Skip to main content

If you caught any of the Republican Convention, you noticed strong themes around the need for personal responsibility.  In their view, the government does more harm than good when it shields its citizens from the consequences of their own actions.  They view the assumption of personal responsibility both as a virtuous and moral goal as well as a natural right.  They see the "Nanny State" as anything that prevents people from feeling the impact of their decisions and as the root of many social and fiscal ills.  

Textbook descriptions of the difference between the Republican and Democrat parties will often cite that the Republicans are the party of personal responsibility while the Democrats are the party of social responsibility.  This often comes up in the debate over Welfare as the Republicans identify Welfare as a corrupting force that damages the individual that receives it while it saps society of funds that would be better spent elsewhere.  They see Welfare as people getting something for nothing.

So does it strike anyone as odd that the party of individual responsibility is so opposed to the Affordable Care Act?

It really struck me while watching the Republican convention that the connection of the ACA to personal responsibility is not being made.  At least it's not being hammered home by the Democrats when they defend the ACA.  Although many Republicans will always oppose the ACA simply because it was championed by Obama, surely there are independent (and moderate Republican) voters out there that are big fans of personal responsibility and would respond favorably to descriptions of the ACA as the "Accountable Care Act"?  The biggest piece of personal responsibility legislation to pass since Bill Clinton's Welfare reform?  

And on the topic of Welfare reform, the ACA is also a strong reform piece in its own right.  To the Right, what's wrong with welfare is that it corrupts its recipients by giving them something for nothing.  Aside from its financial cost, many Republicans are opposed to the concept of Welfare simply because (in their view) it rewards people for doing nothing.  But the ACA puts an end to that in the healthcare realm by requiring everyone to have insurance.  That ends the "free lunch" that the old way of distributing healthcare used to propagate.  

Before the ACA, if you didn't have insurance, you could get care without contributing anything.  No one was forced to take responsibility of their health care, but instead were reliant on society to cover them. The fact is that if you don't have insurance, you can get health care from an emergency room when you need it.   Basically, anyone without health insurance was on the biggest welfare program in the country, with everyone else subsidizing their lack of personal responsibility.  But now, thanks to the Democrats and President Obama, everyone will be required to chip in what they can to help support their health care.

What's really surprising to me, is how absent this discussion is from the public discourse.  No one ever describes the ACA in the terms of Welfare Reform.  No one describes the Individual Mandate as a bulwark for personal responsibility.  Truthfully, I never thought about the Individual Mandate in the terms of personal responsibility until I listened to the Republican convention.  Maybe it's time we turn their arguments back upon them?  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site