Skip to main content

Just like Wednesday, a metric ton of polling was dropped onto the head of your intrepid Wrap curator, as yesterday's record of 39 separate polls was shattered by today's tiny offering of 54 unique polls.

But, hey, there's no crying in polling analysis, so let's get on with it. The problem today, in all candor, is trying to find a coherent theme for the day. I suppose if one exists, it is that a number of rapidly developing memes took a shot in the gut today. It was almost like today was some kind of an homage to ESPN football analyst Lee Corso, the former coach who is fond of refuting his colleagues with a pointed statement that begins with the words "not so fast, my friend!"

Think the GOP is safe in the battle for control of the Speaker's gavel? Not so fast, my friend!

Think Elizabeth Warren is a lock in Massachusetts, and that Arizona will stay red at the Senate level? Not so fast, my friend!

Think that Mitt Romney's 47 percent comment would devastate his prospects in national polling? Not so fast, my friend!

And, friends, don't even try to make sense of the presidential state polling. It is an invitation to utter confusion.

With that in mind, on to the numbers:


NATIONAL (Gallup Tracking): Obama 47, Romney 47

NATIONAL (Ipsos/Reuters): Obama 48, Romney 43 (LV); Obama 48, Romney 38 (RV)

NATIONAL (Rasmussen Tracking w/leaners): Obama 50, Romney 47

NATIONAL (Univ. of Connecticut): Obama 46, Romney 43

CALIFORNIA (PPIC): Obama 53, Romney 39

COLORADO (NBC News/Marist): Obama 50, Romney 45 (LV); Obama 50, Romney 44 (RV)

COLORADO (YouGov): Obama 49, Romney 45

CONNECTICUT (Univ. of Connecticut): Obama 53, Romney 32

FLORIDA (Caddell and McLaughlin--R): Romney 48, Obama 44

FLORIDA (We Ask America--R): Obama 49, Romney 46

FLORIDA (YouGov): Obama 48, Romney 46

IOWA (NBC News/Marist): Obama 50, Romney 42 (LV); Obama 51, Romney 40 (RV)

IOWA (Rasmussen): Romney 47, Obama 44

IOWA (YouGov): Obama 48, Romney 42

MASSACHUSETTS (Univ. of Mass-Lowell): Obama 59, Romney 36 (LV); Obama 60, Romney 35 (RV)

MICHIGAN (Glengariff Group for the Detroit News): Obama 52, Romney 38

MICHIGAN (YouGov): Obama 51, Romney 42

NEVADA (CNN/ORC): Obama 49, Romney 46 (LV); Obama 50, Romney 44 (RV)

NEVADA (Rasmussen): Obama 47, Romney 45

NEVADA (YouGov): Obama 51, Romney 43

NEW HAMPSHIRE (YouGov): Obama 47, Romney 40

NORTH CAROLINA (High Point University): Obama 46, Romney 43

NORTH CAROLINA (YouGov): Obama 46, Romney 46

OHIO (Caddell and McLaughlin--R): Obama 47, Romney 44

OHIO (YouGov): Obama 47, Romney 44

PENNSYLVANIA (Susquehanna Research--R): Obama 48, Romney 47

PENNSYLVANIA (We Ask America--R): Obama 48, Romney 42

PENNSYLVANIA (YouGov): Obama 52, Romney 43

VIRGINIA (YouGov): Obama 48, Romney 44

WISCONSIN (NBC News/Marist): Obama 50, Romney 45 (LV); Obama 51, Romney 43 (RV)

WISCONSIN (PPP): Obama 52, Romney 45

WISCONSIN (Rasmussen): Obama 49, Romney 46

WISCONSIN (YouGov): Obama 48, Romney 46

AZ-SEN (Unidentified Republican Pollster): Richard Carmona (D) 44, Jeff Flake (R) 39

