We're already hearing that the 2012 election is going to be the most important election ever.  Before that, the 2010 election was the most important election ever.  Of course, the 2008 election was clearly the most important election ever, and I'm pretty sure I remember the 2004 and 2006 elections being described as the most important too.

How can this be?  How can every election be the most important ever?

We can answer this question with math.  At Daily Kos we often mention the Republicans "doubling down on crazy," but we rarely consider the mathematical consequences when this phenomenon is allowed to continue over time.  Expressed as a time function, "doubling down on crazy" becomes exponential crazy growth. The basic mathematics of exponential growth, when applied to crazy, can explain so much that is baffling about modern politics.

In contrast to political systems, the importance of exponential growth in biological systems is generally understood.  Exponential growth models can be used for all types of organisms, but bacteria fit particularly well because they reproduce by binary fission, in other words one bacterium becomes two identical bacteria.  Thus, in ideal conditions bacteria will divide at regular intervals to produce new generations each twice as large as its parent generation.

The simple math rapidly produces astronomical results:

 Generation Number of progeny 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 8 5 16 6 32 7 64 8 128 9 256 10 512 11 1,024 12 2,048 13 4,096 14 8,192 15 16,384 16 32,768 17 65,536 18 131,072 19 262,144 20 524,288 21 1,048,576
Notice that each number in the table is one greater than the total of all the numbers above it.

Any type of exponential growth can be expressed in terms of doubling times.  The "rule of 70" used for compound interest lets us skip some of the math here.  If your credit card bill grows at 20% interest, we can divide (70% / 20% per year) and see that your debt doubles every 3.5 years.  If your savings account is returning 1% interest, you can expect your balance to double about (70% / 1% per year) = 70 years from now.

So if we take the expression "doubling down" literally rather than figuratively, it means that the candidate or party has put twice as much crazy on the table as the previous wager.  If the "doubling down" continues, then each new bet contains more crazy than had been gambled in all previous bets since the doubling down began.

House rules usually limit the quantity of crazy chips played on a single hand.  Or, at least, they used to.  Today, "no limits" Texas Hold-'em is the most popular game of poker and apparently we're all playing "no limits" politics as well.

What has allowed this to happen?  If crazy is normally kept under control, what is now allowing it to grow out of control? Have Republicans lost an internal governor that self-regulates their internal crazy levels?  Or has the political environment changed in such a way that it no longer exerts any negative feedback against excessive crazy?

How long have we been in exponential crazy growth?

What is the doubling time of crazy in our political system?

What happens when crazy is allowed to grow out of control?

If every doubling time contains more crazy than all previous doubling periods combined, can we doubt that every election is more important than every previous election?

#### Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
 Unpublish Diary (The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.) Delete Diary (The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

#### Comment Preferences

• ##### Tip Jar(4+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Farkletoo, boophus, David54, denise b

• ##### Our side's crazy(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
David54

only goes up to 11.

• ##### Funny stuff(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
happymisanthropy

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room." - President Merkin Muffley