Skip to main content

Now that the Values Voters Summit has ended, it’s time to take note that damning demographics are facing the Religious Right as well as the Republican Party as a whole.

When the coalition of Catholics and what today is referred to as Evangelicals participated in the first presidential election influenced by the Religious Right in 1980, Catholics were 24.7 percent of the U.S. population and Baptists were 32.7 percent (Baptist being the closest denomination in 1980 for what we commonly think of as Southern and rural conservative, white Christians).

A 2010 survey compiled by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies shows Catholics are down to 19.1 percent, Evangelical and conservative Protestants at 14.3 percent, while numerous polls tell us the number of Americans unaffiliated with any denomination keeps growing.

The stats are even more dismal for the solidly-Republican Catholic bishops. Forty percent of U.S. Catholics are Latino and the majority of Latino Catholics support the Democratic Party. For non-Hispanic Catholics, roughly 40 percent still currently identify with or lean towards the Democrats compared to only a little over 20 percent of Evangelicals favoring the Democratic Party.

While I’m not suggesting that the plutocrats are going to entirely stop providing money to and public showcases for their clergy partners, the demographic trends – even if one wanted to quibble about the exact numbers - should be keeping some awake at nights wondering what was it worth for a professed Christian leader to turn his back on Christ.

Originally posted to Betty Clermont on Mon Sep 17, 2012 at 08:41 AM PDT.

Also republished by House of LIGHTS.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site