Skip to main content

In my observation, Republican politics in the Obama era has, in the aggregate, come to be grounded in two things: self-congratulation and resentment. The theme of "We Built This" (or, "We Did Build This," or however they ultimately decide to formulate it) encapsulates this very well.

We all know the background behind the phrase/sentiment, so there's no need to re-hash it here. Given that context, "We Built This" is the perfect slogan for a Republican party, and a "conservative" political cohort, that deeply admires itself and deeply resents the suggestion or implication that such admiration might be misplaced or unwarranted. I've lost count of how many times I've heard and read "conservatives" (a term I'll use here for brevity's sake to include the GOP, its candidates, officeholders, media enablers, voters, supporters, fans, &c., including libertarians and Tea Partiers) talk about how hardworking, self-sufficient, independent, law-abiding, upstanding, charitable, &c., they are, and almost always in direct comparison to how lazy, shiftless, dependent, weak, needy, amoral, &c. non-conservatives supposedly are.

It's not unusual or unprecedented for political candidates, and members of a political cohort, to talk about things they admire about themselves, and to compare that to what they don't admire about their opponents. But I think the emergence of the Tea Party has elevated this aspect of Republican politics to new heights. Indeed, I've never seen a political cohort that admires itself as much as the Tea Party does (which is one reason why I don't take their self-description seriously). The GOP took the baton and made self-congratulation and resentment its central ethic for 2010, and now its central National Convention theme for 2012.  

Conservatives admire conservatives; they admire themselves for being conservatives and for not being "liberals" (meaning, essentially, not wanting or believing any of the things their 1970s caricatures of "liberals" want and believe). Everywhere I look, I find conservatives listing things they admire about themselves, right alongside and in direct comparison to things they disdain about "liberals." Conservatives believe in freedom and liberty and self-reliance and personal responsibility and limited government and private charity and family values, while liberals believe in big government and dependency and high taxes and punishing success and blah blah blah. Here are a few comments I read yesterday over at HuffPo, from just one commenter on one thread:

Liberals hate [public services, public works, &c.] because they are trying to destroy them through financial collapse. Conservatives love these things because they are trying to save them by rescuing our finances.
...
Republicans believe in personal responsibility and initiative-the things that made us great. Liberals believe in destroying real America and replacing it with a sure-to-fail socialist state.
...
Conservatives emphasize positive things, liberals advocate weakness and dependency.
...
Conservatives are the party of responsibility and reality, and liberals are the party of me-no responsibilities and the nanny state.
...
If you are a responsible, mature, independent, hard working, patriotic American-vote Republican. If you are a helpless victim, you think the world owes you something, all your problems are someone else's fault, successful people are evil, and the nanny-state life is the life for you-vote Democrat.
...
Conservatives don't single out specific groups for hand-holding and nose-wiping-that's the liberal pc way of doing things.
...
If we divided the country into two sections, and put all the liberals in one and the conservatives in the other, the liberal side would be a living version of "Lord of the Flies." The conservatives would have a healthy, functioning country based on maturity.
Even ignoring the standard caricaturing of "liberals," and allowing for the fact that this person is probably a paid troll, look at the self-admiration in these comments. We hear this from Republican officeholders and candidates on the stump all the time; "We believe in freedom and opportunity; they believe in dependency and government control." They admire themselves, and expect everyone to admire them, just for being the former and not the latter.

(Notice also how some conservatives obscure the inherent selfishness and cruelty in certain Republican policy positions by couching them in something admirable; in terms of something conservatives admire about themselves. Denying civil rights to gay people is masked behind "support" for "traditional marriage" and "family values."  Forcing women to bear rapists' children is masked behind "support" for "human life." Enabling unchecked corporate greed, exploitation and destruction is masked behind "support" for "freedom" and "success.")

