Skip to main content

The “big lie” is a propaganda technique linked to the Third Reich under Joseph Goebbels. The phrase itself was coined by Hitler in Mein Kampf; it was amplified years later by Goebbels, who generally gets credit for it (if credit is the right word). Goebbels claimed that the inspiration came from across the Channel: “The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it.” The Third Reich is long gone, but the “big lie” lives on.

The latest American exemplar is Governor Paul LePage (R-ME), who used his weekly radio address to call the Internal Revenue Service “the new Gestapo” for standing ready to collect the individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act. Never mind that the mandate was introduced in Massachusetts by Governor Mitt Romney, soon to be Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney; never mind that the mandate, though now ruled constitutional, doesn’t go into effect until 2014; it’s never too soon for the “big lie”.

LePage’s comment caused such a kerfuffle that he was driven to issue one of those boilerplate non-apology apologies: “It was not my intent to insult anyone,” LePage said in a statement, “especially the Jewish community.” It was apparently just fine, however, to slur and demean the I.R.S. by likening it to Hitler’s murdering secret police. And of course the non-retraction gave the governor one more chance to repeat and embellish the “big lie.”

“We are no longer a free people,” LePage said. “With every step that Obamacare moves forward, our individual freedoms are being stripped away by the federal government.” Our freedoms are being stripped away? The freedom to be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition? The freedom to go bankrupt paying for healthcare? The freedom to worry oneself sick about losing a job, knowing that should it happen the family’s health insurance could simply disappear?

The No. 1 “big lie,” relentlessly flogged, holds that the Affordable Care Act turns healthcare over to the federal government. The truth is almost the polar opposite; from the beginning, the liberal Left has hammered Obama over healthcare—first for the legislation’s huge concession to Big Pharma, then for drafting a reform dependent in every meaningful way on private insurance companies. Liberals always craved—and still crave—a single-payer, Medicare-for-all system.

Consider how perfectly the healthcare falsehoods that permeate the media meet the “big lie” criteria laid out in Mein Kampf:

“In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”
In Germany, and in every developed country in the world except the United States, all citizens are covered under universal healthcare programs. In Germany, and in every developed country other than America, healthcare is delivered for lower costs, often considerably lower, and with better outcomes.

Paul LePage’s obituary will likely include his “big lie” comparing the I.R.S. to Hitler’s Gestapo. The governor should also be remembered, hardly fondly, for using “big lies” to propagandize Americans against decent healthcare as a right for all citizens.


This piece originally appeared online in the Baltimore Chronicle (under a different headline) and at BuzzFlash/truthout.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thank you for this, from (0+ / 0-)

    a member of the 61%. It deserves to not fade from the national spotlight and the state's immediate agenda, which would be getting our Sect'y of State(who is running for Snowe's US Senate seat) to declare him incompetent, and stand him down.
    We don't have the power of recall, but HolyShitsnacks something must be done here.

    "On a normal dog day, I can sit still for hours on end with no effort." enzo, The Art of Racing in the Rain

    by rebereads on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 08:57:54 AM PDT

    •  LePage (0+ / 0-)

      I hadn't realized (until his Gestapo comment) how around-the-bend LePage has been. I don't think of Maine as being that kind of state. How did he manage manage to reach the Governor's office in the first place? (And what's "the 61%"? Forgive me, but that's new to me.)

      •  LePage won w/ aprx 38%... (0+ / 0-)

        ...of the vote in a three way race in 2010. Without mandate and a razor thin House GOP majority, a Senate won by the last minute infusion of hundreds of thousands of dollars (big money in small Maine) into five Senate races, 61% represents the faction of voters who rejected Paul LePage in the first place.

        To learn more about how far out on the right wing limb the Governor has gone, time and time again with hyperbole, denigrating comments, and bully tactics straight from his office, I invite you to peruse .

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site