Skip to main content

The New York Times yesterday ran a feature titled "A History of New York in 50 Objects" and one items included was an old metallic Silence = Death button from ACT UP. My friend and ACT UP member Bill Dobbs provided the Times with the button, pictured, on which you can see scratches. Here's an excerpt from the Gray Lady's caption:

In 1982, 752 cases of a mysterious and fatal illness that would be called Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome were reported in New York City. By 2010, nearly 170,000 cases had been diagnosed. Over 30 years, the illness devastated whole communities even as it served as a focal point for the gay rights movement, especially Act Up, which campaigned vigorously against the government’s slow response to the epidemic . . .
As a co-founder of ACT UP, I must point out that while there were many gays and lesbians in the group and we had a pro-gay agenda, our ranks were filled with lots of straight people infected with HIV or affected by the epidemic. It is not okay to render the heterosexual folks of ACT UP invisible.

I also object to the Times so narrowly defining ACT UP's agenda in the caption. Yes indeed, we were rightfully pissed off at our government's woefully inadequate handling of the medical and political crises. However, we also had to contend with the media, especially the Times due to its far-reaching influence, either ignoring the AIDS epidemic or underplaying the severity of it.

Attention to people with AIDS and the crisis in the Times was so bad, a protest was held at the home of the publisher, which I was at. Excerpts from Doug Ireland's August 8, 1989, Press Clips column in the Village Voice:

[L]ast Tuesday, 150 members of ACT UP demonstrated on front of New York Times publisher Punch Sulzberger's residence at 1010 Fifth Avenue and then marched to West 43rd Street.

This demo was preceded by a Sunday zap in which outlines of dead bodies were stenciled on the streets around Sulzberger's pad, and the neighborhood decorated with stickers emblazoned, "All the News That Kills." By the time ACT UP's troops arrived for Tuesday's picketing, they found the sidewalk in front of chez Sulzberger torn up and barricaded, and a waiting army of police who forced the demonstrators onto a side street . . .

"AIDS Crisis Escalates While N.Y. Times Sleeps" was the headline on the leaflet ACT UP distributed, which asked: "Why, instead of actively investigating the work of federal health organizations, does the Times merely rewrite [their] press releases? ... Such compliance makes the Times a mere public relations agent for an ineffective government.... Why did the Times, in its June 29 editorial (Why Make AIDS Worse Than It Is?) dismiss a new federal study finding a 33% under-reportage of AIDS infections in the US? This callous editorial assured its general readership that AIDS will be over soon, once infected members of undesirable risk groups die off." . . .

During the many terrible years when the paper didn't give a damn about people with HIV/AIDS and those who loved and cared for them, the criticism against the Times was not confined to just the alternative Village Voice. In the 1990 book "AIDS Demo Graphics" by Douglas Crimp and Adam Rolston, these facts were prominently mentioned:
A book will one day be written about the New York Times's continuous failure to report the AIDS crisis accurately -- if at all. It will no doubt begin with the infamous comparison noticed by Larry Kramer:

• During the first 19 months of the AIDS epidemic (by the end of which time there had been 891 reported cases), the Times carried seven articles about it, none of them on the front page.

• During the three months of the Tylenol scare in 1982 (seven cases), the Times carried fifty-four articles about it, four of them on the front page.

While it's certainly good to see the Silence = Death button included on the list of historical New York City objects, let's not quietly accept the New York Times absolving itself of how it was the necessary target of ACT UP's ire.  
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Saw that too. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Quite ironic, if one has any clue of the actual history and the deadly silence the NYT was quite comfortable maintaining.

    Fuck me, it's a leprechaun.

    by MBNYC on Mon Sep 03, 2012 at 01:20:03 PM PDT

  •  Big enemies marching in columns and (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    riding on tanks are so much more exciting and real that viruses and bacteria we can't even see without a microscope.
    "Seeing is believing."  So, what can't be seen is not to be believed.  Never mind that "appearances are deceiving."
    For many humans the sense of sight is the only one that counts.  Perhaps that's because it is the only one we can turn on and off by merely shutting our eyes. The human brain does like being in charge of what goes in and out.

    We organize governments to provide benefits and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Mon Sep 03, 2012 at 03:20:06 PM PDT

  •  I used to read it daily (0+ / 0-)

    I got the New York Times at work for 30 years, and subscribed to Saturday and Sunday on my own dime.

    Then I early retired, and saw that I was getting along without the daily. So I let my subscription to the weekend issues lapse. Yeah, I missed all the pro-war articles before we went into Iraq, and that's OK.

    So now I can't boycott or otherwise fight back when the Times does the dirty work for the smug and powerful in America. It carries on without me, and vice versa.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site