Skip to main content

Those of us who loved H.S. Thompson especially appreciated that he understood Nixon and all he stood for better than any other journalist of that time.  Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72 remains a signal work b/c of Thompson's ability to plumb the depths of Nixonism.  Pierce has a similarly unique ability to plumb the depths of Romneyism, and he apparently does so w/o consuming large quantities of drugs and alcohol.  This piece on Pierce's blog today shows how deeply and profoundly he understands his former governor.

Pierce begins the piece by noting how the son of a one-time presidential candidate who was largely undone by one gaffe has survived a series of equally or more serious gaffes:

It is a capital mistake in judging an American political campaign to fail to take into account the effectiveness of the purely cynical. Over the past month or so, the campaign of Willard Romney, the onetime, one-term, now largely unrecognizable governor of Massachusetts, has engaged in a series of gaffes and missteps, a positive gavotte of dick-stepping both here and abroad, from which most political wise guys agree it should have difficulty recovering. He can't talk about domestic issues with sounding like the worst patrician foof in the history of watercress. He goes overseas and pisses off the Brits, praises the pale pink socialist wonderland that is the Israeli national health-care system while also gleefully tossing a few matches into the open gas tank of the Israeli-Palestinian relationship, and, on the whole, demonstrates that, in the field of foreign policy, he'll pretty much believe anything he's told by the rags-and-bones neo-con retreads he's hired.
Romney is the Rasputin of American politics.  He has, thus far, survived pitfalls, pratfalls and fundamental weaknesses that would've killed most any other presidential candidate.  His obvious parallels to a recent Harvard MBA POTUS who was the manifestly arrogant scion of a political dynasty are generally ignored.  As Pierce notes :
Romney continues to stubbornly refuse, in the face of a general outcry from within his own party, to release more than two years of his tax returns. He is the most easily mockable candidate in decades. (By contrast, it took real work, and a lot of money, to make John Kerry look ridiculous.) And, most spectacularly of all, only four years after the excesses of unregulated vulture capitalism nearly ate the world, stealing everything it could steal and wrecking what was left behind, with 25 million Americans either underemployed, unemployed, or vanished from the statistics entirely, the Republicans not only have chosen as their nominee a guy who made almost every dime of his money in the legalized freebooting that passed for a business community over the past 30 years, but also they have decided to run him as the guy who will fix the broken middle class, and return the country to full employment, by re-instituting all the policies that created the disaster in the first place.

And, by and large, it's working.


This 'graf analyzes the threat that Romney's campaign poses to basic concepts of self-government.  Quick subtraction shows that the profound cynicism of that campaign traces its origins to Nixon's time:

For going on 40 years now, we have been encouraged in our cynicism by the very forces of which Mitt Romney is a perfect product. The ideal of a self-governing political commonwealth did not break down in the public mind because we got smarter, or it got obsolete. It was deliberately demolished, brick by brick, by people who knew what they were doing and did it very well. They replaced it with an artificial form of populism by which self-government was destroyed as a viable option so that something called "government" could be created in its place as a kind of alien entity. The political commonwealth that was the underpinning of self-government was replaced by a consensus of cynicism freely arrived at. The entire political system was complicit in this development, but the political rewards fell almost exclusively to the rising vandal conservatism that reached its apotheosis under George W. Bush. Barack Obama supposedly was elected as a reaction against all of this and, by the time he was in office for a month, people already were calling him a failure. Now, running for re-election, the strongest and most effective sub rosa argument against the president returning to office seems to be that he failed to break down the cynicism that we are too terrified to admit is the only viable political energy left in a desiccated political process. So, perhaps, the country turns to a man who has fashioned his entire political career out of the energy of that cynicism, who can ride it like a wave.

I have vague memories of growing up in a country where trusting the president was the default option and in which news anchors like Cronkite and Huntley were viewed like favorite uncles.  I confess that I mist up a little when I see the "Newsroom" intro showing B&W clips of Murrow and those 2 legends.  One can argue endlessly how and why that country is now basically as dead as the liberal brand of Republicanism for which Aaron Sorkin so visibly pines.  One can't argue, however, that, like Nixon, Reagan, and the 2 Bushes (esp. the latter one), Romney is throwing shovefuls of dirt on the coffin in which that country is buried.

Pierce closes w/ the following observations:

Romney is the ideal presidential candidate for people who have been taught to hate and fear the government he purports to want to lead. He is the triumph of the cynical paradox of the person who runs for political office on the premise that he is not a politician, a sucker play for which we fall, over and over again. He is the perfect marionette in the puppet show that the new big money has made out of our politics, an exercise in political mummery guaranteed to intensify the cynicism that most people feel about the system by increasing their distance from it. (The spate of voter-suppression laws work to do this, too. Distance people from the political process that produces the people who make their laws, and you distance them from influencing how those laws get made, which makes them either futilely angry, or depressingly docile. In either case, you get what you want.) He is the perfect product of the political age we created for ourselves.

So mock him, if it makes you feel better. Hell, I do, pretty much every day. He's a very big fish in a very small barrel, Willard Romney is. But do so full in the knowledge that, in his cynicism, and in the almost gleeful way he parades his least attractive qualities, and his most monumental lies, through the public square, Willard Romney is more in tune with the political zeitgeist than Barack Obama has been since the fall of 2008. And know that this election is still tied.

I have little to add to this masterpiece except to note that it doesn't address the impact of U3 figures that spent many months over 9% and that linger over 8% now.  No postwar president has ever been re-elected w/ U3 over 7.2% in November of the election year, and it's widely assumed that U3 will stay over 8% until November.  If it somehow falls below that threshold, I suspect that the dynamic of this race will quickly change.  

