Skip to main content

If vote-rigging prospers, none may call it vote-rigging. It simply becomes the new norm. Once again, the universal laws of statistics apply only outside U.S. borders. The recall vote in Wisconsin produced another significant 7% discrepancy between the unadjusted exit poll and the so-called "recorded vote." In actual social science, this level of discrepancy, with the results being so far outside the expected margin of error would not be accepted. ..... Of course, the machines could be recording wrong because they are programmed for an incorrect outcome. The easiest people to convince regarding the absurdity of electronic voting with private proprietary hardware and software are the computer programmers across the political spectrum. Statisticians and mathematicians also readily comprehend the obvious nature of rigged elections.

Please read more of this article at:

The Free Press

Also check out this interview with Bob Fitkakis:

Bob Fitkakis Interview

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  There were enough voters (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bythesea, realwischeese

    quoted as saying (along the lines of): "I'm not wild about Walker, but what's gone on hasn't justified a recall to me, as much as convince me not to re-elect him (in two years)."

  •  The result was (3+ / 0-)

    fairly consistent with what the polling largely seemed to predict (more or less), was it not?

    •  yes, every poll from March on put Walker ahead (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The exit poll fundies have a conspiracy theory about why pre-election polls are wrong (not that they would like that name). Here is an excerpt from an earlier diary posted by the same person:

      The pollsters expect there will be fraud, so they prepare for it. The RV polls are transformed to LV [likely voter] subsets in order to promote an artificial “horse race”. The pundits want to predict the recorded vote. The closer they are, the better they look. But they never mention that it’s the fraud factor that gets them close.
      In other words, the pollsters -- pretty much all of them, apparently -- rig the polls to be less Democratic, which masks the vote count fraud. Maybe that doesn't literally require a "conspiracy": they just move in lockstep because, well, because. It seems to be a conspiracy of silence, at least, if they all "expect there will be fraud" but none of them says so.

      You might ask yourself: How is it that the exit pollsters never manage to rig their polls to mask the vote count fraud? But if you ask yourself that, then obviously you aren't an exit poll fundie.

  •  Yes. n/t (0+ / 0-)

    "Southern nights have you ever felt a southern night?" Allen Toussaint ~~Remember the Gulf of Mexico~~

    by rubyr on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 04:20:43 PM PDT

  •  unfortunately, Fitrakis is repeating bunk (0+ / 0-)

    Worse, a combination of bunk and misguided fatalism:

    Democracy is dead. Long live the "adjusted" vote totals.
    Great. No mere concern troll, he. He's like the Tokyo Rose of election integrity.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site