Skip to main content

This is a very short, and very paranoid diary.  

I have noticed over the last few months that in the comments sections of many online versions of publications, after any article critical of Mitt Romney, there is always a large number of comments disagreeing and repeating fairly similar talking points.

Also, when President Obama announced his suspension of deportations of undocumented immigrant young people who are in this country through no fault of their own, the local public radio station, WNYC had a call in asking what immigrants thought about the program.

The reaction was overwhelmingly negative, which was weird.  Then a Latina woman from Westchester County called in, excoriating the president's policy as just politics, but couldn't explain what immigration policy she would like to see.  Then even more weirdly, she slipped up and said, there are lots of Hispanic Mormons like her in her community.  I don't want to disparage any racial, ethnic or religious group, but it sounded like she had her marching orders from Salt Lake City.

So today's big story is the leaked tapes, which were publicized through Mother Jones magazine.  If you look at the comments on their website, the comments are OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of Mitt Romney and condemning President Obama.

And I'm like, wait, wot? wot the fug?  The vast majority of people commenting on Mother Jones are supporting Mitt Romney and excoriating President Obama?

I check out New York Magazine and Jonathan Chait's article on the video clips and it's the same talking points.  Same with articles critical of Romney in the Guardian of London and many other left progressive outlets.

Well, let me just say:

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site