increase jobs?  Wouldn't Mitt's business experience as a "jobs-creator" be better for our economy?

Well let's look at the latest data from the Labor Department:

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Job openings at U.S. workplaces increased to 3.64 million in May from 3.45 million in April, the U.S. Labor Department reported Tuesday. Compared with the prior year, job openings rose 18% -- private openings increased 17% to 3.25 million, and government openings rose to 395,000 from 303,000. There were about 4.3 million jobs open when the recession began in December 2007. With about 12.72 million unemployed people in May, there were about 3.5 potential job seekers for each opening, down from 3.6 in April. In May of 2011, there were about 13.89 million unemployed people - about 4.5 potential seekers per opening. The number of separations, such as quits and layoffs, rose to 4.35 million in May from 4.14 million in April. Meanwhile, the total number of hires increased to 4.36 million from 4.21 million. The level of hires was about 5 million when the recession began.
Now the economy  has definitely slowed down in the second quarter of 2012, but why?  Dean Baker has the answer:
And why did GDP growth slow? Try the end of the stimulus. Government spending shrank at an annual rate of 2.8 in the fourth quarter of 2010, followed by drops of 5.9 percent in the first quarter and 0.9 percent in the second quarter. After being a boost to growth in the second half of 2009 and the first half of 2010, the government sector became a major drag on growth in the first half of 2011.
And why has there been no more federal stimulus spending?  I think even the dumbest Tea Party dolt - think Sarah Palin - could figure that one out.

Would Mitt do a better at increasing jobs?

21%13 votes
3%2 votes
13%8 votes
61%37 votes

| 60 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Another "Failed" Obama Economic Policy (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jfromga, Maverick80229

    If only we had listened to Mitt, this never would have happened:

    Chrysler said Monday it has produced 1.23 million cars and trucks in North America during the first six months of the year, or 23% more than it did during the same period last year.

    If the automaker continues that pace, its production would exceed 2.4 million this year and keep it on track to post an operating profit of $3 billion this year.

    Chrysler has been adding shifts and boosting production at several plants because its sales have been rising more than the industry as a whole. The company also skipped a traditional two-week shutdown at four of its plants in North America and cut the traditional two-week break to one week at two other plants.

    In Italy last week, Chrysler and Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne said Chrysler's 2012 operating profit could exceed $3 billion.

    "The objective of $3 billion is close at hand. We could overshoot it," Marchionne said, according to Reuters.

    Why would anyone in Michigan or Ohio vote for Mitt?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site