Skip to main content

So this is the headline in USA Today that greeted me this morning, along with tens of thousands in airports and hotels across the country:

"Romney: Obama is waging a 'vicious' campaign"
With this sub-headline below the fold:
"Republican calls president's tactics low- but effective. He talks about lessons learned and the road ahead."
Here's the opening line of Ms. Page's article from the interview, given in a Columbus, OH suburb after Mr. Romney's last rally before the Tampa convention:
"Mitt Romney calls campaign attacks by President Obama and his allies "vituperative" and "vicious" and "absurd" and "sad". Also: Effective. "I do think that the president's campaign of personal vilification and demonization probably draws some people away from me," Romney says when asked why he's no better than tied against a vulnerable incumbent."
Then the article goes into the usual fluff we've all come to expect from our vaunted "liberal" media about personal biography and Mr, Romney's enviable advantages of enthusiasm and money, leading in a USA Today/Gallup poll on the economy and apparently "more likely to be respected by foreign leaders".

More below the fold

The headline on page 4A where the article continues?

"Romney: Voters 'deserve better'"
And where it continues on page 5?
"Isn't it sad that the focus of the president's campaign, having been president for four years, is to try and attack the personality of the person he's running against as opposed to standing up for his record and his plan for the future? Mitt Romney
Okay, we all expect puff articles during the Republican convention week like those short bios that ran over the weekend on cable, and maybe if they can avoid having mean things said about them by the right there might even be a comparable piece on President Obama next week.

My problem? The headlines in the piece are blatant lies, and unless the candidate insisted on editing the article personally, totally unnecessary even in the environment of giving a candidate an unfettered platform to say anything he wants unchallenged.

We've come to expect that year round our intrepid journalists will allow whoppers to come from the right with no follow up at all, like maybe "that has been dis-proven by multiple fact check organizations, why do you continue saying it?"

And in particular we political junkies begrudge no candidate the opportunity to have his own words put forth, even the lies, especially this week. Just not splashed across the nations new stands in bold type unchallenged.

My beef has to do with my own background where airports and hotels were my life year round, where sometimes I had time to pick up several papers on a long layover or an extended hotel stay and read them all thoroughly, but more often than not with mere minutes to spare the only chance to keep abreast of news were furtive skimming of the paper's headlines, sometimes while still in the racks.

Those in similar situations today traveling the nation were treated to blatant lies created and placed by USA Today, not Mitt Romney.

Everyone paying attention knows the President has taken the high road and criticized only policy and it's potential consequences while Mitt Romney has personally race baited and lied in his own ads by claiming falsely our first black President is trying to abolish work from the welfare program and turn the country into a European socialist state and he doesn't know what it's like to be an American, among other dog whistles.

This from a paper who's editorial page has long since sold out to the cat food commission's insistence that because Wall Street Bankster's stole the nation's wealth and sent it to secret accounts in The Cayman's, Bermuda, and Switzerland, among other destinations, the rest of us have to give in to Republican's seventy-year efforts to dismantle the New Deal and their almost fifty-year efforts to destroy the Great Society safety net programs and learn to "live within our means".      

We wonder how in the heck can half the country believe that tax cuts increase revenue, blah people are all drawing welfare and food stamps, Republicans are fiscal conservatives concerned about the deficit, or that they're the "pro-life party, or that Obama's coming for our guns, or that Obamacare "cut" 716 billion from Medicare when he strengthened it and extended it's life by eight years by re-investing wasteful over-payments created by Congress in their corporate giveaway Medicare Advantage program, or that they're the "family values" party, and on and on and on?

There you go.

P.S. Hey, media, I listened to some of Hannity and Rush traveling in the rental car today - they still hate you and said you're all on Obama's payroll anyway. Try, try, try.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (9+ / 0-)

    "extravagant advantage for the few, ultimately depresses the many." FDR

    by Jim R on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 05:45:08 PM PDT

  •  I've Chosen To Go Healthy This Week..... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Supavash, phonegery, Jim R, missquested

    Until the Republican Convention is over, I'm not going to watch MSNBC or CNN.  Never watch FOX anyway.

    I just can't stomach the lies.  Both Michael Steele & Newt Gingrich lied their butts off today on Chris Matthews.  Also think I've heard enough about how America now believes Mitt Romney would handle Medicare better than the Democrats.

    Stupid people deserve exactly what they get....& in this case, they're going to get a measly voucher for their stupidity.  

    •  I wish I could (0+ / 0-)

      Thirty year habits are hard to break, even when they involve watching in horror as "Reagan Democrats" sold out their class, a Republican congress conducted 1,052 "investigations" of the Clinton administration, or lately when they try scaring the beejebus out of low information working folks too busy or incapable of knowing better.

      "extravagant advantage for the few, ultimately depresses the many." FDR

      by Jim R on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 07:10:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Where's The Video Of The President's "Vicious" (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    phonegery, Jim R, PorridgeGun


    Their extreme language whining isn't gonna convince any independents or moderates.  

    •  That's exactly my fear (0+ / 0-)

      that some might be persuaded. Those too busy to know better or those predisposed to believing the guy that looks like them instead of that other guy.

      "extravagant advantage for the few, ultimately depresses the many." FDR

      by Jim R on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 07:05:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The choice of adjectives (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Jim R

    seems a little too esoteric. The four syllable ones may be a
    little over the comfortable reading level of the voters.  

    The small "absurd", and "sad" seem overwhelmed by the company they are forced to keep  

    "vituperative",  "vicious",  "absurd" and "sad",  "personal vilification",  "demonization".

    Is the repetitive 'v' intentional  or accidental? If intentional, should they not be grouped, to highlight the triple 'v'?

    The dictionary lists vilification as a noun.  Somehow I can't get the words to match.  Darn.  Perhaps someone will make it work.  I'm thinking of the Winston Churchill cadence that made his speeches so effective.

    Democrats - We represent America!

    by phonegery on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 07:24:44 PM PDT

    •  I thought the word choices strange too (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      and wondered if they resulted from pre-interview written talking points or collaborative post-interview editing.

      "extravagant advantage for the few, ultimately depresses the many." FDR

      by Jim R on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 07:45:32 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Hello! USA Today panders to conservative (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Jim R

    business men and women. Their advertisers know this and depend on it being center right to frankly right.

    I'd tip you but they cut off my tip box. "There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.” - Frank Zappa

    by OHdog on Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 08:42:00 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site