FL-SEN (We Ask America--R): Sen. Bill Nelson (D) 47, Connie Mack IV (R) 42

FL-SEN (YouGov): Sen. Bill Nelson (D) 44, Connie Mack IV (R) 40

MA-SEN (Univ. of Mass-Lowell): Sen. Scott Brown (R) 49, Elizabeth Warren (D) 45 (LV); Sen. Scott Brown (R) 50, Elizabeth Warren (D) 44 (RV)

MI-SEN (Glengariff Group for the Detroit News): Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) 50, Pete Hoekstra (R) 34

MI-SEN (YouGov): Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) 46, Pete Hoekstra (R) 40

NV-SEN (Rasmussen): Sen. Dean Heller (R) 42, Shelley Berkley (D) 41

NV-SEN (YouGov): Sen. Dean Heller (R) 42, Shelley Berkley (D) 35

NJ-SEN (Fairleigh Dickinson): Sen. Robert Menendez (D) 50, Joe Kyrillos (R) 36 (LV); Sen. Robert Menendez (D) 49, Joe Kyrillos (R) 33 (RV)

OH-SEN (YouGov): Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) 46, Josh Mandel (R) 42

PA-SEN (YouGov): Bob Casey (D) 46, Tom Smith (R) 38

VA-SEN (YouGov): Tim Kaine (D) 43, George Allen (R) 42

WI-SEN (NBC News/Marist): Tammy Baldwin (D) 48, Tommy Thompson (R) 46 (LV); Tammy Baldwin (D) 49, Tommy Thompson (R) 44

WI-SEN (YouGov): Tommy Thompson (R) 48, Tammy Baldwin (D) 42

NC-GOV (YouGov): Pat McCrory (R) 48, Walter Dalton (D) 32

CA-10 (DCCC IVR): Jose Hernandez (D) 46, Rep. Jeff Denham (R) 44

IL-08 (Tarrance Group for the Walsh campaign): Tammy Duckworth (D) 47, Rep. Joe Walsh (R) 45

ME-01 (Maine Peoples Resource Center): Rep. Chellie Pingree (D) 60, Jon Courtney (R) 32

ME-02 (Maine Peoples Resource Center): Rep. Mike Michaud (D) 56, Kevin Raye (R) 37

MI-01 (PPP for the League of Conservation Voters): Gary McDowell (D) 44, Rep. Dan Benishek (R) 42

RI-01 (Feldman Group for the Cicilline campaign): Rep. David Cicilline (D) 46, Brendan Doherty (R) 36, David Vogel (I) 7

A few thoughts, as always, await you just past the jump...

So...what are we to make from this heaping helping of fresh data?

The hardest thing to try to divine out of this are the numbers at the top of the ticket. It looks like, at least provisionally, we are seeing the re-emergence of one of our favorite electoral themes from the Spring: substantial divergence between state and national numbers. Obama's national poll numbers, when paired with Mitt Romney, are fairly "meh" today. A new University of Connecticut poll had Obama up by just three points (and actually trailing in what the college kids dubbed the "battleground states"), and Gallup returned to all square for the first time in nearly a month, confounding all expectations, especially after the Romney "47 percent" shitstorm on Monday.

But the state polls, on balance, looked pretty damned good for Team Obama. Republicans will no doubt continue to take NBC and Marist's name in vain, for the polling partnership, as it did last week, produced three outstanding polls for Barack Obama in swing states. Worse still: the leads got even bigger (and Iowa into double digits) when the screen was merely one of registered voters.

The RV/LV gap was an issue elsewhere, as well. What would be a reasonably impressive six-point lead for Obama in Nevada got crunched down to three points, according to the likely voter screen employed by CNN/ORC. And, nationally, a modest five-point edge among likely voters in the Ipsos-Reuters online tracking poll jumped up to a full ten-point lead among registered voters.

