Skip to main content

Double, double toil and trouble.
Gen. Michael Hayden appeared before the Senate Homeland Security Committee Wednesday preaching some back-to-basics fear mongering:
I should add that cyber, terrorist and criminal threats today all merge in a witches’ brew of danger.
"A witches' brew of danger?!" Such a ridiculous phrase would be comical if it wasn't uttered from a supposed national security expert at a scary-sounding congressional hearing ("The Future of Homeland Security: Evolving and Emerging Threats"). As hard as it is to take seriously someone who uses the phrase "witches' brew of danger," Gen. Hayden's remarks succeeded in scaring me, though not because of his warnings of new cyber-attacks and homegrown terrorists, a phrase that evokes more thoughts of a potato farm than fears of an attack. What I found scary about Gen. Hayden's remarks were his warnings about the media's criticism of ill-conceived security theater measures:
But look at the reaction even today when the bureau tries to collect information without a criminal predicate, in that area we called “spaces between cases.” And heaven save us from the Associated Press if the New York City Police Department tries to do the same thing.
In one minuscule sense Gen. Hayden is right: the FBI investigating people without criminal predicate evokes some outrage from those of us who have read the Bill of Rights. Gen. Hayden, in case you haven't read it, the Fourth Amendment requires that the FBI have a reason a.k.a. probable cause before rifling through American's private effects. While we're on the subject, General, that "Associated Press" you want saving from is protected by the First Amendment, which, in case you missed it, also protects Americans' freedom to associate with whomever they like without interference from the government.

Equally disconcerting are Gen. Hayden's potential motivations for pointing out America's apparent unpreparedness for the "witches' brew of danger." Gen. Hayden is currently working at the Chertoff consulting group. Yes, the group run by former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who is no stranger to using fear for profit on something like say, the soft porn body scanners. Chertoff - using his position as former Homeland Security Director - told us America needed to install the naked body scanners in every airport for our security while Chertoff Group represented the scanners' manufacturer, no doubt for a hefty fee.

But you might remember Gen. Hayden better from his time as Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), where he oversaw the NSA's domestic spying program, and told congressional staffer and whistleblower Diane Roark that he could count on a victory in the Supreme Court when the obviously unconstitutional domestic spying was challenged:

. . . Roark says, she warned Hayden that no court would uphold the program. Curiously, Hayden responded that he had already been assured by unspecified individuals that he could count on a majority of “the nine votes”—an apparent reference to the Supreme Court. According to Roark’s notes, Hayden told her that such a vote might even be 7–2 in his favor.
Or maybe you have a more recent memory of Gen. Hayden drawing "boxes" of operating outside the law at the First Amendment Center in 2010. (If you missed it, it's available here during the Q & A section. Note the question from NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake).

Regardless of how you remember Gen. Hayden, Congress would be wise to listen to less self-interested, fear-mongering testimony about our national security. (Though I don't expect much from the Senate Homeland Security Committee, considering its Chairman, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), jumps at any chance to politically capitalize on hysteria in Washington. (Examples here and here.))

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (12+ / 0-)

    My book, TRAITOR: THE WHISTLEBLOWER & THE "AMERICAN TALIBAN," is Amazon's #1 Best Seller in Human Rights Books for February 2012.

    by Jesselyn Radack on Fri Jul 13, 2012 at 06:04:13 AM PDT

  •  Ahh... Hayden and his grasp of the 4th Amendment.. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sandino, aliasalias, rhutcheson

    Still Shakey after all these years.....

    "In a battle all you need to make you fight is a little hot blood and the knowledge that it's more dangerous to lose than to win". - GBW

    by 8ackgr0und N015e on Fri Jul 13, 2012 at 07:27:57 AM PDT

  •  Ugh. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rhutcheson

    We don't need more fear mongering that just serves the government's unfair treatment of whistleblowers. Thanks for staying on top of this.

  •  why do the pants-wetters end up with such (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rhutcheson

    prominent positions in gov't?
    While wetting their pants they want us to piss on the Constitution.  No thanks, asshole.

  •  This same witch's caldron... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aliasalias, rhutcheson

    Was boiling this past Monday in the Russell Senate Office Building, where Hayden, Mukasey, Woolsey and  other beneficiaries of the terrorism industry were whipping up terror themselves by presenting preposterous and catastrophic scenarios as potentially real.  Hayden went on at length about "The most dangerous weapons in the most dangerous hands," and another cukoo imagined the potential cataclysm arising from a conspiracy including the government of Iran, Colombian narco-guerrillas and Hugo Chavez, among others. Plus, one panelist claimed that jihadists are setting forest fires in Colorado.

  •  The hyper inflated hot air of Hayden (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aliasalias, rhutcheson, Simplify

    Hayden conflates history & inflates cyberthreats. He promotes the 'shock & awe' of fear mongering for profit and his own self-appointed and anointed place in history.

    Important to note that shortly after 9/11 Hayden entered into a super secret unlawful warrantless electronic surveillance program approved by the White House with NSA as the executive agent.

    This program as I found out early on turned the US into the equivalent of a foreign nation for the purpose of blanket dragnet electronic surveillance and data mining - completely bypassing the 4th Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in violation of the Constitution - going far beyond what was later called the Terrorist Surveillance Program as first publicly revealed in the blockbuster New York Times article in December 3005 by Eric Lichtblau and James Risen.

    He also made the ill-fated 'buy vs make' decision in Spring 2000 and went to military-industrial complex with a many billion dollar program called Trailblazer.

    When I was at NSA I participated in any number of executive sessions with Hayden after 9/11.

    He postured himself as the smartest person in the room and reserved the final analysis for any subject or issue under discussion for himself.

    And why not ask Hayden if there is any relationship between the dire situation he posits and his culpability in the failure to keep the US safe from 9/11.

    "Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - George Orwell

    by Thomas Drake on Fri Jul 13, 2012 at 12:20:07 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site