Skip to main content

Vice Presidential (VP) candidates seem to get vetted more than Presidential candidates, which amuses me. People being considered for VP have to provide information to the party’s nominee about all sorts of private information that could become an issue after the convention: tax returns, medical records, lawsuits/criminal convictions, psychiatric or substance-abuse problems, credit reports, accusations of plagiarism or doctored résumés, stories of family scandals, etc. They’re asked about any little thing that could become an issue.

Does anyone remember George McGovern’s first choice for VP, Tom Eagleton? After he was chosen, it turned out he had gone through electro-convulsive therapy (aka electroshock treatments) for psychiatric problems, which might have included depression and/or nervous exhaustion. McGovern dropped him and switched to Sargent Shriver (Maria’s father). I still think McGovern would have been 100 times better than Nixon. That was the first time I volunteered to work on a campaign. Oh well. Sometimes we Democrats lose the election.

More below the orange madeleine of temps perdu.

I’d like to know if Romney is asking the people on his short list for their tax returns. He should. He wouldn’t want any nasty surprises. When McCain was vetting Romney as a possible VP, he asked Romney for his tax returns. And Romney provided them.

I’ve been thinking about who Romney might pick for VP.  He could select one or more of several strategies:

The Geographic Strategy: Pick someone from a state with a decent number of electoral votes that is not solid red or solid blue. In other words, go for a high value state that might otherwise vote for Obama. Maybe FL, NC, VA, PA, OH, MI, WI, or MN. A state with at least 10 electoral votes. Not Wyoming or Maine. Not California (too blue) or Texas (too red).

The Demographic Strategy: Pick someone who might appeal to voters in the same category as the VP choice. Maybe a woman or a Hispanic or an African-American (yeah, good luck with that) or someone with an East-Indian heritage (which I suppose would be have to be either Bobby Jindal or Nikki Haley). Picking a woman didn't work out very well for McCain.

The Debate Strategy: Pick someone who is smart and eloquent, who could argue with Joe Biden in the one televised debate (two at the most). Someone who could give good speeches and make jokes and not sound completely idiotic (which means not Sarah Palin or Dan Quayle or anybody like that).

The Lunatic Strategy: Pick someone who’s an insane tea-party Ayn Rand or Ron Paul guy or a zany fundamentalist Christian, who will mollify the right wing of the Republican Party and shore up the old white guy vote.

My words are just dust in the wind. Romney will use whatever criteria appeal to him and he will pick someone for VP and pundits will call him either idiotic or brilliant. And then we’ll have the election and Romney will lose. But it’s kind of interesting to think about who he will choose.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Any thoughts, pro or con? (4+ / 0-)

    I think Romney can't possibly pick a VP that will help him out of the hole he's dug. But I might be wrong.

    But the angle said to them, "Do not be Alfred. A sailor has been born to you"

    by Dbug on Thu Aug 09, 2012 at 10:41:49 PM PDT

  •  It's essential to have at least one taxpayer (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dbug, YaNevaNo, opinionated, Inland

    on the ticket. Or so I'd like to think.

    "I was a big supporter of waterboarding" - Dick Cheney 2/14/10

    by Bob Love on Thu Aug 09, 2012 at 10:49:34 PM PDT

  •  He can just not bother with the taxes (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Romney can use this to his advantage.  When he is asked about tax returns from his running mate, Romney can say he didn't ask his running mate for his tax returns because that is a violation of his privacy.

    Romney should go on the offense here and fight for his right to privacy.

    Republicans: Taking the country back ... to the 19th century

    by yet another liberal on Thu Aug 09, 2012 at 10:53:34 PM PDT

  •  not really (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    People being considered for VP have to provide information to the party’s nominee about all sorts of private information that could become an issue after the convention:
    Actually they don't 'have' to provide any of it. Though i imagine that refusing would reduce the chance they are chosen.

    Even the disclousure rules for president wrt tax returns probably would not survive a court challenge if it were ever made. The only requirements for the office are listed in the constitution.

  •  Yes, he'll demand it. And they'll laugh about it. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Yes, he'll demand it the tax returns and the VP pick will give them up. And they'll laugh about it. Both will be in on the joke - The elite run the world and the public has a nasty habit of getting in the way.

    At this point he better pick Paul Ryan. After the Wall Street Journal, and others, highly recommended picking him recently I think he will really piss off some wingnuts if he goes rogue. They are already talking about him like an dog that needs to be housebroken.

    ...the train's got its brakes on and the whistle is screaming.

    by themank on Fri Aug 10, 2012 at 01:09:54 AM PDT

  •  He'll definitely be asked by the press, (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    msdobie, Dbug

    "So, Mister Not-Gonna-Show-My-Tax-Returns, did you require the VP to show you his tax returns?"

  •  T & R for the McGovern reference (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    opinionated, Dbug

    He was my first vote in a presidential election.....

    I am a warrior for peace. And not a gentle man... Steve Mason, 1940-2005

    by Wayward Wind on Fri Aug 10, 2012 at 01:31:04 AM PDT

  •  he will but he won't release them (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    these are the kinds of things discussed in quiet rooms

    which means the rest of us can go f*%k ourselves before he will let us know any such financial information

    The Senate would refuse to confirm a nominee who refused to release relevant information

    the American people should refuse to elect a candidate who refuses to be transparent

    "what the best and wisest parent wants for his child is what we should want for all the children of the community" - John Dewey

    by teacherken on Fri Aug 10, 2012 at 04:51:44 AM PDT

  •  He should just pick his horse (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Really, could it do any worse than any of those other choices? At least it couldn't possibly say anything worse than Mitt already has.

    "Dethklok has summoned a troll." "That's impossible; there's no such thing as trolls." "Then how do you explain the dead unicorns?"

    by kamrom on Fri Aug 10, 2012 at 08:41:42 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site