That quibble aside, this piece demonstrates the profoundly toxic impact of Romneyism on the body politic, and it places Romneyism in its proper historical context.  I wish that the MSM would perceive even part of what Pierce perceives.  Perhaps the shabby treatment of the press corps on Romney's Less than Excellent Adventure abroad will change that perception.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Do you mean (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoundDog, Kinak, RFK Lives, Smoh, JVolvo

    "w/o" in that first graf?  I'm cool either way, mind you.

  •  I dunno (0+ / 0-)

    This strikes me as overwrought -- seeing great cultural significance in Romney's "surprising" failure to fail. As you note in your postscript, the economy sucks. Full Stop.

    ...Pierce claims that Mittens is in tune with the Zeigeist, failing to note that his personal approval numbers are godawful.

    •  It's a both/and, not either/or question IMHO (6+ / 0-)

      If U3 were a point lower, Obama's re-election would be a foregone conclusion.  Were it even to drop to, say, 7.7%, this race would not be close.  Still, Romney's ability to survive a campaign that hits new lows on almost a daily basis says something about how far we have sunk.

      As the piece also notes:

      No misstep is bad enough that it cannot be disappeared from our collective mind by a few dozen more commercials. The memory hole in this election is located in Sheldon Adelson's wallet.
      Nixon had to get by w/ the likes of W. Clement Stone buying ambassadorships.  Imagine what Tricky Dick might've done w/ sugar daddies like Adelson.

      Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream of things that never were and ask why not?

      by RFK Lives on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 09:43:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  aww..... Do I have to? (0+ / 0-)
        Imagine what Tricky Dick might've done w/ sugar daddies like Adelson.
        I already called Mitt Nixon II in another diary today.

        But haven't the energy to imagine what Dick could have done on steroids.

        "extreme concentration of income is incompatible with real democracy.... the truth is that the whole nature of our society is at stake." Paul Krugman

        by Gorette on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 12:10:56 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  The influence of cynicism (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Smoh, Catte Nappe

      should not be minimized.

      It's cynicism that leads people to believe that government cannot help make the economy better; that, indeed, anything that government does can only make the economy worse. That cynicism made it nearly impossible for Obama to get even a crippled stimulus passed, and made it nearly miraculous that a crippled ACA managed to get through. And because the stimulus was so crippled, and because the ACA is not what it could have been, people are deeply disappointed and angry. And their anger is vented, not at the purveyors of cynicism, but at President Obama.

      And Pierce is right: Romney is expertly riding the tide of cynicism. It's the major enabler of his lies, and those lies feed back into more cynicism.

      Let us all have the strength to see the humanity in our enemies, and the courage to let them see the humanity in ourselves.

      by Nowhere Man on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 10:18:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Cynics are willing to believe government can help (0+ / 0-)

        But assume it will choose not to, and may actively and deliberatly choose harm.

        from a bright young conservative: “I’m watching my first GOP debate…and WE SOUND LIKE CRAZY PEOPLE!!!!”

        by Catte Nappe on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 11:53:53 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  The Zeitgeist is (0+ / 0-)

      the American Right having no idea what to do or why and knowing that a large portion of itself is dead/dying.  Annoying The Living Liberals becomes the end in itself.

      The good news for us: if they get voted in, their getting voted out again is now a kind of comprehensive cultural disaster for them resulting in implosion.  There's nothing left in 2016 for them except a lot of hollow Godmongering.

  •  What is that famous quote of the goal of (5+ / 0-)

    conservatives is to have a government so weak and small they can strangle it in the bathtub?

    But, in our complicated modern world, we've seen proof over and over of the vital role government plays in protecting the common good.  Every time financial regulation becomes insufficient with have financial collapses.  Most here are hold enough to remember Love Canal, burning rivers, and the consequences of insufficient environmental regulation.

    We need to elect leaders who believe government can and should make a difference in our lives and work to make it efficient and effective.

    We need to raise the point that in a democracy, those using voter suppression, and other tricks to undermine our democracy and government are not just unpatriotic, but treasoness and anti-American.

    The means is the ends in the process of becoming. - Mahatma Gandhi

    by HoundDog on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 09:32:42 AM PDT

  •  Glad I read right through. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    cany, Nowhere Man, Smoh, JVolvo

    My original intention was to skim, because I have a low tolerance for pundits -- even our own.  But I found a remarkably cogent analysis -- and snappy, too.

    "The extinction of the human race will come from its inability to EMOTIONALLY comprehend the exponential function." -- Edward Teller

    by lgmcp on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 10:05:42 AM PDT

  •  this guy is wrong. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    What Mitt is sitting on, is the floor of his anti-Obama support.  It's made of cement, and is buttressed by steel.  It ain't going anywhere.

    What Mitt has to do, and he's incapable of doing, is making the POSITIVE plea to the voters, that he is one of them, and that he will look out for them.

    Anyone seeing THAT happen in three months?

    "A recent study reveals Americans' heads are larger than they were 150 years ago but sadly there is no indication that the extra room is used for anything." - entlord

    by AlyoshaKaramazov on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 10:46:47 AM PDT

    •  Or, he could depress turnout of those people (0+ / 0-)

      who want the positive message.

      In part, the republicans don't mind government and politics looking bad, even if they are to blame for it, because they aren't trying to win hearts and minds, they are trying to depress turnout so that their base wins. Rs demonstrate that no we can't, it's no use, the fix is in, the system is corrup, so you might as well stay home.

      That, I think, is Pierce's point.  

      "My taxes are of the legally correct height, and the core reason for my campaign is to make them a different, lower height, and it is none of your business what precisely either of those heights might be." Mitt, as channelled by Hunter.

      by Inland on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 01:02:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site