Skip to main content

No matter what your party affiliation, if you are concerned about our federal deficit and are considering voting based on your perceptions of that issue, here are some facts. Between 1952 and 2010, Republican presidents have spent 36 years in the White House, compared to 22 years for Democrats. That works out to 62 percent of the time for Republicans (see Deficit Spreadsheet, in red) and 38 percent for Democrats (in blue). Now, for the financial impact of the story, the debt created during each administration is as follows: Democratic presidents contributed 15.5 percent of the total deficit over those 58 years; Republican presidents contributed nearly 74 percent of the deficit, according to figures from the federal Office of Management and Budget.

The raw figures reveal the dollar amount of deficit left by each president. The bottom line: Democrats added about $2 trillion to the federal deficit; Republicans added $9.6 trillion. The Republican presidents’ deficit spending is more than quadruple the amount added by Democratic presidents.

The difference between President Reagan’s $1.6 trillion in debt and President Clinton’s $1.4 trillion is significant in light of how often Republicans hurl the “tax-and-spend liberal” label at Democrats. What label perfectly describes George W. Bush’s $6.1 trillion? Radical Republicanism! According to Stephen Slivinski, director of budget studies at the Cato Institute, total government spending grew by 33 percent during Bush’s first term alone. The federal budget as a share of the economy grew from 18.5 percent of GDP on Clinton’s last day in office to 20.3 percent by the end of Bush’s first term. Under Bush, Congress passed budgets that spent a total of $91 billion more than the president requested for domestic programs. Bush signed every one of those Republican bills.

If these facts don’t gibe with what you expected, well, that’s the secret sauce of the Republican political strategy as far back as I can recall. That Republican strategy is simply this: keep repeating their big, fat lies. Lie about how Democrats are “tax and spend liberals” (Republicans are the big, wasteful spenders). Lie about how Republicans are the party of smaller government (government growth in terms of spending has mostly followed Republican success in the presidency and Congress). Lie about how their policies of tax breaks for the wealthiest 1 percent help create jobs for the rest of us (they haven’t, otherwise Obama would have inherited a much stronger economy and employment would have been trending down, instead of up, during his first year in office).

Have no doubt: Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are the poster boys of lying. Their Radical Republican agenda calls for $250,000 in annual tax breaks to each of the wealthiest households, raises taxes on the middle class, and cuts the benefits of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, health care reform, and education, programs which largely benefit the majority of middle income Americans.

If you are a 1 percent income earner, then go ahead and support Romney-Ryan. They’ve got your back and will ensure your continued success, albeit at the expense of society as a whole. If you are in any other economic classification (earning $250,000 a year or less), your vote for Romney-Ryan will be a vote against your own financial self-interest.

Indeed, as the president has been pointing out more frequently in his campaign, even the wealthiest Americans have benefited from his policies of holding down taxes on most Americans and expanding government spending while the Bush-Cheney Great Recession of 2008 slowly recedes. Obama’s building the economic recovery from the middle class and out has, at its heart, the best interests of all America.

But don’t expect any radical Republicans to sign on to that effort. Before Obama was even sworn in, Republicans met in secrecy to agree to a plan of zero cooperation with anything Democrats proposed. It was, and is, a pact with the devil they made to turn around their political fortunes following the 2008 election. The Republican promise to make sure Obama is a one-term president has resulted in the slow economic recovery and the lack of job creation since 2010, when many Congressional districts sent anti-Obama Tea Party members to the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Since then, virtually no progress has been made despite Obama’s attempts at a grand bargain, including cost containment and jobs and infrastructure bills, that would have delivered easily 2 million jobs in the last year alone. Nevertheless, far-right Congressional inaction has met with radical Republican political success, with the added result of costing the government its pristine bond rating and leading to higher borrowing costs that all taxpayers will need to cover. That’s your radical Republican Party in action, and their gift to you: a hidden tax hike, in effect.

You sent them to Washington to do your bidding, didn’t you? Have they done what you sent them there to do, create jobs? No, they lied to you, and now they expect you'll have a short memory about their abject failure. Instead, the radical Republicans have and are all about ensuring the continued success of the wealthiest among us and their top-down political agenda, using their vast superiority in private political fundraising to skew public opinion with more trickle-down policies, with the promise that you will benefit, too (a lie).

But don’t worry. There’s a simple fix. You can fire them come November, by electing folks who truly have been trying to put our best interests ahead of their own political survival: Democrats.

Reposted from LiberalOutposts.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This line of thinking works for me... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nancat357, ExStr8

    I'm not surprised to find out that the Republicans have been responsible for most of our debt.

    We saw that with Bush 43, and they've been trying to blame all that on Obama since inauguration day.

    A vote FOR any Republican is a vote AGAINST your best interests, and that of the nation.

    EVEN if you are rich!

    For a better America, vote the GOP out of office whenever and wherever possible and as soon (and as often) as possible!

    by dagnome on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 02:59:09 PM PDT

  •  Great diary well stated and makes a (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ExStr8

    good argument. I will borrow some points when I go at it in FB.

    "I want my fair share, and that's all of it" - Charles Koch

    by nancat357 on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 03:00:53 PM PDT

  •  They love money so they can talk about it; Dems (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ExStr8

    Can't. They lie; then blame us. Dems need to not talk about money (taxes, deficit, debt).

    It also helps that they're evil & hate people especially non-rich people.

    Profit is more important than people & we don't get any unless rich people make money off of us. We get moldy crumbs & to STFU.

    Hate them, hate their voters.

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 03:02:10 PM PDT

  •  We have added about $5.9 trillion more to the (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ExStr8

    national debt in the last 4 years.  The Bush tax cuts were extended and more unfunded  deficit producing tax cuts were added.

    At some point, if you don't change policy, you own it.

  •  umm the spreadsheet is wrong (0+ / 0-)

    Obama added 1.6 trillion
    Clinton added 1.4 trillion

    but total democrat is only 2 trillion and the shares don't add to 100%

    Math Fail

    •  Revision of spreadsheet; my point still relevant (0+ / 0-)

      Yes, there was a glitch in one of the spreadsheet formulas. It should read Democrats who spent 38% of the time as president presided over 26% of the deficit increases, while Republicans who spent 62% in the presidency contributed to 74% of the deficit. My point stands.

  •  Because the Republicans talk up a good show. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ExStr8

    And Democrats usually don't talk about deficits at all.

    Unless they're Blue Dogs. ...

    "If this Studebaker had anymore Atomic Space-Age Style, you'd have to be an astronaut with a geiger counter!"

    by Stude Dude on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 03:36:28 PM PDT

  •  Problem with analysis is that Presidents don't (0+ / 0-)

    dictate budgets and tax law.  The House and Senate need to go along as well, in addition Congress even overrides the President's vetoes from time to time - for example Congress imposing an investor tax cut during the Carter years when Democrats had House and Senate majorities.

    Why does your analysis stop in. 2010? Why didn't you include 2011?

    The most important way to protect the environment is not to have more than one child.

    by nextstep on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 04:37:11 PM PDT

    •  Presidents matter (0+ / 0-)

      Our own government made these figures available, and the report stopped in 2010. The president shapes his or her party policies. They rightly get the credit or the blame.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site