Skip to main content

(Original non-sexy title: "This is How Voter ID Laws Ought to Work")

This should be the federal law regarding voter ID:

(1) Pollworkers should have access to computerized voter registration files.

(2) If the state requires voter photo ID, these files should contain a digital copy of whatever voter photo ID the state requires.

(3) Voters may, but need not, bring their own copy of their photo voter ID.

(4) If the identity of a voter is challenged, refer to the photo on the computer file to verify identity.

(5) If the voter does not have ID, there should be provisions for a poll worker to take a photo of them right then and there with a digital camera and upload it to a database (separate from the vote count) indicating their identity; this will subsequently serve as their voter ID for future elections.  There should be no cost for this service and it may be that we'd want a physical card to be mailed to the voter subsequently.

(6) If there is any serious concern about a given voter's identity, maybe the voter could be required to vote by a provisional ballot until their identity is confirmed after the election, but this should not be easy (and perhaps the loser in the challenge pays the cost.)

(7) If a state does not have a copy of the photo voter ID on file, federal law should preclude its ability to deny anyone the ability to vote.

Some extrapolation and analysis below.

Voter ID is absolutely a kind of "poll tax," barred by the 24th Amendment, although its cost is in time and effort as well as in money.

It is absolutely unnecessary to have individual voters procure such an ID before the election or have it with them at the polls.  If the state wants to impose the requirement, the state can keep the files online.  We have this thing called the Internet now.  Thumb drives with photo voter ID for all voters in a precinct could be made available to poll workers as well in the event of an Internet outage.

The argument for voter ID does not sound stupid to voters; even if fraud is rare (or almost unheard of) here, it's theoretically possible.  So we don't need to fight it head on.  We just have to say that if a state wants to require photo ID of voters, it has to have its own copy of that photo ID on-hand so that voters are not denied the right to vote if they cannot get to a place that issues ID or if their ID is lost or stolen.  Otherwise, it's a poll tax.

Congress could pass a law with this requirement this year.  If states want to enforce their voter ID laws this year, they had better get cracking and compile those databases.  The states can have their laws so long as they accept the (fairly minimal) commensurate burdens.

I think that we'll find, though, that when if and when voter photo ID is no longer a useful way to prevent disfavored people from voting, its proponents may lose interest in demanding it.  What would be the point then -- good government or something?

If states wouldn't agree to these sorts of requirements, then their motives are suspect and they should not be able to enforce their voter ID laws.  Problem solved.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

claude, Renee, Sylv, Errol, RF, PrahaPartizan, teacherken, glitterscale, native, Shockwave, WI Deadhead, opinionated, bronte17, 88kathy, cskendrick, fugwb, Wee Mama, highacidity, themank, Nate Roberts, arreay, CocoaLove, psnyder, TexDem, Miss Jones, HeyMikey, wdrath, zerelda, Sembtex, Curt Matlock, lonespark, KayCeSF, Gowrie Gal, bloomer 101, 3goldens, NoMoreLies, revbludge, HudsonValleyMark, Erik the Red, caliberal2001, Clem Yeobright, llywrch, sandrad23, eru, majcmb1, where4art, Ice Blue, kaliope, jtg, HiBob, littlewren, Jim R, begone, Reality Bites Back, third Party please, cre8fire, BachFan, tobendaro, tonyahky, cookseytalbott, kestrel9000, Shakludanto, philipmerrill, Zwoof, BlueMississippi, engine17, CA Nana, BB10, blueoregon, DBunn, Cronesense, camlbacker, Dartagnan, edsbrooklyn, tbirchard, terabytes, newpioneer, bnasley, rantsposition, artisan, vikingrob, SeaTurtle, Rumarhazzit, uciguy30, skod, JayC, seriously70, ChocolateChris, dadadata, elwior, Buckeye Nut Schell, lineatus, thetadelta, VL Baker, jakebob, jamess, pamelabrown, hwmnbn, bluesheep, Jeff Y, WoodlandsPerson, mofembot, codairem, Gemina13, chemborg, emidesu, HarpboyAK, JamieG from Md, wv voice of reason, clent, mjkellett, divineorder, hummingbird4015, Nebraskablue, CamillesDad1, elziax, sfarkash, astral66, Larsstephens, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, commonmass, smileycreek, David PA, pdx kirk, drainflake77, David Harris Gershon, jethrock, Orlaine, eb23, Puddytat, sharonsz, ericlewis0, eclecta, soaglow, mama jo, slowbutsure, FarWestGirl, CoExistNow, Jasonhouse, KVoimakas, chira2, MinistryOfTruth, sound of progress, StateOfGrace, JoeEngineer, Marihilda, BoulderStevo, No one gets out alive, jacey, JTinDC, cwsmoke, IndieGuy, a2nite, 2thanks, Letsgetitdone, Lorinda Pike, TexDemAtty, jan4insight, MartyM, doroma, oldpotsmuggler, TheLawnRanger, Greenfinches, Blue Bell Bookworm, DamselleFly, onceasgt, Setsuna Mudo, poopdogcomedy, howabout, northerntier, Occam was an optimist

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site