Skip to main content

This very presidential election had as much to do in 1999 with the decision by the Mormon Church to eleveate Mitt Romney to the position of "Olympic Savior", as did his qualifications/prospects for doing the job that they selected him for. And lest my contention be doubted, please note that I maintained the very same thing at that time.

Did Romney get the job done? Certainly. But most of the elements were already in place, and it was openly rumored here in Salt Lake that members of the mormon billionaire Huntsman family, and the mormom billionaire Marriott family, along with a number of other extremely experienced, successful, and well connected mormon members of the national business leadership community were also under consideration for the position. (And this being Utah, don't think for a minute that anyone not selected by the Mormons was going to get the job.) The one characteristic, however, that set Mitt Romney apart from this very large field of excellent "applicants" was name recognition, with the name recognized on the national scene being that of George Romney.

(1) Were the Mormons in the drivers seat? The extent of Mormon land holdings in downtown Salt Lake is probably not familiar to outsiders. Suffice it to say, having entire city blocks of land made available to SLOC (Salt Lake Organizing Committee) at a rental cost of $1.00 was an extremely advantageous arrangement, the details of which had already been setteled in principle, and the usage of which had already been employed for planning purposes. Remember the veritable hours of T.V. time spent showcasing Medals Winners and the Mormom Temple simultaneously? That was not a coincidence. And the value of that certainly could have been great enough to keep the longstanding deal in place by itself. But if you think that millions of dollars of worldwide exposure AND gaining traction for a future Mormon run at the White House is beyond the ability of Mormon leadership to see the value of, and to polish up an already sweet deal by implementing, then you don't know Mormon leadership.

(2) By 1999 what had already been accomplished was huge in comparison to what remained to be done. Being the reddest of the red states meant Utah had a very senior Congressional Delegation, and this meant that the money to rebuild our freeway, and to create our modern light rail transit system had already been appropriated (to the tune of over $1 billion, as I recall). Further, funding was already in place to build an athletes village on federal land neighboring on the Campus of the University of Utah, and to have the entire package end up in State/University hands after the allotted one time use (the old Oly Village is now modern student housing, and the old student housing is now future U of U expansion). I mean, a ton of these kinds of things were already in place (many of them for several years) before the 1999 leadership handoff ever took place. With this much heavy lifting already having been done, (and with that shadow Board of Directors in place on the top floor of The Church Office Building) turning the SLOC broken eggs into an omelette was a job well within the competency of any number of persons.

And, yeah, the Mormons ended up with a potentially deeply flawed Presidential Candiate. But it's still a win/win! "Mormonism as a Cult" is clearly on the wane as more and more evangelicals now come to terms with the fact that 2012 is now Obama or Romney. And The Mormon Church runs a massive world wide Missionary program, the credibility of which clearly becomes enhanced in many eyes by the Romney candidacy.

And, who, knows, they could still get lucky and win the whole jackpot!

(I mean, is there anything any crazier than Mormom Harry Reid being the Senator from Sin City?)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (18+ / 0-)

    There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

    by oldpotsmuggler on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 02:01:51 PM PDT

  •  I'm Jewish and find this attack on Mormonism (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Utahrd, MKSinSA

    more than troubling.  Why is Romney "the Mormon candidate" just because he is Mormon?  Hasn't anyone heard of local community and local business leaders and local money promoting their cities for the Olympics and similar events?  If the Olympics were in Jerusalem or Rome, would this become a Jewish or Catholic conspiracy?  I had hoped that in the United States in 2012 we were beyond this.

    "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

    by Navy Vet Terp on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 02:28:06 PM PDT

    •  How about if the Catholic Church allowed free (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      use of the Vatican as a medals plaza (and chose the head of the entity staging the Olympics, who coincidentally was a Catholc)? Would that be a Catholic Olympics?

      And how is this an attack on Mormonism? They did what they did, and it was all legal.

      There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

      by oldpotsmuggler on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 03:01:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  agreed -- this is not an attack (0+ / 0-)

        It's how well run organizations (religious or not) plan, evidently and how they play their cards well.

        •  Not that it really matters either way, but it (0+ / 0-)

          seems highly unlikely to me that any issue would arise under a Romney presidency that would cause the Mormon leaership, to take advantage of a special path of access to The President. (And that presupposes that there is no validity to the local belief that we are in "The Later Days", when governmental power in this country will be transfered to The Mormon Church, and the seat of national gpvernment will be relocated to Salt Lake. I guess if that did happen, then all bets would be off.)

          There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

          by oldpotsmuggler on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 03:49:20 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  For good or ill, as you well know, Temple Square (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        is the heart of SLC.  In that regard, but for the old Roman athletic monuments (and the issues of state sovereignty), as an enormous and fairly beautiful public space, holding ceremonies in St. Peter's Square would not be that strange for a Roman Olympics.  Similarly, I'm no Mormon, but the area around Temple Square is lovely.

        "The first drawback of anger is that it destroys your inner peace; the second is that it distorts your view of reality. If you come to understand that anger is really unhelpful, you can begin to distance yourself from anger." - The Dalai Lama

        by auron renouille on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 03:10:53 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  The Opening and Closing Ceremonies were on Campus (0+ / 0-)

          miles from downtown, and there were no sports venues within the boundaries of Salt Lake City. I think that it's a little known fact that Salt Lake City is one of the few minicipalities in Utah with a non-Mormon majority.

          There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

          by oldpotsmuggler on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 03:54:48 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  The first Mormon to win the Presidency... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Utahrd, MKSinSA

    ...will be a Democrat.

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 02:31:56 PM PDT

  •  OT (or not), one thing... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ...that I've noticed about those games is that the merchandising was furious.  (And all the recent games have had lots of merchandising.)  I've collected Olympic pins from a number of games over the years, along with a few other trinkets.  None since seems to have had the sheer number of pins (nonsponsor) or other trinkets.  It would be interesting to see just where all that money went.  

    Stay Democratic, my friends. -The Most Interesting Man in the World

    by boran2 on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 02:43:36 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site