Skip to main content


Their Math just doesn't Add up. They know it. The President knows it.

Pretty soon, everybody will know it.


'Bad math': Obama slams Romney, Ryan for lack of specifics

firstread.nbcnews.com  2012/09/09

[...]
"Governor Romney and his allies tell us that we can somehow lower our deficit by spending trillions on new tax breaks for the wealthy. Listen, you've got to do the math because when my opponents were asked about it today, they couldn't. It was like two plus one equals five," Obama told a crowd of more than 3,000 in a gymnasium at the Florida Institute of Technology here.

When asked during an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press" what tax loopholes he would eliminate, Romney got no more specific than telling host David Gregory, "high income taxpayers are going to have fewer deductions and exemptions."

On ABC News' "This Week," Ryan said Romney and he would consult with Congress before deciding which loopholes to cut. "We want to do this with the consent of the elected representatives of the people and figure out what loopholes should stay or go," he said.

Of their lack of specifics, Obama said, "That's not bold leadership, that's bad math."


Their Math just doesn't Add up.  No Goldstars for them!





Math is not like Political gamesmanship -- one is debatable; the other is not.

Math problems are either solved -- or they're not.  Arithmetic is funny that way ...

Of course "explaining stuff" -- has never been Romney-Ryan's strong suit ...


Does a Romney-Ryan Ticket Really Ensure Clash of Visions?

by Francis Wilkinson, bloomberg.com -- Aug 12, 2012

Romney’s campaign is emerging from two weeks of brutal scrutiny of his budget plan. After analyzing the plan on Romney’s own terms, the Tax Policy Center concluded it was "mathematically impossible."
[...]

His selection of Ryan doesn’t clarify that intentional muddle. A Romney plan that deliberately doesn’t add up is now complemented by a Ryan plan that deliberately doesn’t add up. As Ezra Klein explains here, Ryan’s plan assumes that the federal government will eventually shrink to the point that it consists of defense, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. And Medicare would be drastically revised. [...]


Would a President Romney and a Republican Congress prove willing to inflict high levels of pain on the poor and middle class while further reducing historically low taxes on the wealthy? What of the Republican donors -- the contractors and corporate welfare recipients -- who feed so well at the federal trough? [...]


For the Romney-Ryan Budget Plan to reach its "mathematically goals" -- their austerity pain will have to be spread far and wide -- except for the wealthy few, of course.

However, their Plan if allowed to happen -- again, does do a Bait-and-Switch few have yet to notice. It would exchange one uphill growth line (social fabric) for another ... to fight a problem we don't really have (the Russians, Iran):


The Numbers Don’t Add Up on Mitt

Romney’s Defense Budget

by Lawrence Korb -- July 2012  -- Center for American Progress Action Fund

[...]
Gov. Romney’s defense plans would be prohibitively expensive. He has pledged to set the Pentagon base budget (not counting war funding) “at a floor of 4 percent of GDP,” which would result in at least $2.1 trillion in added spending over the next decade compared to the Department of Defense’s current plan. Gov. Romney has not elaborated on what specific threats prompt him to call for this huge increase in defense spending.

Meanwhile, Gov. Romney says he would cut marginal tax rates for individuals by 20 percent and balance the budget. He has embraced Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget plan and said he would cap federal spending at 20 percent of GDP but exempt Social Security. To keep these various promises, he would have to cut nondefense programs other than Social Security, such as Medicare and Medicaid, by 59 percent over the next decade.[2] Thirty-two years and eight presidential elections later, voodoo economics has returned to the Pentagon’s fiscal course.


larger image

And while Gov. Romney would spend trillions countering threats from a bygone era, he hasn’t outlined a serious agenda to address the two greatest long-term problems facing the Pentagon: poor management of Pentagon procurement and rapidly growing Department of Defense personnel costs that put the All-Volunteer Force at risk.

In 2009 Secretary of Defense Robert Gates began a program to change how the Department of Defense contracts goods and services with the aim of saving $100 billion over the five-year program. [...]


Surprising growth-line projections there, huh?  Of course not that surprising, when you consider the Neoconservative Advisers, that Mitt Romney has surrounded himself with.  Cost has never been "anything objective" to them ... now has it?  That's someone else's problem -- Paying the Bills.



Their Math just doesn't Add up.  Never has. Never will.

Just Charge it!  has always been their motto.  

Why would they change their ways now?  Because if there's one thing Republicans know how to do -- it's how to leave the country in deep debt.  With NO intention of ever paying-for those Republicans bills themselves -- out of their own Revenue-pockets.



EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site