Skip to main content

The bottom line is that, in this 2012 election, Democrats should stop engaging the far right as equals. Groups such as the Tea Party are not actually mainstream. Their ideology continues to move so far to the right that it is becoming difficult for many Republicans to defend it. We should stop trying to meet them on common ground. You cannot negotiate with someone who holds extreme views and will not compromise. You cannot reason with someone who is unreasonable.

We should stop treating radical ideologues like equal and rational opponents. We debase ourselves and our ideas when we invest our energies in point-by-point name-calling, finger-pointing and obsessive refutation. Worse, by meeting our opponents as responsible peers, we elevate and amplify every lie and damaging policy they mention while signaling their legitimacy. Because they do not expect themselves to be factual, or even consistent, they have mastered the art of twisting language, re-assigning meaning, and persuading the already-faithful with loud voices and repeated assertions.

Imagine a street preacher, shouting to the wind. Imagine the insane raving to their walls. Where is the benefit of engaging them as equals? What is the value of giving what is holy to the dogs or of casting pearls before swine? The radical-right base will only double-down their defensive loyalty when pushed. Their base will not be moved just now. These followers will have to see their authorities repeatedly humiliated, ignored, and impotent. No amount of appeal to reason will suffice. It is time to simply lead forward.

Much of the American public is failing to distinguish between the noise and confusion of the opposing campaigns. To them, it’s beginning to sound like two primitive tribes arrayed on opposite sides, screaming incoherently, and throwing rocks and feces at each other. It is a marvelous spectacle and entertaining for a short time, but not inspiring. Neither group succeeds in differentiating itself.

The Democratic Campaign needs to quickly define and seize the virtuous, emotional, and intellectual high ground, rise out of the dust, and reclaim concepts such as its “shining city on the hill” aspirations. We must not allow the “better angels of our nature” to be drowned out. Without clearly defining and differentiating ourselves, a vast swath of our neighbors will turn away in despair, muttering “a curse on both their houses.”

You see this generalized alienation and indifference all the time and it is growing… and it is a golden, low-hanging fruit of opportunity. You see it in the hunched shoulders of some farmers as they go off faithfully, year after year, to tend their fields, but cannot be persuaded to attend their wives’ churches. You see it in the empty eyes of some people, content to sit, hour after hour, to be entertained, but cannot be persuaded to become engaged in their communities. You see it in the endless hours that entrepreneurs will sacrifice to building something that might sustain those who depend on them now, but are too burdened down to look up, lock arms, and lead others to a better future.

The American People are not immune to fear, and ours are increasingly fearful and trying times. There are several possible responses to fear and no one is unavoidable or unchangeable. Some may withdraw into personal isolation or the protection of a group of others like themselves. Some may strike out at others who are not like themselves. Yet, others are able to face and transcend their fear. This growth to maturity and strength is an individual achievement, even when it is helped along in a nurturing and supportive environment.

In fact, this individual achievement, united in good works for a common purpose, is the core of the Progressive Vision. We aspire to put aside our fear with all of its baggage of hate, prejudice, bigotry, greed, and other self-seeking. We aspire to empathy, self-control, and goodness to others.  We have faith that living such lives will help lift our neighbors out of fearful despair. We believe that, working together, neighbors, communities, and nations can solve problems that very few private enterprises could even attempt. We believe in individual and collective attention to the common good. Progressives (atheists and religionists alike) aspire to the law of love.

Where do you most see fear? You see fear in those who feel, individually and collectively, the most powerless to acquire or create what they want or need. It is natural, under those circumstances to avoid risk, to conserve and defend what you already have, and to seek out strong and authoritative movements and leaders. For some, religion serves the purpose of giving hope – if not now, then in the afterlife. Others see stockpiling wealth, arms, or private political influence as a source of security. Why should I name names? By their works, you will know them.

Perhaps it is an offensive metaphor but, the most loyal dogs have been rescued from the most abject and fearful circumstances. I believe that this principal explains the willingness of so many people in so many times and places who, lacking their own power, seek authoritarian leaders – sometimes leading their nations to tribal fragmentation, fascist regimes, or embracing the promises of “benign dictators.” We must present a better way.

Happily, the cure for such fears precisely tracks the progressive agenda: A supporting hand up for those who need it; public education; improved general economic security; increasing engagement with diverse peoples and ideas; increasing individual participation in civic and social improvement projects.

The Democratic Campaign should still defend itself against the attacks that will still be thrown their way. But, have faith; there are legions of progressive supporters who will gleefully throw themselves into the fray. They will take it as their duty and privilege to defend, protect, and respond in the cause of reason, truth, insight, and vision. They only need their generals to clearly point the way.
The Campaign should, as a supplemental effort, still release current talking points, produce point-by-point refutations, and authorize prominent surrogates to model the desired response. So armed, supporters will not just get your back, they will swarm in every direction in your service.

Above all, the Campaign should make clear the intellectual framework that underlies progressive ideas. And yes, it is useful to contrast and compare progressive values to limited and self-centered values. But, the point here is to repeatedly stimulate a sympathetic emotional response to the morality and values that promote goodness toward our neighbors. The opposition’s selfishness, lack of empathy, and short-sighted vision will obvious lack personal and public value in comparison.

We should point out the cyclic pattern of commercial abuse and progressive response in the history of this country. Sometimes we forget about the public demands for such things as trust busting and voting rights. The Republican slide to the right needs to be publicly exposed as a deliberate multi-decade effort to undermine our government’s capacity to empower its citizens, protect them from private exploitation, and increase general prosperity.

More specifically, the systematic moves of the most-radical conservatives to increase their influence (from school boards to the presidency) is more than the usual political maneuvering. Conservatives were stung by their failure to maintain racial segregation and humiliated by the progress of social liberties including the further empowerment of women. Republicans have been engaged in a systematic counter-insurgency that was triggered by the Conservative Coalition’s losing their battle against Negro civil rights. To me, that makes today’s politics a battle against pure evil.

We began noticing “ultraconservatives” and the “radical right” nationally in 1961. A variety of influences have contributed to the effort. These include the religious Moral Majority, the Koch brothers and other wealthy businessmen, conservative think tanks, and many large corporations acting through lobbyists and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). More recently, the Supreme Court allowed unlimited anonymous contributions to Political Action Committees. The common threads include money and the increase of private wealth’s influence in government.
Many of today’s Republicans were more comfortable back in the days when both the Democratic and Republican parties had their liberal and conservative wings… and legislators were expected to represent their constituencies and vote their conscience. Not every conservative, and not every Republican, is psychically invested with the right-wing’s radical fringe.

Now add the fact that President Obama has moved so far to the middle that he has disillusioned some of his own “loony left,” and you have a situation where he could appeal to a great number of independents and centrist Republicans… if only “he weren’t black,” or if only “the economy were better,” or if only it wasn’t “common knowledge that he’s a Muslim and a Communist.”

There is hope. But, only the clear light of clear communication and inspired leadership can hope to prevail. We believed that we saw it in 2008 and we’re alert for its differentiated brilliance to reassert itself, out of the noise and clutter, now.

Poll

What promises to be the most productive arguement?

0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
50%1 votes
0%0 votes
50%1 votes

| 2 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site