Skip to main content

Radical Muslims in our government? That is only the surface of Michele Bachmann's REAL concerns

Much has already been written about the frivolous (many would say dangerous) claims Michele Bachmann has made about radical Islamic influence in our government. No need to revisit those; and the comparisons with Joe McCarthy have been well documented. Actually, since I lived in the McCarthy era, I can attest to the validity of those contentions. However, if you drill deeper into the Bachmann phenomena, there are factors in her actions that are mostly unexplored, and worthy of comment.

On the surface, Bachmann shows concern for the security of our government. Also, the idea that she is seeking attention is plausible. But underneath these two issues, is a darker and larger one – and I believe her actions are merely a metaphor for that larger issue. That would be the changing color, demographics, and “character” of America – and Bachmann, knowingly or not, has “tapped” into that fear. It also explains, to some extent, the incredible dislike (some would even say “hate”) that Barack Obama engenders among certain groups – a fear and dislike that goes well beyond similar or even rational criticism of previous presidents. For that reason, explaining the hostility towards Obama, helps explain Bachmann’s rationale.

The dislike of Obama has multiple layers. His detractors, like Bachmann, “claim” it is his policies; “socialist” tendencies; and radical ideas. None of these hold much water, because in fact, he has been largely a moderate president, and most of what he has proposed is well into the mainstream. Then of course Bachmann herself accused him of being unpatriotic (claiming he had “anti-American” tendencies). That, too would be a hard claim to substantiate given the aggressive stand and success he has had in foreign policy issues.  Finally, there would be his color – but bigotry is not much in fashion politically at least, so that does not fly either. What then…and what is Bachmann’s real concern?

In my opinion it is the xenophobic fear many (and mostly white) Americans have as our country changes from a largely white/European nation to one of color, and non-Christian values. Barack Obama is a symbol, a foreshadowing of that change. And to many white Americans that is unsettling, unpleasant, and frankly…scary! They hope, and believe that ridding the country of Obama will stop that trend, and as they say “take back our country”! These are telling words. Take back our country. To whom, from whom? And that is what Michele Bachmann and her followers are aggressively pursuing, as she goes after Muslims in government with her smoke and mirrors.

Taking this assumption further, Obama is not just our first black president, he has that funny name. American presidents, of all historic periods have had “solid European names” like Jefferson, Jackson, and more recently Johnson, Carter, Clinton and Bush.  Not “Obama”. That’s the way is should be according to conservative Americans.  Moreover, Michelle Obama does not “look” like an American First Lady should. They were staid, “knew their place”…and white! Again, as Michele Bachmann recently said: “everything I needed to know I learned in Iowa” – (note, not Indonesia, Chicago, or Columbia University). Iowa…that’s as American as apple pie. An America Bachmann may still dream of.

While hostility toward becoming a non-white America is not new, this time stifling immigration, and stopping the coming change of “color” in America likely will not work. In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, barring Chinese laborers from coming to the United States. The Immigration Act of 1924 established the national origins quota system, which was aimed at restricting southern and eastern Europeans; it also prohibited immigration of East Asians and Asian Indians.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished the national-origin quotas and opened the way for a surge in immigration.  The result of this is what scares many Bachmann’s followers now.

The reality is non-Hispanic whites are projected to no longer make up the majority of the population by 2042, according to the Census Bureau. In 2050 they will compose just 46.3% of the population. Non-Hispanic whites made up 85% of the population in 1960.  However, the U.S. population growth between 2000 and 2010 was driven almost exclusively by racial and ethnic minorities. And even worse news for those who fear this change, it is projected that 82% of the increase in population from 2005 to 2050 will be due to that dreaded immigration, including many Muslims Bachmann so “fears”.

No, the animus, the hostility, the enmity the Bachmann’s of our country now express goes beyond frivolous charges of dangerous “aliens” in our government. It is based on something far deeper -- a gut wrenching fear of color/demographic/religious change in our nation.  The foreshadowing of an America we have not yet seen…but are relentlessly approaching just over the horizon. Frankly, that is exceedingly frightening to a great many people; and frankly, Barack Obama is simply the first one they can see coming over that hill. It really won’t change things, never the less; they are desperately engaged in a vigorous but futile hope that they can “take back our country”!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This is my sense of her, too. (4+ / 0-)

    The big thing you keep hearing at tea party rallies is either "They are taking my country" or "I want my country back."  These assertions seem so odd to us that we tend to be cynical about them, and suspect that they are a smokescreen hiding a more rational agenda.  But I think when tea partiers say this, they're simply telling what they believe is the truth.  "Their country" is a place full of white Christians (and a few Jews) in which Hispanics virtually don't exist, African Americans and gay people know their place (which is prison) and women are content with a life of private sacrifice.  Obama is the repudiation of all of this, and it terrifies them.  It's not a coincidence that the tea party tracks radically white and old.  I don't know what the average age of a tea partier is; I know the average Rush Limbaugh listerner is 76.  The Fox News audience is only a few years younger than that.  For these people, lilly white Mayberry is America, and they are losing their marbles because they fear that THAT America, if it ever really existed at all, is becoming extinct.  They're right:  it is.

    •  One also wonders... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      raster44, JDsg

      Not only is that "ideal" America on the way to extinction: lots of people whose ethnic/religious/etc. groups have been excluded by the earlier (majority white) establishment are going to be running the place.

      So one wonders if, perhaps, the remnant of the hypothetical ideal America are worried about whether the people they treated badly are going to return the favor.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site