Skip to main content

Rep. Todd Akin
Public Policy Polling. 8/20. Likely voters. MoE: ±4.4% (5/24-27 results):
Claire McCaskill (D-inc): 43 (44)
Todd Akin (R): 44 (45)
Undecided: 13 (11)
If you're reading this post, you already know all about Republican Rep. Todd Akin's amazing meltdown on the subject of rape, which led to members of his own party furiously trying to shove him out of the race all day Monday. Well, in our ultra-fast-paced media environment, Akin's remarks definitely penetrated quickly—see below—but PPP's single-night poll found that they haven't managed to budge the contest's toplines at all. So what's going on here? PPP's Tom Jensen explains:
It's not that Missouri voters are ok with or supportive of Akin's comments. 75% of voters, including even 64% of Republicans, say they were inappropriate to only 9% who consider them to have been appropriate. 79% of voters say they disagree with what Akin said, including 65% who express 'strong' disagreement with him. 51% of GOP voters say they strongly disagree with him.

All of that is taking a toll on Akin's image. Only 24% of voters have a favorable opinion of him to 58% with a negative one. He's pretty universally disliked by Democrats (3/85) and independents (21/61) and even with Republicans (43/34) he's on only narrowly positive ground.

But for all of that the overall numbers in the race have moved very little. When we polled in May McCaskill was getting only 8% of the Republican vote, and even with the controversy around Akin she's only pushed up to 10% of it. GOP voters dislike McCaskill so much they're not going to vote for her no matter what their nominee does. Independent voters haven't moved at all either. In May they supported Akin 45-41, and even though they don't like him on tonight's poll we still found him leading 45-41 with them.

I'm honestly not that surprised. In the same way movement conservatives readily allowed their white-hot hatred for Obama to help them get over their qualms about Romney, right-leaning voters in Missouri don't seem to care about Akin's debacle nearly as much as they care about loathing Claire McCaskill. As Tom says, this is what the "hyper polarization" of American politics is all about.

There are important caveats to bear in mind with this poll, though: It was only in the field a single night, a practice most pollsters (including PPP) typically try to avoid, but which was necessary here given how fast-moving this situation is. (Nate Silver once discussed this issue a bit here.) And also, while most interviewees indicated familiarity with Akin's comments, some respondents may feel pressure to say they have heard about his remarks even if they haven't, to avoid appearing uninformed about current events. (Of course, PPP uses an automated system to conduct its polls, so there isn't any live interviewer you need to confess your ignorance to, meaning this hopefully wasn't a major problem.)

And if you aren't buying the notion that independents have remained unchanged in their views, well, that's also a reason you might want to be skeptical of these numbers. But unless events overtake us, I'm sure we'll soon see other polls, which will either bear these numbers out or set them apart. In the meantime, though, if Todd Akin was looking to bolster his case for staying in the race, PPP just gave it to him.

9:30 PM PT: As some commenters have pointed out, the poll's sample was pretty red: 39% of respondents identified as Republicans, while only 30% are Dems and 32% independents. PPP's May poll was 35 D, 33 R, 33 I. According to the 2010 exit polls (obviously a high-water mark for Republicans), it was 37 R, 34 D, 28 I.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 08:46 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site