And, as we've seen, this self-admiration carries with it a deep resentment that stems from an intense desire to feel heroic, and to be perceived as heroic by others. Conservatives see themselves as heroes; pioneers, entrepreneurs, good, fine, decent, moral, upstanding citizens who've earned everything they have without any help from anyone. They can't help but resent the "help" they perceive has been "given" to non-conservatives or non-Republican constituencies (at conservatives' expense, naturally), which conservatives have never needed and never received. A person can't truly feel heroic on the basis of his own perceived accomplishments alone; proud, maybe, but not heroic. He has to feel that he's been victimized, that he's had to overcome some obstacles, some sinister forces that stood in his way.  And he has to be perceived as heroic by others.

So this year's RNC is a chance for our Republican Heroes (a term I've actually heard/read conservatives use in conversations with me) to congratulate themselves for building whatever it is they think they've built, and to resent the suggestion that they didn't build it on their own. I wouldn't have thought it possible, but they've actually chosen the perfect theme.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It would be a keen irony if we see those (0+ / 0-)

    posters and banners saying "We did build this" lying in the rubble in the aftermath of Isaac.  We did build it, and it did fall down because despite a wealth of rightwing virtues, crappola still happens.

    Romney went to France instead of serving in our military, got rich chop-shopping US businesses and eliminating US jobs, off-shored his money in the Cayman Islands, and now tells us to "Believe in America."

    by judyms9 on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 09:21:09 AM PDT

  •  nice GOP messaging (0+ / 0-)

    Honestly, this diary repeats so much of the GOP framing that I can't tell which side the author is on.

    Thanks especially for bolding the Republican messages.

    •  Really? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ConfusedSkyes

      I might suggest you read it again, but I'm more interested in why ascertaining "which side the author is on" is so important. Why should the diary indicate that the author is on any "side"?

      My point is that Republican politics (i.e., "GOP framing") is grounded in self-congratulation and resentment. The bolded messages illustrate what that looks like. If there's a way to illustrate "GOP framing" without explaining what it is and providing examples, I'd like to know what that might be.

      I should think anyone, on any "side," would be able to recognize self-congratulation and resentment when they see it.

    •  These are diaries, not soundbites. (0+ / 0-)

      When the purpose is to highlight and ridicule the framing, in particular, repetition of the opposition's cartoonishly self-absorbed statements is not harmful. While the diary perhaps could be framed to more clearly highlight the author's critiques, your particular response goes beyond the edge of criticism and into the void of belittlement - and against someone whose side you ostensibly share. To what productive end?

  •  The one thing they did "build" all on their own (0+ / 0-)

    is the MESS the Republican Party has become.  

    Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love. - Einstein

    by moose67 on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 09:23:42 AM PDT

  •  Cartoon/Ad Opportunity!! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bobatkinson

    "We built it"
    with pics of Jamie Dimon, Blankenfeld, Greenspan, Paulson, Cheney, & Bush.

    We built your great recession and useless, costly war.
    We built your 1% economy.
    We built our bonuses, for ourselves.

    One could go on & on.  I hope the Dems go right after them on this.

  •  I think you need to diversify your sources (0+ / 0-)

    Quoting extensively from one troll on Huffpo is meaningless.

    •  This is an observation, not a research paper. (0+ / 0-)

      The quotes are for illustration of type, not proof of concept.

      •  Without acknowledging the nature of trolls, (0+ / 0-)

        it seems you are giving the most credit to those who are least serious in the opinions they claim to hold. These people spend their time making up shit on that site in order to earn cheetos money from their Republican overlords. They believe none of what they write.

        •  That's probably fair, but (0+ / 0-)

          the framing of "conservatives believe in [X], liberals believe in [Y]," where [X] is a litany of admirable things and [Y] is a litany of delusions about nonexistent caricatures, is ubiquitous in Republican politics even beyond the troll-iverse. Listen to Republican candidates/officeholders from Romney on down. "We believe in freedom and success, they believe in dependency and government control." They admire themselves, and expect others to admire them, just for being the former and not the latter.

          I've begun to realize that this is why conservatives aren't funny. I've always known that they lack a sense of humor about themselves, hence their "jokes" are only directed outward and lack the self-reflection necessary for true comedy. It's because they admire themselves too much to believe that even their worst excesses could be legitimately ridiculed.

          The larger point is that self-congratulation and resentment have become staples of Republican politics. I was hoping that wouldn't get lost in the illustration.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site