Skip to main content

according to Romney internal talking points, Romney will not embrace the Ryan plan
@PeterHambyCNN via web
The craziest thing so far about today are the reports that now that Mitt Romney has picked Paul Ryan, he is going to abandon his support for Paul Ryan's budget. It seems too crazy to be true, but CNN is reporting that's what's the Romney campaign is saying.

Here's a passage directly from the Romney talking points:

Questions and Answers About The Romney/Ryan Ticket:

1) Does this mean Mitt Romney is adopting the Paul Ryan plan?

· Gov. Romney applauds Paul Ryan for going in the right direction with his budget, and as president he will be putting together his own plan for cutting the deficit and putting the budget on a path to balance.

That's absolute craziness right there. I mean, Romney has already gotten behind the Ryan plan. Now he's picked him as his VP candidate. And yet he's trying to put off saying what his fiscal plan would be? That statement literally says Romney won't reveal his plan until he's president. That's a whacky enough idea on its own ... but he already has put his ideas out there. And his ideas are Paul Ryan's ideas!

There's no chance they will get away with this, though. The Obama campaign is not about to let people forget that Romney has spent the entire campaign raving about Ryan's plan and attacking people like Newt Gingrich who questioned it ... and now he's named Ryan to his ticket. They can't distance themselves from Ryan and it's crazy to try.

7:38 AM PT: Here's another passage from the same document, again trying to create space between Romney and his pick for VP:

2) Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have different views on some policy areas – like Medicare spending, entitlement reform, labor, etc. – do you think those differences are going to hurt or help?

· Of course they aren’t going to have the same view on every issue. But they both share the view that this election is a choice about two fundamentally different paths for this country.

This is such a weird—and defensive—communications strategy. I have no idea what they are thinking. I mean, if they're afraid of Paul Ryan ... why did they pick him?

7:44 AM PT: Here's a possible explanation. Maybe Romney would rather talk about why he's retroactively distancing himself from Ryan than why he retroactively retired from Bain. And maybe Romney would rather talk about why he's got a secret fiscal plan than talk about his secret tax returns. Could that be it?

7:48 AM PT: Hey, and since turnabout is fairplay, Armando just pointed out that it'll be interesting to see if Ryan simultaneously seeks his old seat in the House along with being on Romney's ticket. If so, it'll be every bit as ringing an endorsement of Romney as Romney's talking points are of Ryan's plan. Such weirdness.

7:52 AM PT: Those talking points—the ones in which Romney distances himself from Ryan—shed light on why this was a Friday night news dump and a Saturday morning announcement. Yes, I know Biden got picked on a Saturday too, but that was two days before the convention. This pick, like Kerry's pick of John Edwards, is more than two weeks before the convention. Doing it on a Saturday, when the Olympics are still going on, virtually guarantees the smallest splash possible. Maybe Romneyland didn't realize that, but it sure seems like they are not seeking to maximize coverage here.


7:58 AM PT (kos):
Here's when the Republican Party paid for an ad saying Ryan's budget would "harm the Medicare program." http://t.co/...

@JoshDorner via web

8:03 AM PT (kos):

Remember when Romney proposed a constitutional amendment requiring any president to work least 3 yrs in private sector? http://t.co/...
@igorvolsky via TweetDeck

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site