The most confounding set of polls, arguably, were the new numbers from online pollsters YouGov. Now, regular readers of the Wrap know the automatic skepticism that accompanies online samples in these parts (indeed, the only poll that will never see light of day in the Wrap, because of poor past performance, is the online polling from Zogby). However, YouGov did a pretty solid job of finding the fairway in 2010, and thus have earned some latitude. their numbers were just plain bizarre. The presidential numbers seemed pretty fair--indeed, if anything, they seemed to favor Obama. But their Senate numbers were generally lousy for the Democrats. For example, they were the only pollster in the past week or so to give Tommy Thompson any kind of a lead, and YouGov actually had him plus-6! Likewise, even as the House of Ras showed tightening in the Nevada Senate race, YouGov gave GOP incumbent Dean Heller a relatively solid cushion of seven points.

YouGov was not the only pollster to make you go "hmm" on Thursday. U-Mass Lowell jumped into the fray, becoming the only pollster this week to defy the trend and claim that GOP Sen. Scott Brown was still out in front in his re-election bid against Elizabeth Warren. Are they the only voice of reason in the Bay State? Well, and this is purely anecdotal, I'm a skeptic. Tonight's Warren-Brown debate dropped some inadvertent hints, one would think. For what it is worth, Scott Brown's demeanor was not one of a guy whose internal polling is telling him that he is cruising. Across the country, a new GOP poll (more on this later) was equally confounding, as it became the first poll to show Democrat Richard Carmona as the slight leader to pick up a seat for the Democrats in Arizona. The poll had him up five points over Republican congressman Jeff Flake. Even Carmona's own polling, up to this point, has had him tied or down a point or two.

Meanwhile, a case continues to build that Democrats have a nonzero chance of reclaiming the House, and that it is quite possible that chance is escalating by the day. Two more GOP incumbents are trailing in internal polling, and the funniest thing is that  one of them (freshman Rep. Joe Walsh) is trailing in his own internal polling. A dusty (mid-August) poll for his campaign had him down two. Presumably, that saw the light of day because Walsh wanted to convince the NRCC (and donors) that he is not in full rigor mortis just yet, and was still worthy of some aid and comfort.

In other polling news...

  • Easily, my favorite polling story of the week is that Arizona poll. Not for the topline result, although every Democrat without a doubt welcomes seeing a race that has routinely been viewed as "Likely R" become a legitimate threat to flip to the Democrats. Nope, it is the cloak-and-dagger secrecy that accompanies this poll. As the local affiliate there notes in their write-up of the survey, it was conducted by a Republican pollster. But the identity of said pollster is still unknown, because it was apparently leaked without authorization. Translation: GOP firm polled the race, got shitty numbers, and was not going to release them publicly. Until someone with access to said numbers, for whatever motive, decided to alert the media. If nothing else, this will almost certainly spur some public pollster to give 'Zona a shot, even if it looks right now like Barack Obama is not going to play in this state, conceding its 11 electoral votes to the GOP.
  • Today's "gotta be kidding me" poll today has to belong to local pollsters Susquehanna Polling and Research, who were apparently contracted by the Pennsylvania GOP to produce some numbers. And, boy, did they produce. The problem is that, in this data-heavy part of the cycle, it did not take ten minutes for their numbers to be immediately contradicted. Their Obama +1 finding was not only contradicted by YouGov (who found Obama up by 9 points), but also a fellow GOP firm (We Ask America, who had Obama +6). The write-up of the poll does bring good news for Democrats: the head of the PA-GOP says that the Romney campaign is not conceding the state, and will be advertising there soon. Democrats, who remember the late-in-the-game Hail Mary attempt by the McCain campaign in the Keystone State in 2008, will surely welcome that call.
  • In Susquehanna's defense, however, their Senate numbers, while a joke, are a bit less so. If there is a Democratic seat viewed as safe that might warrant a second look, it is this one. Bob Casey still leads, and still leads rather comfortably, but his numbers have noticeably sagged in the past couple of weeks. Not only did Susquehanna find the lulzy three-point margin, but YouGov had the race at 8 points. What's more: a Muhlenberg College poll earlier in the week still had Casey up double-digits, but had him down to 45 percent. Indeed, he has been at 45-46 percent in the last three polls out of Pennsylvania. Now, given how comparably far behind Smith is, I don't see this as a cause for panic yet. But there is a clear movement, and it does merit watching.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 06:30 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site