I am amazed at the distortions and lies that fly by the surrogates for Obama in the media and the fact that frequently the progressives have no answers to correct them or further questions to ask. When that happens, it appears to some that the accusations must be true.
Let's list the ones you have heard that are not being dealt with sufficiently and put the facts here so that at least we can refute what our friends, family, and colleagues say.
One of the best questions I have seen asked only on this forum is: Why was Romney still working on the Olympics in 2002? Why had he not either gone back to Bain or resigned officially? If he was still negotiating his share of the pie, then was he not still a part of the company?
One that have seen and heard lately is that the stimulus money went to outsourced companies. It is my understanding that the money went to companies who then decided to use it for outsourcing, which is part of the problem in my opinion. This is one that I don't hear being answered by the surrogates. Is my understanding correct?
There is justified targeting of outsourcing, but shouldn't there also be mentions of just flat shutting down businesses totally but still having Bain people walk away with millions? They stacked the deck so that they could skim off money and left the people with pensions, benefits, and wages gone. When the government had to help with the pensions, it was again a case of private gains, government (taxpayers) loss.
What are some of the accusations that you see/hear that are not being countered with facts? I think the Rs get their talking points ready and we don't always do that--especially when appearing in the media.