A bicycle is one of the most efficient forms of personal mobility ever created. Add an electric motor and suddenly a lot more people can benefit from two-wheels. And they are relatively affordable, so why is Congress just interested in electric motorcycles?
The headlines on the Internet recently read something like this: "E-bikes Get $2,500 Tax Break."
Actually, they don't.
Last week the United States Senate Finance Committee approved an amendment authored by Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) to the Family and Business Tax Cut Certainty Act of 2012. The Plug-in Electric Motorcycles and Highway Vehicles amendment states:
"The provision reforms and extends for two years, through 2013, the individual income tax credit for highway-capable plug-in motorcycles and 3-wheeled vehicles. This proposal replaces a 10 percent tax credit that expired at the end of 2011 for plug-in electric motorcycles, three-wheeled vehicles and low-speed vehicles. Thus it repeals the ability for golf carts and other low-speed vehicles to qualify for the credit."Basically, the amendment applies only to electric motorcycles that are capable of highway speeds, presumably 55 mph and higher. If Corbin or Myers Motors were actively building Sparrow/NMG EV three-wheelers, they too would qualify for the credit which remains capped at a maximum of $2,500.
Not qualifying are electric-assist bicycles or e-bikes, electric mopeds, and electric motor scooters if they aren't capable of safely operating at highway speeds. In practical terms, this means that if you buy a $11,000 Zero or Brammo e-cycle, you can take a $1,100 tax deduction, and no more. Currie Technologies IZIP e-bikes don't quality, neither does the Jetson moped (the company continues to call it a bicycle for legal reasons, though peddling it any distance would be exhausting).
Interested in one of the emerging Vespa-like e-scooters? Don't count on taking a tax deduction on them either; they're too slow, so they don't qualify under the amendment. Also restricted now are Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) regarded as 'low speed vehicles' by Congress and the IRS. So, Polaris' purchase of GEM, just took a marketing hit, as does Club Cars, Tomberlin, and other authentic US NEV manufacturers.
Not coincidentally, I believe, two of Senator Wyden's constituents happen to be located in Oregon: Brammo, located in Ashland and Motoczysz in Portland. Zero is located just down the coast in Santa Cruz, California; and BRD, a motocross start-up, is in San Fransciso, as it Lightning. Vectrix, makers of a highway-capable electric scooter, is located in Rhode Island. Apart from this handful of essentially start-up companies, there aren't many other e-cycle makers in America. There are even fewer e-bike manufacturers and virtually no e-moped builders.
Which raises an interesting question that I posed to Tom Caiazza with Senator Wyden's Washington D.C. staff. If the purpose of the amendment is to create and/or save American jobs, why focus on just this handful of companies? Why don't we also, like they've done in Barcelona, Spain and elsewhere across Europe, incentivize a spectrum of two-wheeled mobility options: regular bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, and electric motorcycles. And to forestall the flood of foreign imports that would surely follow, why not insist in the legislation that to qualify for the tax credit they must be assembled in the US from a high percentage of US-made parts. Such a provision would not only help equalize the cost difference between Asian-made two-wheelers and US-made ones, but would help re-stimulate a largely moribund industry, one ripe for innovation if given the right incentives.
Not that any of this will actually matter. According to Caiazza, while the amendment was approved by the Finance Committee, the chance of the bill actually being voted on in the Senate or its eventual counterpart in the House, is unknown. Like a pair of rutting elks joisting with horns locked in ideological combat, the US Congress may wait until after the November elections before they even consider the bill, if then. Mr. Caiazza wouldn't speculate when the bill might be taken up. So, don't hold your breath that the credit will be enacted. But in the interim, maybe the Senator and his colleagues can be persuaded to rethink the measure so that instead of just preserving a few hundred jobs in Oregon and California, it helps ignite a two-wheeled revolution across America. After all, it just takes a couple of sentences in the bill that read something like this:
"The American Two-Wheeled Revolution Amendment reforms and extends for five years, through 2017, the individual income tax credit on all two and three wheeled vehicles that are assembled in the United States from more than 50 percent U.S. manufactured parts. The maximum allowable tax credit is $2,500 and the minimum on a US-made bicycle is $250 or 10% of the value of the vehicle, whichever is less."