Skip to main content

Crossposted from"News from the Front".

This afternoon, Missouri Senate candidate and rape definer John Akin tweeted this.

I apologized but the liberal media is trying to make me drop out. Please stand w/ me tonight by signing my petition at
That led to this response from your humble narrator.
Dear .@ToddAkin, just for the record, I want you to stay in the race…Because we need someone for McCaskill to beat in November.
But then again, I’m not an “Elite” liberal.  I’m more of a scrappy, salt of the earth, Root Beer and Microwave Popcorn kind of liberal.

But let’s take a moment to look at this apology.

Okay, He says he misspoke. That he used the wrong words.
He acknowledged that rape is an evil act.
He said he has a compassionate heart for all victims of sexual assault.
He said that the mistakes were in the words he said, not the heart he holds.
Here’s my problem with that.
This past Sunday, Think Progress reminded every one that he and Paul Ryan were the original cosponsors of H.R. 3.

Federal law prevents federal Medicaid funds and similar programs from paying for abortions. Yet the law also contains an exception for women who are raped. The bill Akin and Ryan cosponsored would have narrowed this exception, providing that only pregnancies arising from “forcible rape” may be terminated. Because the primary target of Akin and Ryan’s effort are Medicaid recipients — patients who are unlikely to be able to afford an abortion absent Medicaid funding — the likely impact of this bill would have been forcing many rape survivors to carry their rapist’s baby to term. Michelle Goldberg explains who Akin and Ryan would likely target:

Under H.R. 3, only victims of “forcible rape” would qualify for federally funded abortions. Victims of statutory rape—say, a 13-year-old girl impregnated by a 30-year-old man—would be on their own. So would victims of incest if they’re over 18. And while “forcible rape” isn’t defined in the criminal code, the addition of the adjective seems certain to exclude acts of rape that don’t involve overt violence—say, cases where a woman is drugged or has a limited mental capacity. “It’s basically putting more restrictions on what was defined historically as rape,” says Keenan. (Bold type mine.)

Although a version of this bill passed the GOP-controlled House, the “forcible rape” language was eventually removed due to widespread public outcry. Paul Ryan, however, believes that the “forcible rape” language does not actually go far enough to force women to carry their rapist’s baby. Ryan believes that abortion should be illegal in all cases except for “cases in which a doctor deems an abortion necessary to save the mother’s life.” So rape survivors are out of luck.

(Fun fact for my neighbors in the OR-O2 district.  Rep. Greg Walden was also a cosponsor of the bill.)

Let me make this clear.  And I’ll try to use small words for the cheap seats.
I am not saying that every pregnancy that is conceived in rape should automatically be terminated.  I acknowledge that there are women in this world who are brave enough to carry that child to term and care for it. And they are to be applauded for it.  There are any number of stressors that come from having an unplanned child. Physical, mental, financial.
And a child born from a trauma like this carries additional burdens.
If the woman is single, how does she acknowledge the conception to her family and friends?
If the woman has a partner, how does he or she handle the circumstances of the conception?
When the child is of age, how do you answer the question when he or she asks “Where did I come from”?
Can you even look at the child if he or she has their father’s eyes?
In a world singularly filled with tough calls, this is the toughest. And the only one qualified to make it is the woman with the child growing inside of her.
But according to Mr. Akin and Mr. Ryan, if a woman is raped and that act doesn’t fit the narrow definition that they deem suitable, that woman will have no choice but to carry that child to term.  She will be forced to undergo an experience that she does not want, again!
And that, more than any word choice is what is unacceptable here.
So no Mr. Akin. I do not accept your apology.  And I do not care what words you use or what heart you hold but what policies to seek to inflict upon my friends and neighbors.
Because where there is choice, there is freedom.
And I will not let you take that freedom away.
But hey, by all means, stay in the race.
As I said before, Claire McCaskill needs someone to beat in November.
It might as well be you.

EDIT: 7:23. Added blockquotes to the tweets.


Should Todd Akin stay in the race?

0%0 votes
25%4 votes
12%2 votes
50%8 votes
12%2 votes
0%0 votes

| 16 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    grrr, reflectionsv37, Gooserock, Kalidurga

    "The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity" Harlan Ellison

    by TheRagingCelt on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:11:53 PM PDT

  •  romney's radical views are like Akin's (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TheRagingCelt, Gooserock

    $ to DFA, none to DSCC/DCCC/DNC

    by grrr on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:16:29 PM PDT

    •  Oh, yeah. I saw that. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      "The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity" Harlan Ellison

      by TheRagingCelt on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:18:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Dr Wilke's comments about Akin, Romney and Ryan (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        from daily telegraph


        Dr Willke told The Daily Telegraph that he did meet Mr Romney during a presidential primary campaign stop in the doctor's home city of Cincinnati, Ohio, in October last year. ...

        “He [Romney] told me "thank you for your support – we agree on almost everything,..." Dr Willke said in a telephone interview on Tuesday.

        Dr Willke wrote an open letter on Tuesday declaring that “the pro-life movement and I unequivocally stand with Rep. Akin” ...

        The doctor said that he had also met Mr Ryan, ...several times. He said that after listening to Dr Willke’s views on abortion during their last encounter, Mr Ryan replied: “That’s where I’m at”.

        $ to DFA, none to DSCC/DCCC/DNC

        by grrr on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 09:44:20 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Remember Wilke's Informed By Scientific Tests (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      in Nazi death camps.

      We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

      by Gooserock on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:52:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  What happened to that cry of Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TheRagingCelt, Musial

    that republicans were screaming about in 2010? I guess as soon as they got themselves all comfortable in the House, they went right back to their old ways. On the 3rd bill of the 112th Congress, they were right back on abortion. Come to think of it, I think it was actually the 2nd bill. If I remember correctly, John Boehner pocketed HR 1 for his own personal use. They used HR 2 to try and repeal the Affordable Care act.

    And they wonder why this Congress has the lowest approval rating in history?

    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

    by reflectionsv37 on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:36:07 PM PDT

  •  Salem witches (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TheRagingCelt, drmah, Musial

    Anybody else notice that these idiots are using the Salem witch trial methodology?

    If you get pregnant, then you must not have been raped.  (If you sink and die, then you must not have been a witch.)

    But if you DON'T get pregnant, well then you were "legitimately" raped.

    These cats are weird.

  •  He says his words were off but his heart was (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TheRagingCelt, Musial

    in the right place. The problem is that what that means is he is a No Exception guy, that's where his heart is. Assuming he has one.

    The real problem he has is explaining how anyone with a heart and supposedly any respect for the Constitution can sentence a certain number of women to death0 remember the risk of death 'exception is not even under discussion - , without trial or any sort of due process, by denying her medical care for a condition which without the rights meds or the abortion will kill her before she comes to term, and a jail term if she acts, and lives. And there's no saying that the fetus will survive.  At least the rapist gets a trial and survives. But a certain number of women will not, and will be entirely and completely without remedies, as will the families who lose them.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site