Skip to main content

Former Arizona Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070 and just about every other nativist shit stain on the books, was recalled last November. What made the victory so sweet, and sent a message to the legions of Arizona wingnuts, is that District 18 in Mesa, the district Pearce represented for 10 years, is extremely conservative. But even they had had enough of the bigot's divisive and counterproductive antics.

Pearce's chances were not helped in the recall when his campaign was caught red-handed running a sham candidate who, his team of Mensa darlings surmised, would siphon anti-Pearce votes away from Jerry Lewis, his opponent and eventual victor. And who would be the best candidate to appeal to voters who despise Pearce? A Hispanic woman of course!

So that's what his campaign did: they recruited Olivia Cortes, a grandmotherly type with no political experience, to be a third candidate—the idea being that Pearce haters, many of them Hispanic, would vote for her instead of Lewis, and Russell would emerge victorious in the 3-way race. When questioned, Cortes at first said she just wanted to provide an alternative voice, but it was clear in the one interview she did that Cortes didn't have a clue about matters of state. She had no campaign team, no money, no materials; it was impossible to figure out what her platform was, since she refused to host public events or talk to the press.

The media kept pressing the issue when the story really started to smell, and finally the brouhaha found itself in court, where Cortes testified that she didn't know who was paying for her campaign, including the political signs popping up around Mesa. Sadly, she came across like a useful idiot. Judge Burke said the scheme was disgustingly transparent, but he allowed her name to remain on the ballot:

Although the court finds that Cortes was "recruited" to run by [Pearce operative] Western, at the behest of Pearce supporters, to divert votes from Lewis for Pearce's benefit, this court is not convinced that courts should examine and be the final arbiter of the motives political candidates may have for running for election... New Times
Olivia Cortes put the matter to rest when she withdrew from the race almost immediately after the trial exposed the Pearce campaign's dirty tricks, and the strategy backfired big time on the Senator, who never recovered from the very public drubbing. In the Nov. 8 recall election the old buffoon lost by more than 12 points in a district that had elected him six times.

And now one of the men behind the charade is facing an ethics charge.

That's because Russell's brother, Lester Pearce, was a Mesa judge at the time, and he's knee-deep in the Cortes cesspool. He admitted during the media investigations of Cortes that he drove his daughters around Mesa to collect signatures for her candidacy. Stephen Lemons at New Times also revealed last year that the minutes of a GOP district meeting show Lester Pearce speaking on behalf of his brother:

VI. Legislators' Reports
1. Don Stapley, Maricopa County Supervisor
2. Justin Olson, AZ House District 19, Justin spoke in support of Senator Russell Pearce and against the recall.
3. Lester Pearce, North Mesa Justice Court - Lester Pearce spoke in support of Senator Russell Pearce and against the recall. New Times
Brahm Resnik at Channel 12 News (video link) notes that the minutes of that meeting have miraculously been amended, to read that Lester Pearce "spoke about the Constitution." Okaaay. Being a judge, Lester surely knows the old minutes, not to mention his help getting Cortes on the recall ballot, are a problem, since the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct says:
RULE 4.1. Political and Campaign Activities of Judges and Judicial Candidates in General
(A) A judge or a judicial candidate shall not do any of the following:...
(2) make speeches on behalf of a political organization or another candidate for public office;
(3) publicly endorse or oppose another candidate for any public office;...
(5) actively take part in any political campaign other than his or her own campaign for election, reelection or retention in office; PDF
Yesterday we learned that the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct is looking into Lester Pearce's role in his brother's recall campaign. That's a particularly messy problem for Lester now, because he resigned his judge's seat in May to run for a spot on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. Whoops!

The investigation won't help his campaign, which is already struggling. According to Lester's most recent campaign finance report (PDF), it looks like he has a helluva lot of support for his race. He notes $100,223.87 in contributions for a county race. Wow! But then look on page 2 where there's a little note:

a) Loans made by or guaranteed by candidate: $100,000.
In other words, Lester has pulled in a whopping $223.87 from the community for his race.

His disgraced and recalled brother, Russell, is also running again for the Senate, this time in a newly drawn district. Like Lester, he's not doing a very good job in the fundraising department, having been out-raised $2,800 to $67,000 by his primary opponent.

You'd think these fundy blowhards would get the message: We don't want you. You won't get our money, you won't get our vote. Just go home! If the courts don't send these criminal peckerheads packing, the voters will.

Originally posted to Maggie's Farm on Sat Jul 14, 2012 at 11:56 AM PDT.

Also republished by Baja Arizona Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site